Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe high price of letting unions die.
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/01/democrats-paid-a-huge-price-for-letting-unions-die.html"With its financial contributions and grassroots organizing, the labor movement helped give Democrats full control of the federal government three times in the last four decades. And all three of those times under Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton, and Barack Obama Democrats failed to pass labor law reforms that would to bolster the union cause. In hindsight, its clear that the Democratic Party didnt merely betray organized labor with these failures, but also, itself."
and
"If the Democratic Party wasnt bleeding support from white working-class voters in its old labor strongholds, it would dominate our national politics. Understandably, Democratic partisans often blame their powerlessness on such voters and the regressive racial views that led them out of Team Blues tent. But as unions have declined across the Midwest, Democrats havent just been losing white, working-class voters to revanchist Republicans theyve also been losing them to quiet evenings at home. The NBER study cited by McElwee found that right-to-work laws reduce voter turnout in presidential elections by 2 to 3 percent."
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 996 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (9)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The high price of letting unions die. (Original Post)
sfwriter
Jan 2018
OP
And the rank and file dems, led by Tip ONeill, (sp?) turned on him immediately, forcing
Gabi Hayes
Jan 2018
#3
HR determines Private compensation by factoring Public, Private & Union wages & benefits.
TheBlackAdder
Jan 2018
#5
brush
(53,978 posts)1. See PATCO and Reagan before blaming the demise of unions on Democrats.
sfwriter
(3,032 posts)2. read the article...
...its about right to work and alack of forceful support of labor in the "blue wall" states.
Gabi Hayes
(28,795 posts)3. And the rank and file dems, led by Tip ONeill, (sp?) turned on him immediately, forcing
His first nominee, Ted Sorensen, to withdraw his own name, despite a 61-39 Senate edge
Liberty Under Siege, by Walter Karp
http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Walter_Karp/Reaction_Launched_LUS.html
There is the matter, too, of Theodore Sorensen, President Kennedy's former aide and Carter's choice as director of Central Intelligence. On January 13, the appointment, seemingly unexceptionable, runs into "unexpected difficulties," reports the Times. The Senate Intelligence Committee has been shown two Sorensen affidavits concerning the celebrated "Pentagon Papers"-the classified documentary record of U.S. involvement in Vietnamese affairs. The affidavits say what every member of the committee understands perfectly well: that the classification system is grotesquely overblown, that high-ranking officials, Sorensen included, routinely use "top secret" files in writing their memoirs; that the Pentagon Papers had posed no threat whatever to national security. Fury, nonetheless, sweeps through the Intelligence Committee. Pentagon Papers no threat? Liberals join hands with conservatives, with the John Birch Society, with every rabble-rouser of the Right they can muster, to block the appointment of Sorensen.
The President-elect in Plains, Georgia, knows nothing of this until January 15 when Senator Byrd, at his regular Saturday press conference, announces that Sorensen's confirmation faces "considerable difficulty." What is more, he tells the press, he doesn't think he will endorse Sorensen either. Heep's knife quivers in the director-designate's back. Carter says a few words in Sorensen's defense, but the President-elect has no stomach for this fight. On Monday, January 17, the first day of the confirmation hearings, Sorensen, "with trembling hands," reads to the committee a "strident" defense of his character against "scurrilous and personal attacks," against "outright lies and falsehoods." He defies those "who wish to strike at me, or through me at Governor Carter." Upon saying which he withdraws his name from consideration as
director of Central Intelligence.
The President-elect in Plains, Georgia, knows nothing of this until January 15 when Senator Byrd, at his regular Saturday press conference, announces that Sorensen's confirmation faces "considerable difficulty." What is more, he tells the press, he doesn't think he will endorse Sorensen either. Heep's knife quivers in the director-designate's back. Carter says a few words in Sorensen's defense, but the President-elect has no stomach for this fight. On Monday, January 17, the first day of the confirmation hearings, Sorensen, "with trembling hands," reads to the committee a "strident" defense of his character against "scurrilous and personal attacks," against "outright lies and falsehoods." He defies those "who wish to strike at me, or through me at Governor Carter." Upon saying which he withdraws his name from consideration as
director of Central Intelligence.
Response to brush (Reply #1)
Gabi Hayes This message was self-deleted by its author.
TheBlackAdder
(28,261 posts)5. HR determines Private compensation by factoring Public, Private & Union wages & benefits.
This is mostly for trade, technical, professional and managerial positions.
As unions wages and benefits drop, and public wages and benefits drop, the public sector follows closely.