General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsOh that's not suspicious or anything... 👀
The Associated Press?Verified account
@AP
BREAKING: AP Sources: Steve Bannon attorney relayed questions to White House during House interview, was told when not to respond.
Thats according to people familiar with the closed-door session who spoke to The Associated Press on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly.
During the day-long interview Tuesday, Bannons attorney Bill Burck was asking the White House counsels office by phone whether his client could answer the questions. He was told by that office not to discuss his work on the transition or in the White House.
MORE:
https://apnews.com/c103dc352c604ae29b442bbec4cc9106?utm_campaign=SocialFlow&utm_source=Twitter&utm_medium=AP
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
democratisphere
(17,235 posts)The overreach of this WH is absolutely insane! Acting more authoritarian each day!
FakeNoose
(32,899 posts)Well that's going to end. Strip search each person before they enter the interrogation room.
Interrogation should take place in a wifi-free environment.
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,073 posts)Baitball Blogger
(46,777 posts)All wrapped up in a pretty package.
Arkansas Granny
(31,542 posts)NewJeffCT
(56,829 posts)Baitball Blogger
(46,777 posts)MFM008
(19,834 posts).....
peggysue2
(10,850 posts)And they did it for a Congressional audience.
Desperate measures for desperate times. Unless they really thought no one would notice.
Baitball Blogger
(46,777 posts)by Republicans.
peggysue2
(10,850 posts)working feverishly to normalize all the bizarre behavior. The Trumpster's remaining base supporters will make excuses for just about anything.
For the rest of us? Not so much. Because this behavior isn't getting better; it's getting worse.
But as you said, the Republicans have turned into the Pod People.
uponit7771
(90,371 posts)FSogol
(45,586 posts)Eliot Rosewater
(31,137 posts)If the person doing it is a republican, no, if it is a democrat, not only is it obstruction but they would be drummed out of politics day one.
We know republicans do not have to nor do they play by the rules.
Historic NY
(37,461 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Probably be pretty easy to get the device the messages were being sent to. I don't even think they would have to know who had the device or what kind it was.
spanone
(135,929 posts)And only his money.
Roland99
(53,342 posts)aikoaiko
(34,186 posts)D_Master81
(1,823 posts)Are they just going to argue executive priviledge here? I dont know what kind of argument you have to stand on where you say he cant talk about something to an investigation. November cant get here fast enough so we can get these sham committees to hopefully do their job. As it is they're doing nothing but wasting tax payer dollars to assist in a cover up by the white house.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)That's how the Bush administration was able to stop Karl Rove's testimony, see:
http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/07/10/rove.subpoena/index.html
Ultimately it'd be up to the courts to decide the extent of any "executive privilege".
For more background on the issue, see:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_privilege
gratuitous
(82,849 posts)I wonder if anyone on the House Intelligence Committee noticed that Bannon's attorney was furiously messaging someone and that the answers to questions were held up for a little while until the attorney got a response? Is this courtesy commonly extended to everyone appearing before the committee? Because it seems a smidgen odd that people not in the room for a closed session of the committee would have not just knowledge of what was going on, but input on the proceedings.
Moostache
(9,897 posts)or understand that they are no longer dealing with a county commissioner or zoning committee that can be strong armed to get something they want...
The sheer idiocy of the current POTUS is staggering, and he MUST be held to account for it all...that which is currently doing and that which was done in pursuit of the office he holds and also that which was done prior to the election.
Trump is filthy, not merely tainted or dirty. He needs to go down in epic and public fashion, NOW!
FirstLight
(13,368 posts)...he should have been cuffed right then and there for talking to the subject of an investigation...
Maybe I don't know the law that well, but DUH!
Lifelong Protester
(8,421 posts)MontanaMama
(23,367 posts)Which is also a crime, right??
Lifelong Protester
(8,421 posts)jmbar2
(4,920 posts)Our nation appears to be helpless against the criminal takeover of the white house. How can this be? If Trump murdered someone in the white house, they'd just debate it, I guess.
world wide wally
(21,760 posts)Sophia4
(3,515 posts)PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)who can then do the same thing.
Sophia4
(3,515 posts)Makes you look like you are trying to avoid answering questions, and also wastes the time of the members of the grand jury. Not a way to win friends and influence people.
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)Book em Mueller!!!
PJMcK
(22,069 posts)There is too much hand-wringing in this thread. Geez.
If the Congressional committee doesn't like Bannon's refusals to answer questions and they accept his claim of executive privilege, then it is up to Congress to enforce its rules. They could declare Bannon in contempt of Congress and have him taken into custody until he answers their questions.
Not this Congress. They are toothless. More importantly, they don't want the truth to come out since so many of them are complicit with Trump's corruption.
Regardless, the Congressional investigations are meaningless because they are being directed, by Grassley and Nunes, down rabbit holes of nothingness.
Let's see what Robert Mueller comes up with. He isn't tainted by Trump's stank and he's clearly smarter than all of these other idiots. I truly believe he will reveal the length and breadth of Trump's corruption and illegalities. In those exposures, I also believe many others, mostly Republicans, will be exposed as traitorous scum.
Let's not worry. The truth will be made public. It will be ugly and divisive. It will cause a lot of trouble that will take time to heal. But it will be the only way to purge our system of the corrupting rot of this band of miscreants.
Ligyron
(7,645 posts)Transparent?
Yeah, they're not even trying to make it look like anything other than witness tampering and obstruction of justice.
Clear as can be.