General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe bigotry against hispanic immigrants needs to be understood in the context of the bigotry
against Catholics which has existed throughout American history. The KKK targeted African Americans -- but also Catholics and Jewish people. In other words, anyone who wasn't a W.A.S.P. (white, anglo-saxon Protestant.)
Though Catholics are the largest denomination of all Christians, there has been only one Catholic President: John Kennedy. It is not a coincidence that yet another hated immigrant group -- refugees from Central and South America -- is made up mostly of Catholics.
This prejudice against Catholics existed long before the Church's positions on birth control and abortion became controversial, in the 1960's and 70's. And it continues even today against Catholics, despite politicians like the Kennedys, Biden, Kerry and others who carefully draw a line between personal religious beliefs and public policy.
http://www.newsweek.com/why-have-there-been-no-catholic-presidents-john-f-kennedy-375401
It seems almost impossible to imagine now that John F. Kennedys Catholicism was a huge issue in the 1960 presidential campaign. His victory in the Democratic primary in West Virginiaa state with a small Catholic populationwas a huge boost to his candidacy because it proved that anti-Catholic prejudice might be waning. In the fall campaign against Richard Nixon, Kennedy traveled to Houston to reassure Protestant ministers that he wouldnt take orders from Rome or let his faith affect his decisions in the Oval Office. "I believe in an America where the separation of church and state is absolute, where no Catholic prelate would tell the president (should he be Catholic) how to act, Kennedy said. Even after he was president, Kennedy gave a big welcome to evangelist Billy Graham, but also met with a Vatican representative and allowed no photographers.
When Kennedy won, it seemed likely that more Catholic presidents would follow but that has not been the case. Theres been only one Catholic presidential nominee among the 28 party nominations since Kennedy, and that was another JFK, John Forbes Kerry in 2004.
There have been an abundance of Catholic vice presidential nominees since 1960, but their Catholicism was often seen as a balance to the Protestant at the top of the ticket. They include William E. Miller, Barry Goldwaters running mate in 1964; Ed Muskie, Hubert Humphreys running mate in 1968; Sargent Shriver, George McGoverns running mate in 1972; Geraldine Ferraro, Walter Mondales running mate in 1984; and Joe Biden, Barack Obamas running mate in 2008, which made Biden the first Catholic elected nationwide since JFK 48 years earlier.
Since 1960, weve seen the election of candidates from much smaller denominations. Richard Nixon was a Quaker. Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton and Al Gore are Baptists. Weve had Greek Orthodox and Mormon presidential nominees (Michael Dukakis and Mitt Romney) and a Jewish vice-presidential nominee (Joe Lieberman).
SNIP
JI7
(89,290 posts)pnwmom
(109,028 posts)of anti-Catholicism.
JI7
(89,290 posts)The numbers overall are close because hispanic catholics went for Hillary in large numbers.
But White Catholics specifically went for trump.
pnwmom
(109,028 posts)the bigotry that oppressed them as Catholics and have directed it at another group.
JI7
(89,290 posts)But that doesn't keep the white protestants and white catholics from hating them.
And black protestants aren't oppresors of white Catholics.
pnwmom
(109,028 posts)Greek Catholics, and Hispanic Catholics that has existed here from the beginning.
JI7
(89,290 posts)Just like they hate black people who are mostly protestants.
pnwmom
(109,028 posts)From The Root:
When the Irish Weren't White
https://www.theroot.com/when-the-irish-weren-t-white-1793358754
The emigrants who land at New York, whether they remain in that city or come on in the interior, are not merely ignorant and poorwhich might be their misfortune rather than their faultbut they are drunken, dirty, indolent, and riotous, so as to be the objects of dislike and fear to all in whose neighbourhood they congregate in large numbers. James Silk Buckingham
These are not quotes from a Trump rally or an alt-right message board. These are historical statements from yesteryear describing a despised race of people in America. They are indicative of the sentiment of white people throughout this country who thought a subhuman species good for nothing but work and servitude might ruin America with their crime, poverty and interbreeding with white women. They were not referring to Africans, Mexicans or Muslims.
They were talking about the Irish.
SNIP
But as we celebrate the first St. Patricks Day of the Trumpian era, we should remember when America passed laws against another group of immigrants. We should recall when this country tried to ban another group of people based on their religion. We should never forget that both American and whiteness are sociopolitical constructs that have evolved over a long period of time, always seeking exclusion and supremacy, and it was not so long ago that Irish Americans were on the outside looking in.
In his book The Renegade History of the United States, Thaddeus Russell explains that the first large wave of Irish immigrants worked low-paying jobsmostly building the canals along the Canadian borderthat other Americans wouldnt do. Like finding out a song you thought was new is actually a 100-year-old remake, the Irish were simultaneously accused of stealing all the good jobs and branded as lazy and shiftless. They were also thought to be the nonwhite missing link between the superior European and the savage African based on stereotypes from the early American media, according to the Boston Globe:
SNIP
JI7
(89,290 posts)Same people are against black people who are largely protestant.
And as i said most white catholics went for trump.
pnwmom
(109,028 posts)are all Catholics.
yeah, right.
JI7
(89,290 posts)Discrminated against.
And large majority of white catholics voted for trump.
treestar
(82,383 posts)You have not cited any poll to support the assertion.
pnwmom
(109,028 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)That article says nothing about Trump or the percentage of white Catholics who voted for him.
pnwmom
(109,028 posts)learned to identify with the oppressor.
And even so, only one Catholic has ever been elected President in American history -- despite the fact that Catholicism is the biggest single Christian denomination.
To put it in another perspective, there has been one Catholic President and one African American President.
22% of the US population were officially Catholic in 2017, though a greater number consider themselves Catholic while not being on Church rolls.
Catholic Church in the United States - Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catholic_Church_in_the_United_States
About 13% of Americans are African American.
http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/02/22/5-facts-about-blacks-in-the-u-s/
More than 40 million blacks live in the United States, making up around 13% of the nations population, according to 2016 Census Bureau estimates.
JI7
(89,290 posts)Than hispanic catholics.
John kerry is catholic and most white catholics voted against him.
EffieBlack
(14,249 posts)Bigotry against Hispanics has absolutely nothing to do with them being Catholic.
Nothing at all.
Otherwise, we'd see a flood of anti-Irish, anti-Italian anti-Spanish immigrants - all of whom come from countries with higher Catholic populations than most Central American countries. The difference, of course, is that the immigrants from those countries are white.
pnwmom
(109,028 posts)Nothing at all.
Otherwise, we'd see a flood of anti-Irish, anti-Italian anti-Spanish immigrants - all of whom come from countries with higher Catholic populations than most Central American countries.
Why would bigotry against Catholics cause us to "see a flood of anti-Irish, anti-Italian, anti-Spanish immigrants"?
The point I was making that Catholic immigrants from Central and Latin America are the latest group of Catholics, over a span of hundreds of years, to be subjected to anti-immigrant bigotry.
Also, I am not excusing white Catholics who voted for DT or don't support refugees from the South. I think they should be especially sensitive to the plight of the refugees, because previous waves of Catholic immigrants have suffered similar bigotry.
From The Root:
When the Irish Weren't White
https://www.theroot.com/when-the-irish-weren-t-white-1793358754
The emigrants who land at New York, whether they remain in that city or come on in the interior, are not merely ignorant and poorwhich might be their misfortune rather than their faultbut they are drunken, dirty, indolent, and riotous, so as to be the objects of dislike and fear to all in whose neighbourhood they congregate in large numbers. James Silk Buckingham
These are not quotes from a Trump rally or an alt-right message board. These are historical statements from yesteryear describing a despised race of people in America. They are indicative of the sentiment of white people throughout this country who thought a subhuman species good for nothing but work and servitude might ruin America with their crime, poverty and interbreeding with white women. They were not referring to Africans, Mexicans or Muslims.
They were talking about the Irish.
SNIP
But as we celebrate the first St. Patricks Day of the Trumpian era, we should remember when America passed laws against another group of immigrants. We should recall when this country tried to ban another group of people based on their religion. We should never forget that both American and whiteness are sociopolitical constructs that have evolved over a long period of time, always seeking exclusion and supremacy, and it was not so long ago that Irish Americans were on the outside looking in.
In his book The Renegade History of the United States, Thaddeus Russell explains that the first large wave of Irish immigrants worked low-paying jobsmostly building the canals along the Canadian borderthat other Americans wouldnt do. Like finding out a song you thought was new is actually a 100-year-old remake, the Irish were simultaneously accused of stealing all the good jobs and branded as lazy and shiftless. They were also thought to be the nonwhite missing link between the superior European and the savage African based on stereotypes from the early American media, according to the Boston Globe:
SNIP
From the UK's The Guardian:
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/sep/12/america-history-of-hating-catholics
America's dark and not-very-distant history of hating Catholics
Pope Francis is expected to be greeted with huge crowds and across-the-board reverence when he tours Washington, New York and Philadelphia during his first visit as pontiff to the United States.
The rapture, however, will not change the awkward and largely forgotten fact that for centuries the US discriminated against Catholics.
The land of immigrants enshrined freedom of religion in the constitution yet spent much of its history despising, harassing and marginalising Catholics.
From the first Puritan settlers to televangelists, leading political, business and religious figures lambasted followers of Rome as theological abominations and traitorous fifth columnists.
treestar
(82,383 posts)There was anti-Irish and anti- Italian feeling at the time they were the largest groups of immigrants. Never underestimate the white ability to be prejudiced. If the US were to be all white, then surely some sub-group would become the others.
EffieBlack
(14,249 posts)Mexicans and Central American Hispanics have been coming here for decades but are still ostracized.
And not because they're Catholic. If this were about their religion, EVERYONE of the same religion would be treated the same way, regardless whether they were white or not, regardless where they came from, regardless how long people from their countries had been coming here.
I'm not sure why people are trying to cover up and dismiss the clear racism involved in the treatment of Hispanics, but the excuses don't fly. This has nothing to do with their religion. Period.
treestar
(82,383 posts)Their being Catholic was the e cause at the time. Now they are assimilated, it doesnt seem to be a big deal.
Xenophobes always claim the latest group is not able to assimilate. Look at 19th century anti-immigrant arguments and they are amazingly the same as they are now.
That they are also another race might factor in to make it take longer though. Xenophobes already dont deal well with differences.
treestar
(82,383 posts)Last edited Tue Jun 12, 2018, 09:15 AM - Edit history (1)
Do you have a cite for that?
I bet their motive is likely to be abortion. Catholics can be quite fanatical about that even if they are otherwise liberal.
pnwmom
(109,028 posts)Joe Kennedy, and other Catholic politicians. Whatever their personal beliefs, they believe their political policies should be separate.
treestar
(82,383 posts)Biden and Kerry are being reasonable and Im sure some Catholics are. But I know the fanatically unreasonable ones
Last edited Tue Jun 12, 2018, 12:46 AM - Edit history (1)
For example:
https://www.americamagazine.org/politics-society/2018/01/24/catholics-are-just-likely-get-abortion-other-us-women-why
Catholics are just as likely to get an abortion as other U.S. women.
According to the latest numbers from the Guttmacher Institute, 24 percent of women who procure abortions identify as Catholic, almost the same as 22 percent of all U.S. women who called themselves Catholic in a 2014 survey by Pew Research Center. In the same sources, evangelical Protestants made up 27 percent of all women in the United States but only 13 percent of those who underwent abortions, revealing a greater reluctance toward choosing abortion, a greater reluctance toward revealing their religion on a survey or both.
http://www.slate.com/blogs/saletan/2014/02/11/catholic_poll_on_abortion_gay_marriage_and_birth_control_europe_and_the.html
To navigate these difficulties, Pope Francis recently instructed bishops to survey their flocks about various social issues. The issues included birth control, premarital sex, divorce, and gay marriage. The purpose of the survey was to reconsider not the churchs teachings but how it communicated those teachings to the faithful.
Catholics in Europe and the U.S. knew what the results would be. Findings released last week in Germany and Switzerland showed a wide gap between the church and its followers. An independent survey released this weekend by Univision confirms a similar gap in the U.S. On every issue, American Catholics are more liberal than the churchs teachings.
The Univision poll found that 54 percent of U.S. Catholics supported same-sex marriage. Fifty-nine percent supported admitting women to the priesthood. Sixty percent thought Catholics who had divorced and remarried outside the church should be eligible to receive communion. Sixty-one percent thought priests should be allowed to marry. Seventy-six percent thought abortion should be permitted at least in some circumstances. Seventy-nine percent supported contraception.
https://www.americamagazine.org/faith/2016/09/28/poll-finds-many-us-catholics-breaking-church-over-contraception-abortion-and-lgbt
Most American Catholics, including those who go to church on a regular basis, have no moral problem with contraception, the survey found.
Just 8 percent said contraception is morally wrong, with 89 percent saying it was either morally acceptable or not a moral issue at all.
SNIP
On the issue of abortion, about half of all U.S. Catholics say it is morally wrong, though that number shoots up to 83 percent among Catholics who attend services regularly.
SNIP
About two-thirds of all U.S. Catholics (64 percent) say that homosexual behavior is either morally acceptable or not a moral issue at all, while 32 percent say its morally wrong.
Volaris
(10,281 posts)Gives me Hope =)
Volaris
(10,281 posts)I say this as a Catholic. I ALSO say, that they represent about the worst kind of Catholicism that could possibly exist in America at the present moment...powerful minds, but they do not necessarily use that power for good...
But that's an interesting perspective, and one I hadn't considered. At the beginning, there was a fear of the Papacy and I can see why it was there. Now, it's just generational bigotry same as any other for sure.
pnwmom
(109,028 posts)should be especially sensitive to the plight of those in the current wave, from Central and South America. Too many of us aren't.
But Pope Francis clearly is.
Volaris
(10,281 posts)Insomuch as my rational mind says it isn't useful, I very much pray for the day when Priests can be Married and be Women can be priests. (I think it would go a long way to attracting converts lol).
I also appreciate that this Pope isn't quite as stupid as some of his predecessors; this motherfucker survived the Dirty Wars, and isn't gonna let the Cardinals intimidate him. He wants to sneak of out of the Vatican to go feed homeless people, and wash the feet of the Locals, good for him that's what he SHOULD be doing.
pnwmom
(109,028 posts)like this one. I wish he was a younger man. With only one lung, I'm afraid he's living on borrowed time.
Volaris
(10,281 posts)But...maybe he'll live to a hundred cause gawd doesn't like to fuck around lol...who knows.
I suspect that either way, he's made his peace with that=).
DFW
(54,527 posts)"In the fall campaign against Richard Nixon, Kennedy traveled to Houston to reassure Protestant ministers that he wouldnt take orders from Rome or let his faith affect his decisions in the Oval Office."
Now, Protestant ministers not only want, but demand that THEIR faith affect decisions made in the oval office.
treestar
(82,383 posts)They arent for separation of church and state for themselves
treestar
(82,383 posts)Are probably a lot of Catholics in offices. And these days it would not be a big issue for very many people.
It would be of interest to learn of how integrated American Catholic Churches are. Are the Hispanic immigrants who are Catholic segregated into different churches ? And is that due to wanting to do masses in Spanish or because white Catholics are bigoted or some combination of factors ?
pnwmom
(109,028 posts)should be more sensitive to the plight of the current wave of Catholic immigrants, because of what our own ancestors went through.
In my experience hispanic immigrants aren't segregated into separate parishes, and I've think I've read that this is least common in Catholic churches (as opposed to other Christian denominations). However, we do have Spanish masses, and I assume most of the people who choose to attend speak Spanish. But anyone speaking any language is welcome to any of the services.
As for the number of Catholics in lower offices, I don't know. But as anyone who supported HRC or Obama for President knows, it also matters who is elected President.
And you would might surprised by the number of people who still are anti-Catholic. Even in my part of the country, where Church affiliation is low, and many people assume nothing about anyone's religion -- I have run into "Christians" who don't consider Catholics to also be Christians. They think we all worship the Pope, or icons, or something.. . .
treestar
(82,383 posts)area with a lot of Polish, Italian and Irish Catholics. People who were not Catholic did not seem to be hostile in any way as of the 60s. It was a big deal at one time, my grandfather who was Catholic married my grandmother who was not, and in the 20s that bothered both sides, but they dealt with it.
malaise
(269,365 posts)taming in the capture of sections of the continent. That fact weighs heavily on their racist hearts and policies.