I should say, "needless to say," that I am ecstatic over the book for validating all the truths we already knew about TWITLER - and about actually all of his crew and congresscritters for being unscrupulous sycophants for the sake of greed and power in supporting in the first place and now continuing to support this unspeakably repugnant TWITLER.
That said, I saw the GUTHRIE-WOLFF interview and saw him be a little bit evasive. We all know TWITLER is a constant liar, and we received TWITLER's tweet about never having been interviewed by WOLFF as a lie just on the face of its being TWITLER saying it. But GUTHRIE had to ask WOLFF *twice* whether he had interviewed or not TWITLER. When pinned down, he said he had had frequent contact with TWITLER "during the campaign" and (once?) after the inauguration, sort of veiling that "for three hours" meant a TOTAL of three hours adding up scattered contacts. Also, he said that maybe TWITLER didn't realize the interactions were an "interview" but that it was certainly "on the record."
My immediate question when the book news broke was how could a writer/reporter be sitting on sofas in the West Wing for a year without raising suspicions among TWITLER's protectors (if there *are* any protectors). GUTHRIE asked him whether he curried favor to get the access and he said he did whatever he had to do, which is FINE with me.
Repeating, it is all FINE with me, just that my impression of WOLFF was that he was evasive and cagey. Truman CAPOTE lost all his friends when he published what they had confided to him. But us consumers love us them sneaky artists!1
= new reply since forum marked as read
