General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThere is a way for Dems to block the new Trump Supreme Court Nominee but already a Democrat said
they won't do it.
Once a nomination gets to the full Senate for debate, Democratic senators could filibuster to delay a vote. To end the debate, per Georgetown Law, at least 60 senators need to vote in approval. There are currently 51 Republican senators, 47 Democratic ones, and two Independents, which could mean a blocked, endless debate. However, once the process gets past debate, a nominee only needs a simple majority (i.e. 51 or more senators) vote to get approved. Should there be a tie, the vice president would break it (which, again, would go Republican with Mike Pence).
So there are some bureaucratic measures Democrats could, theoretically, take. However, although Democrats blocked dozens of Trump's nominees for government positions at the beginning of his first term in 2017, per Politico, the process of organizing an effort to delay the appointment of a Supreme Court nomination would take a united message from the Democrats, and political courage of which they haven't shown a lot of lately, particularly with how they've reacted to Rep. Maxine Waters' adversarial approach to dealing with Trump.
Some Democrats are already indicating that they won't do as McConnell did and try to block Kennedy's replacement. Sen. Richard Blumenthal, of Connecticut, said he hoped Trump would appoint a "centrist" and advised against the Senate opting to "artificially delay" the appointment, according to MSNBC correspondent Garrett Haake.
deminks
(11,027 posts)msongs
(67,507 posts)samnsara
(17,667 posts)send faxes hourly round the clock
Rhiannon12866
(206,978 posts)He will try to appoint the most unqualified individual in history as he has every single time. I don't know the solution, but we need to explore every possible option to deny him the chance.
wasupaloopa
(4,516 posts)will give up and next comes trump the fascist dictator.'
Anyone on this board who posts an OP that is designed to divide us should be shunned! Shoud be placed on ignore by everyone!
Control-Z
(15,682 posts)Richard Blumenthal (D-CT): "A confirmation vote should take place after a new Congress is seated."
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100210798271
Maraya1969
(22,523 posts)uponit7771
(90,378 posts)hedda_foil
(16,379 posts)Maraya1969
(22,523 posts)why he changed his mind.
wryter2000
(46,145 posts)No?
Bear Creek
(883 posts)The democrats cannot filibuster. Shummer today said McConnels words back at him. Though it will probably do no good. This will definitely bring out the republican base. Done on purpose. Make polls close then let the voting machine hacking begin. Push the votes. Not a thing has been done to prevent it. By the way all of the voting machines were built by republican companies. The only hope is that trump gets impeached soon.
wryter2000
(46,145 posts)Even if we win it back, we wont take it over until January. Not looking good.
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)have heard from some constituents:
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100210798271
tulipsandroses
(5,141 posts)Thats the problem. Dems wanting to be nice and civil
Azathoth
(4,611 posts)And, so far as I know, the only "bureaucratic measures" that can be taken are basically withholding unanimous consent, which forces Senate proceedings to crawl forward (not to stop). And there is frankly nothing to stop Republicans from changing the rules to limit that as well.