General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsStock market performance under Obama/Trump as of Friday's close
Update: For Fun, Stock Market as Barometer of Policy Success (Calculated Risk)
http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2018/06/update-for-fun-stock-market-as.html
Excerpt:
"Note: I don't think the stock market is a great measure of policy performance, but some people do - and I'm having a little fun with them.
There are some observers who think the stock market is the key barometer of policy success. My view is there are many measures of success - and that the economy needs to work well for a majority of the people - not just stock investors.
However, for example, Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin was on CNBC on Feb 22, 2017, and was asked if the stock market rally was a vote of confidence in the new administration, he replied: "Absolutely, this is a mark-to-market business, and you see what the market thinks."
And Larry Kudlow wrote in 2007: A Stock Market Vote of Confidence for Bush: "I have long believed that stock markets are the best barometer of the health, wealth and security of a nation. And today's stock market message is an unmistakable vote of confidence for the president."
. . .
For fun, here is a graph comparing S&P500 returns (ex-dividends) under Presidents Trump and Obama:
Blue is for Mr. Obama, Orange is for Mr. Trump.
At this point, the S&P500 is up 21.3% under Mr. Trump - compared to up 36.0% under Mr. Obama for the same number of market days."
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)Why is it so hard get this point through the skulls of TV talking heads?
Rhetorical question of course.
Silly rabbit, the economy is for billionaires!
kimbutgar
(21,285 posts)One said best economy in my lifetime. And the funniest ever, he has accomplished more than any presidents i this countries history! ( I almost got in a car wreck hearing that one)
Facts dont matter to Twitler supporters.
empedocles
(15,751 posts)you might post a 'logarithmic chart', [more emphasis might show]. Thanks for posting.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)ProfessorGAC
(65,427 posts). . .the trendline is nearly identical. Using 4 years under BHO as the basis, the last 15 months (5 quarters) is within the 95% confidence interval of the predicted performance under Obama. It is below the trend line of that 48 month baseline, and the slope is slightly less steep, but also within the 95% CI.
IOW, there is no policy basis for claiming things are doing better than they were before.
dsc
(52,173 posts)but in fairness to Trump the market was already high when he took over so his improvement is actually more impressive than Obama's who took over a low value market. The market has gone up at a steeper rate than that Obama has at the end of his years. But, the main if not the only, reason for that is the tax cut which let companies buy back stock thus inflating the price. In short, Trump has improved the performance of stocks short term but has done so at the price of long term financial footing. Obama improved stocks by making the underlying economy better.