Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

babylonsister

(171,112 posts)
Sat Jun 2, 2018, 03:21 PM Jun 2018

Trump may have violated federal law by urging NFL owners not to sign Kaepernick



Trump may have violated federal law by urging NFL owners not to sign Kaepernick
"Tell everybody, you can't win this one. This one lifts me."
Lindsay Gibbs
Jun 2, 2018, 11:28 am


Last month, the NFL announced a new policy for its players during the national anthem: Players are permitted to stay in the locker room during the anthem, but if they go out onto the field during it, they must stand. If any of the players takes a knee, the team will be fined.

Soon afterwards, a Wall Street Journal report confirmed what most have long suspected: That President Donald Trump’s public outrage about NFL players protesting police brutality and systemic racism during the national anthem at football games heavily influenced NFL owners to change the rule, and discouraged them from signing players who would protest.


It’s all terrible news for those in favor of free speech and peaceful protest, and for those against white nationalism and police brutality.

However, Mark Geragos, the lawyer representing Kaepernick in his collusion lawsuit against the NFL, sees the glass as being half full: He believes that both the anthem rule change and the information about Trump’s influence on NFL owners will go a long way towards helping him prove that the NFL and NFL owners colluded to keep Kaepernick out of the NFL, despite the fact that he had the talent to be a starting quarterback in the league.

Geragos also believes that Trump’s direct influence over NFL owners on this issue violates federal law. U.S. Code 227 says that members of Congress or the executive branch cannot “wrongfully influence a private entity’s employment decision … solely on the basis of partisan political affiliation.”


A few revelations from the last couple of weeks strongly support Geragos’ case here, and it’s important to remember that Geragos knows much more about the case than we do — he has taken the depositions of more than a dozen NFL owners, while the public only knows about the depositions that have leaked.

more...

https://thinkprogress.org/trump-kaepernick-crime-8136464f87a1/
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trump may have violated federal law by urging NFL owners not to sign Kaepernick (Original Post) babylonsister Jun 2018 OP
It will never happen, but RockRaven Jun 2018 #1
Long standing rule in Labor Wellstone ruled Jun 2018 #2

RockRaven

(15,097 posts)
1. It will never happen, but
Sat Jun 2, 2018, 03:22 PM
Jun 2018

it would be sweet, sweet irony if Trump's articles of impeachment included this charge.

 

Wellstone ruled

(34,661 posts)
2. Long standing rule in Labor
Sat Jun 2, 2018, 03:46 PM
Jun 2018

Negotiations is this,if there is a attempt to or interference in,preventing someone from gainfully obtaining Employment,it is a violation of the Taft-Hartley Act.

Sorry do not remember the Punishment.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Trump may have violated f...