General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsA Radical Pick for the National Security Council
John Boltons new chief of staff comes from the Center for Security Policy, a group that was largely shunned by conservatives in Washingtonbut is making a comeback in the Trump era.
PETER BEINART 6:00 AM ET
On Wednesday, National-Security Adviser John Bolton chose Fred Fleitzwho for the last five years served as a senior vice president at the Center for Security Policyto be the National Security Councils executive secretary and chief of staff. What makes that choice extraordinary is that, for more than a decade, the Center for Security Policy (CSP) has been arguing that American Muslims who observe shariah, or Islamic law, dont deserve the protections of the First Amendment.
American elites still deal with shariah as just a religious system, declared a 2010 CSP report, when in fact it is as totalitarian a political program as ever were those of communism, fascism, National Socialism, or Japanese imperialism. Thus, American Muslims who are, in the Centers terminology, shariah-adherent, should be treated less like Jews who adhere to Jewish law or Catholics who adhere to Canon law than like American Nazis during World War II. As the Centers president, Frank Gaffney, told congressional staffers in 2010, Shariah is about power, not about faith
far from being entitled to the protections of our Constitution under the principle of freedom of religion, it is actually a seditious assault on our Constitution which we are obliged to prosecute, not protect.
The Center made this argument in depth in a 2015 report it called The Secure Freedom Strategy: A Plan for Victory Over the Global Jihad Movement. Fleitz was one of its 16 co-authors. It called for revoking the citizenship of American Muslims who follow Islamic law. The government, it argued, should use shariah-adherent advocacy and practices as legal premises for deportation and stripping of American citizenship. It must revoke the citizenship of naturalized Americans who, in seeking to insinuate shariah-compliant norms into civil society, have violated their oath of naturalization and allegiance to defend the Constitution of the United States.
The report did not stop there. Over 80 percent of U.S. mosques have been shown to be shariah-adherent, it declared, as evidenced in such visible characteristics as dress, beards, and male-female segregation; the content of preaching and sermons; and printed materials on display or for sale. They are incubators of, at best, subversion and, at worst, violence and should be treated accordingly. To understand what the report means by treated accordingly, its worth noting that Gaffney has cited the 80-percent figure as evidence that the residents of Murfeesboro, Tennessee, should be allowed to block the construction of a mosque in their town.
The report argues that, in seeking to replace the Constitution with shariah law, these mosques are part of a conspiracy led by the Muslim Brotherhood, which also secretly controls some of Americas largest Muslim communal organizations, including the Council on American Islamic Relations, the Islamic Society of North America, and the North American Islamic Trust. The report proposes new legislation that identifies and bans Brotherhood operations like these as hostile or subversive to the U.S. legal order. If thats not possible, it continues, at a minimum, the government should revoke their tax-exemptions since 501(c)(3) status
should be reserved for those institutions not promoting shariah in any way. The report also urges that Americas academic institutions be discouraged from supporting interfaith dialogue, Muslim-Christian understanding, and other programs aimed at promoting tolerance between Muslims and non-Muslims because such work often amounts to promoting shariah.
more
https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2018/06/the-report-on-global-jihad-co-authored-by-a-senior-nsc-official/561680/
DBoon
(22,430 posts)nt