Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

turbinetree

(24,745 posts)
Wed Jun 27, 2018, 11:14 AM Jun 2018

Supreme court strikes blow against unions with 'fair share' ruling

Non-union members no longer have to pay for representation
Mark Janus argued that ‘fair share’ fees violated his free speech

The supreme court dealt a huge blow to organized labor on Wednesday, ruling that non-union members no longer have to pay their “fair share” for union representation in collective bargaining negotiations.

The closely watched case – Janus v AFSCME – could public unions, according to some experts, and will impact public sector employees in 22 states.

In a 5-4 decision the court overturned a previous decision that had protected the right of public sector unions to collect administrative fees from non-members, ruling it was inconsistent with the first amendment right to free speech.

Without that protection, unions may not only lose fees from non-members but also lose members who are happy with the union’s work but do not want to pay for it. Rightwing activists, who have long campaigned for the decision, are already preparing a nationwide drive to persuade public sector trade unions to stop paying dues following the decision.

Donald Trump celebrated the decision on Twitter, writing: “Big loss for the coffers of the Democrats!” Unions are major donors to the Democratic party.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/jun/27/supreme-court-unions-fair-share-ruling


I think it is appropriate to see how news organization outside of the country looks at this issue, when it comes to labor.............

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Supreme court strikes blow against unions with 'fair share' ruling (Original Post) turbinetree Jun 2018 OP
then they should not get representation. spanone Jun 2018 #1
Yepper, spot on, if you don't like the idea of majority + 1 rule then go to Russia, turbinetree Jun 2018 #2
From scotusblog asiliveandbreathe Jun 2018 #3

turbinetree

(24,745 posts)
2. Yepper, spot on, if you don't like the idea of majority + 1 rule then go to Russia,
Wed Jun 27, 2018, 11:18 AM
Jun 2018

or Communist China, I hate scabs............freeloading scabs.....................

asiliveandbreathe

(8,203 posts)
3. From scotusblog
Wed Jun 27, 2018, 11:20 AM
Jun 2018

In footnote 6 of the majority opinion, the Court suggests that Unions could be allowed to charge nonmembers for representing them in grievance proceedings.


Otherwise, this could put stewards in a very precarious situation..if they knew they were representing a non-dues paying member..I like to call freeloaders...CWA here!!!!! Just sayin'

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Supreme court strikes blo...