General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTrumps Anti-Hillary Crusade Could Break the Justice Department
BARBARA MCQUADE at the Daily Beast
https://www.thedailybeast.com/trumps-anti-hillary-crusade-could-break-the-justice-department?ref=wrap
"SNIP........
And now, it appears that DOJ is reopening the investigation. Renewing an investigation into the presidents political opponent just because he demands it is wrong and dangerous. The Department of Justice is not the presidents personal legal team, designed to lock up his rivals. DOJ has a long tradition of independence from the White House. Bowing to the wishes of the president to investigate his political enemies would undermine public confidence in the objectivity of DOJs charging decisions in this case and all others.
One legitimate reason to reopen an investigation would be the discovery of new evidence. Just as the FBI reopened the investigation in October upon finding new email messages on a laptop computer, reopening it again could be appropriate if some other new evidence has been discovered or new witness has been identified. But todays report does not indicate that any new evidence has been discovered.
In the absence of newly discovered evidence, it would undermine the non-partisan nature of the Justice Department to reopen an investigation just because of a change in the party that is in charge of the executive branch. Reopening this case could set a dangerous precedent for future administrations to reconsider all charging decisions with which they disagree.
It may be, as some have speculated, that the new investigation is designed merely to appease Trump, and that officials know full well that no charges will emerge. Even that sort of charade would be an abuse of the awesome powers of the Department of Justice and a waste of resources that could be better spent on new cases. One would hope that DOJs leaders would have the backbone to reject such pressures rather than to pretend to accede to them.
.....SNIP"
RKP5637
(67,112 posts)in the night. Maybe Putin is giving him some ideas.
marybourg
(12,650 posts)I think this is worthy of week-end street demonstrations, but the issue is probably not visceral enough to actually get people out on the streets.
pangaia
(24,324 posts)marybourg
(12,650 posts)We could come out. I think I'll call our phone tree manager (really text & email tree now).
Irish_Dem
(47,980 posts)I think a better use of time right now than demonstrations.
pangaia
(24,324 posts)Talk about generating negative emotion.
I will listen to some Sibelius instead.
Irish_Dem
(47,980 posts)go a long way.
delisen
(6,048 posts)As much as possible they will pick us all off -one by one, group after group.
I woud like to see those Democrats who are jockeying for position for the 2020 race put their personal ambition aside and stand up forcefully for the winner of the 2016 election.
Will they do it, will we do it or do we let Putin/Trump/Republicanism win? They know our weaknesses, they exploited our divisions, and they are continuing to do so.
Actually the ball is in our court.
LastLiberal in PalmSprings
(12,601 posts)"Sentence first--verdict afterward," said the Red Queen.
Wellstone ruled
(34,661 posts)is the Roberts Court all in with the Trump Crime Family.
Kirk Lover
(3,608 posts)FUCK UP.