Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJustice Kagan Refuses to Even Consider Issue that Would Make it Easier to Fire Robert Mueller
by Ronn Blitzer | 11:07 am, June 21st, 2018
The Supreme Court handed down an opinion on Thursday in the case of Lucia v. SEC, which was about whether Administrative Law Judges who issue rulings for the Securities and Exchange Commission are Officers of the United States, or merely employees. The Court ruled that ALJs are indeed Officers covered by the Constitutions Appointments Clause and not mere employees, but they declined to address a related question raised by Solicitor General Noel Francisco that could have had serious implications for Special Counsel Robert Mueller.
In a brief, Francisco asked the Court to address the standard for firing agency employees, which currently requires that it be for cause. Francisco wanted a determination on the constitutionality of imposing such a restriction, claiming that Congress shouldnt be allowed to put limits like this on the presidents (or presidents appointees) ability to fire people. Francisco argued that at the very least, if the for cause standard must remain, cause should be broadly interpreted to mean pretty much any reason.
This was a notable argument, because if President Donald Trump were to fire Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, Francisco would be next in line to take his place as Acting Attorney General in the Russia probe. Current regulations state that the Acting Attorney General is the one with the power to fire a Special Counsel. Rosenstein has said that he would only fire Mueller if there was good cause. Franciscos argument seemed to indicate that his personal standard for cause would be significantly lower.
Justice Elena Kagan, however, was having none of this, addressing the question in a footnote. Kagan noted that the Government first asked the Supreme Court to take up this question a brief at the certiorari stage (when cases are first brought up for the Court to decide whether to hear them), and then tried again later, even after the Court said no. When we granted certiorari, we chose not to take that step, Kagan wrote. The Governments merits brief now asks us again to address the removal issue. We once more decline.
As for Lucias case, the Courts decision was in his favor, ruling that the proceeding in his case was invalid because the ALJ was not hired in accordance with eh Appointments Clause of the Constitution. Because Lucia raised a timely challenge to the ALJs ruling, the Court ordered that he get a new hearing before a new judge.
###
https://lawandcrime.com/supreme-court/justice-kagan-refuses-to-even-consider-issue-that-would-make-it-easier-to-fire-robert-mueller/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
1 replies, 1086 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (11)
ReplyReply to this post
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Justice Kagan Refuses to Even Consider Issue that Would Make it Easier to Fire Robert Mueller (Original Post)
DonViejo
Jun 2018
OP
Raster
(20,998 posts)1. He Clerked for Anton Scalia