Has a lot of explaining to do.
Why did they do this?
Unless to protect the person in the Trump campaign that was talking to them.
Jim Comey also has to explain why he was OK releasing the info about Hilary but not about Trump.

In Trump Tower. They said there was nothing to it. Nothing to see here, move along. Right.

So many things have happened and you forget

-Puzzler

They also damaged Clinton by entering into an agreement with Peter Schweizer to publish pre-publication information from his hit piece called Clinton Cash. Schweizer worked with Steve Bannon before writing this book, which was part of Bannon’s plan to damage Hilary. The information in the book has been debunked, but the NYT reported it as fact before the election. Add their slant toward Trump by not reportng any of the well-known facts about his business dealings and his fines for money laundering, and you have an anti-Clinton bias that helped Trump win.

distortions and lies. Thanks

and told them to kiss his ass. Then they realized that they had made a terrible mistake.

Or maybe they just got to keep their kneecaps.

The thing is, once you accept that the Russian oligarchs intended to tip the election toward Donald Trump, it's pretty much a done deal that maximally thuggy and corrupt things happened.

a little dated no?

and how until recently the Times refused to acknowledge that they were giving trump a get out of jail free card during 2016.

That is the second link in the post, and was on the WP online front page.

It also didn't stop at 2016. There is plenty of reporting throughout 2017 where the Times went out of their way to present false equivalencies between Democrats and republicans.

journalism has been superb recently and a tremendous force for democracy. Our founding fathers wrote freedom of the press into the first amendment--it's that critical to democracy. The NYT has been awarded over 150 Pulitzers and garnered I have no idea how many nominations, truly a world-class paper.

While it continues to earn awards, studies have proven and quantified the NYT's chronically dishonest coverage of Hillary and the Democratic Party. It seems certain that without the NYT's help Trump would never have been elected and the GOP would not control congress.

If Pulitzers required high standards of journalism of an entire paper, instead of just an article or series, the NYT would be completely disqualified.

These recent examples of flagrantly dishonest journalism, all pulling the same direction, seem to be de facto proof that the NYT is being infiltrated by the same huge corrupting forces that took over the GOP: Namely conservative seditionists among the new ultrawealthy classes that we should never have allowed to arise. They are using their money and power, and owership, to corrupt all our institutions to their purpose.

Including the AP, btw, which itself blankets this entire nation with a blizzard of its releases every day, and on a few select days in 2016 blanketed the nation with lies and misinformation about Democratic candidates.