Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

applegrove

(118,915 posts)
Fri Jan 5, 2018, 06:20 PM Jan 2018

Trumps Anti-Hillary Crusade Could Break the Justice Department

BARBARA MCQUADE at the Daily Beast

https://www.thedailybeast.com/trumps-anti-hillary-crusade-could-break-the-justice-department?ref=wrap

"SNIP........

And now, it appears that DOJ is reopening the investigation. Renewing an investigation into the president’s political opponent just because he demands it is wrong and dangerous. The Department of Justice is not the president’s personal legal team, designed to lock up his rivals. DOJ has a long tradition of independence from the White House. Bowing to the wishes of the president to investigate his political enemies would undermine public confidence in the objectivity of DOJ’s charging decisions in this case and all others.

One legitimate reason to reopen an investigation would be the discovery of new evidence. Just as the FBI reopened the investigation in October upon finding new email messages on a laptop computer, reopening it again could be appropriate if some other new evidence has been discovered or new witness has been identified. But today’s report does not indicate that any new evidence has been discovered.

In the absence of newly discovered evidence, it would undermine the non-partisan nature of the Justice Department to reopen an investigation just because of a change in the party that is in charge of the executive branch. Reopening this case could set a dangerous precedent for future administrations to reconsider all charging decisions with which they disagree.

It may be, as some have speculated, that the new investigation is designed merely to appease Trump, and that officials know full well that no charges will emerge. Even that sort of charade would be an abuse of the awesome powers of the Department of Justice and a waste of resources that could be better spent on new cases. One would hope that DOJ’s leaders would have the backbone to reject such pressures rather than to pretend to accede to them.

.....SNIP"

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

RKP5637

(67,112 posts)
1. Trump, doing what many dictators do, go after your opponents with the justice system or soldiers
Fri Jan 5, 2018, 06:25 PM
Jan 2018

in the night. Maybe Putin is giving him some ideas.

marybourg

(12,650 posts)
2. Yes, this is a serious threat to our democracy.
Fri Jan 5, 2018, 06:27 PM
Jan 2018

I think this is worthy of week-end street demonstrations, but the issue is probably not visceral enough to actually get people out on the streets.

marybourg

(12,650 posts)
5. True. I had forgotton. I' m where it's in the 70's.
Fri Jan 5, 2018, 06:53 PM
Jan 2018

We could come out. I think I'll call our phone tree manager (really text & email tree now).

Irish_Dem

(47,980 posts)
8. Cold weather is perfect time for everyone to stay home and read the Wolff book.
Fri Jan 5, 2018, 07:29 PM
Jan 2018

I think a better use of time right now than demonstrations.

pangaia

(24,324 posts)
9. NJo freakin' way am I going to buy that book.
Fri Jan 5, 2018, 08:38 PM
Jan 2018

Talk about generating negative emotion.

I will listen to some Sibelius instead.

delisen

(6,048 posts)
4. If they come for H Clinton, they will come for us
Fri Jan 5, 2018, 06:46 PM
Jan 2018

As much as possible they will pick us all off -one by one, group after group.

I woud like to see those Democrats who are jockeying for position for the 2020 race put their personal ambition aside and stand up forcefully for the winner of the 2016 election.

Will they do it, will we do it or do we let Putin/Trump/Republicanism win? They know our weaknesses, they exploited our divisions, and they are continuing to do so.

Actually the ball is in our court.

6. It doesn't matter what the FBI finds, unless it condemns Hilary he won't accept it.
Fri Jan 5, 2018, 07:19 PM
Jan 2018

"Sentence first--verdict afterward," said the Red Queen.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Trumps Anti-Hillary Crusa...