Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

dlwickham

(3,316 posts)
Sun Jan 14, 2018, 04:49 PM Jan 2018

Exclusive: Mark Wahlberg refused to approve Christopher Plummer unless he was paid

https://www.usatoday.com/story/life/people/2018/01/11/exclusive-mark-wahlberg-refused-approve-christopher-plummer-unless-he-paid/1026347001/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter

Mark Wahlberg refused to approve Christopher Plummer as a replacement for Kevin Spacey in All the Money in the World unless he was paid over a million dollars for the reshoot, USA TODAY has learned.

Wahlberg had co-star approval in his contract, two people familiar with the situation but not authorized to speak publicly about it tell USA TODAY.

"What he said was, 'I will not approve Christopher Plummer unless you pay me.' And that's how he (expletive) them," says one person.



I know what movie I won't be going to see
29 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Exclusive: Mark Wahlberg refused to approve Christopher Plummer unless he was paid (Original Post) dlwickham Jan 2018 OP
Whaaa? People... negotiate? Say it aint so! unblock Jan 2018 #1
He is a fucking asshole JI7 Jan 2018 #2
He wasn't the one who caused Williams not to be paid -- that was the fault of her agent, pnwmom Jan 2018 #16
+1 Blue_Tires Jan 2018 #24
Agree! Nt Anon-C Jan 2018 #29
#TimesUp for All the Money in the World. TeamPooka Jan 2018 #3
Did Wahlberg have lots of scenes already shot with Spacey? dawg Jan 2018 #4
Yes, and he had a lot more scenes to be reshot than Williams did. I blame the agent pnwmom Jan 2018 #17
All of which (and some more) was donated to the Times Up Legal Defense Fund Lurks Often Jan 2018 #5
What's worse, Christopher Plummer as co-star or Trump as President? Where's our compensation? Doodley Jan 2018 #6
This Mark Wahlberg? marble falls Jan 2018 #7
He's "changed" and "grown" only because he's rich and famous dalton99a Jan 2018 #19
He donated the 1.5 million to the Times Up movement.a Tipperary Jan 2018 #8
Why should anyone care about this? tritsofme Jan 2018 #9
Wahlberg stars in every other movie released these days, his parkerMcDavis Jan 2018 #10
I will give you points for not saying DEMOCRAT activist Skittles Jan 2018 #21
His agent is better than the other actors' agents. SharonClark Jan 2018 #11
Same agency. nt tblue37 Jan 2018 #22
Wahlberg's a busy actor and producer. Reshoots may even have cost him time/money on other projects. Gidney N Cloyd Jan 2018 #12
1) Machinist reads blueprints and makes parts ret5hd Jan 2018 #13
But it's a dude so it's baaaaaad Blue_Adept Jan 2018 #14
I don't blame Wahlberg - I blame the agent who represented both of them pnwmom Jan 2018 #15
Same agency, but probably different agents. nt tblue37 Jan 2018 #23
Good point. Ken Burch Jan 2018 #26
I thought it was understandable because sarah FAILIN Jan 2018 #18
The movie is awesome DemocratSinceBirth Jan 2018 #20
A few months ago, "Marky Mark" was attacking Hollywood people for making political statements. Ken Burch Jan 2018 #25
I have seen several different reports on this saying different things dsc Jan 2018 #27
This story is all mixed around.... cbdo2007 Jan 2018 #28

pnwmom

(109,024 posts)
16. He wasn't the one who caused Williams not to be paid -- that was the fault of her agent,
Sun Jan 14, 2018, 06:23 PM
Jan 2018

who represented both of them, and allowed a clause in her contract that said she had to do re-shoots for free.

And Wahlberg has just donated his salary on the re-shoot to charity, in Williams's name. So I don't know why people are criticizing him.

dawg

(10,626 posts)
4. Did Wahlberg have lots of scenes already shot with Spacey?
Sun Jan 14, 2018, 05:06 PM
Jan 2018

If so, I can understand him wanting to get paid for doing tons of reshoots.

pnwmom

(109,024 posts)
17. Yes, and he had a lot more scenes to be reshot than Williams did. I blame the agent
Sun Jan 14, 2018, 06:24 PM
Jan 2018

who negotiated both their contracts.

dalton99a

(81,707 posts)
19. He's "changed" and "grown" only because he's rich and famous
Sun Jan 14, 2018, 06:42 PM
Jan 2018

and he can afford to repaint himself and purchase his pardon

 

parkerMcDavis

(58 posts)
10. Wahlberg stars in every other movie released these days, his
Sun Jan 14, 2018, 05:33 PM
Jan 2018

time is valuable. He negotiated a business deal, so what? He did nothing wrong or dishonest, but went ahead and donated the money anyway. Seems to me he’s a stand up guy.
If he was a democratic activist the people here trashing him would be stepping all over each other to defend his actions. Of this I have no doubt because I see it done here every day.

Gidney N Cloyd

(19,847 posts)
12. Wahlberg's a busy actor and producer. Reshoots may even have cost him time/money on other projects.
Sun Jan 14, 2018, 05:43 PM
Jan 2018

I can't blame him for negotiating compensation for the extra work. I'd imagine the others would have done the same thing if they'd had a similar bargaining chip in their contracts. I bet they work a new clause into their contracts next time.

ret5hd

(20,563 posts)
13. 1) Machinist reads blueprints and makes parts
Sun Jan 14, 2018, 06:16 PM
Jan 2018

2) Employer changes blueprints and demands new parts

3a) Does machinist make new parts for free
or
3b) Does machinist get paid for making new parts

pnwmom

(109,024 posts)
15. I don't blame Wahlberg - I blame the agent who represented both of them
Sun Jan 14, 2018, 06:19 PM
Jan 2018

and negotiated a contract for HER that required her to do re-shoots for free.

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
26. Good point.
Sun Jan 14, 2018, 06:55 PM
Jan 2018

Marky Mark should have pushed for HER to get the extra money too, out of simple fairness.

She was glad to do the reshoots essentially for free, but it's about more than her on this.


sarah FAILIN

(2,857 posts)
18. I thought it was understandable because
Sun Jan 14, 2018, 06:33 PM
Jan 2018

He had to put the other movie he was directing on hold to re-do this work. That put a lot more people than him in a bind.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,719 posts)
20. The movie is awesome
Sun Jan 14, 2018, 06:44 PM
Jan 2018

Movies I have seen recently

Darkest Hour *****
Tonya *****
All The money In the World *****
Roman Israel ****
Three Flags Over Ebbing Missouri *****
The Post ****

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
25. A few months ago, "Marky Mark" was attacking Hollywood people for making political statements.
Sun Jan 14, 2018, 06:53 PM
Jan 2018

Makes you wonder if he was trying to protect himself from blowback because he knew the pay equity issue on this would go public.

dsc

(52,173 posts)
27. I have seen several different reports on this saying different things
Sun Jan 14, 2018, 07:03 PM
Jan 2018

I would have a problem with him having done this to jack up his fee but if merely had both the right to be paid for the reshoot and the right to name costar in his contract as I have read elsewhere then that is a different story. Both he and Williams deserved to be paid for re shoots.

cbdo2007

(9,213 posts)
28. This story is all mixed around....
Sun Jan 14, 2018, 07:26 PM
Jan 2018

The story here should be that all the other actors and film people were UNDERPAID not that one guy was paid correctly.

Let's imagine something happened at Walmart where they knocked all the shelves over in the storage room or something and 5 people had to work an extra 40 hours some week to fix the storage room. They should all be paid their normal rate.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Exclusive: Mark Wahlberg ...