Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTrump may have violated federal law by urging NFL owners not to sign Kaepernick
Trump may have violated federal law by urging NFL owners not to sign Kaepernick
"Tell everybody, you can't win this one. This one lifts me."
Lindsay Gibbs
Jun 2, 2018, 11:28 am
Last month, the NFL announced a new policy for its players during the national anthem: Players are permitted to stay in the locker room during the anthem, but if they go out onto the field during it, they must stand. If any of the players takes a knee, the team will be fined.
Soon afterwards, a Wall Street Journal report confirmed what most have long suspected: That President Donald Trumps public outrage about NFL players protesting police brutality and systemic racism during the national anthem at football games heavily influenced NFL owners to change the rule, and discouraged them from signing players who would protest.
Its all terrible news for those in favor of free speech and peaceful protest, and for those against white nationalism and police brutality.
However, Mark Geragos, the lawyer representing Kaepernick in his collusion lawsuit against the NFL, sees the glass as being half full: He believes that both the anthem rule change and the information about Trumps influence on NFL owners will go a long way towards helping him prove that the NFL and NFL owners colluded to keep Kaepernick out of the NFL, despite the fact that he had the talent to be a starting quarterback in the league.
Geragos also believes that Trumps direct influence over NFL owners on this issue violates federal law. U.S. Code 227 says that members of Congress or the executive branch cannot wrongfully influence a private entitys employment decision solely on the basis of partisan political affiliation.
A few revelations from the last couple of weeks strongly support Geragos case here, and its important to remember that Geragos knows much more about the case than we do he has taken the depositions of more than a dozen NFL owners, while the public only knows about the depositions that have leaked.
more...
https://thinkprogress.org/trump-kaepernick-crime-8136464f87a1/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 595 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trump may have violated federal law by urging NFL owners not to sign Kaepernick (Original Post)
babylonsister
Jun 2018
OP
RockRaven
(15,097 posts)1. It will never happen, but
it would be sweet, sweet irony if Trump's articles of impeachment included this charge.
Wellstone ruled
(34,661 posts)2. Long standing rule in Labor
Negotiations is this,if there is a attempt to or interference in,preventing someone from gainfully obtaining Employment,it is a violation of the Taft-Hartley Act.
Sorry do not remember the Punishment.