General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhy Texting Beats Email for GOTV
here are two types of text messaging exchanges. Many are likely familiar with warm texting. That means youve got a relationship with the subscriber and theyve opted to hear from you. Organizations have been building these kinds of lists for a while and much like email you can blast messages out to all your subscribers at once.
Cold text messaging involves using people to send messages one at a time to voters based on cell phone numbers purchased from a commercial data vendor. But doesnt that violate the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA)? Well, no, it doesnt, because the texts are not being sent using automated telephone equipment. Rather, theyre being sent one at a time by humans hitting send from a real phone number. Its not much different than phone banking (where you also make unsolicited calls), its just much much faster and less intrusive.
Weve previously shared our research on using cold texts and one-to-one messaging to both turn out voters and to register voters. Our final 2016 experiment dealt with two topics, the first being the traditional warm texts. Vote.org was able to build a giant opted-in text list in 2016 because of the heavy use of the tools we offer on our site. This warm texting experiment was the largest one conducted to date with a total of 324,935 voters.
Our 2016 study showed important findings with effects on par with other non-partisan presidential year GOTV programs:
First and most important, texting works, both the cold and warm varieties. Overall, our study showed a statistically significant 0.5 percent increase in turnout (0.65 percent without factoring in social pressure texts). Sending people their polling place information and engaging in plan-making works to increase turnout.
Second, for one of the test conditions we used some light social pressure messaging. Voters were reminded that whether or not they voted was public record. This has been found to be effective time and time again in other modes of contact. That was not the case with this texting experiment. Social pressure messaging underperformed our other GOTV messages by a margin of 0.4 percentage points with to 0.65 points without.
Finally, doing GOTV using warm texting (0.65 percent) outperformed cold texting (0.2 percent), but the opportunity for scaling is much higher and the acquisition costs much lower for cold texting.
https://www.campaignsandelections.com/campaign-insider/why-texting-beats-email-for-gotv
TygrBright
(20,780 posts)ecstatic
(32,798 posts)I responded to the message after I voted.
NBachers
(17,191 posts)I will not do whatever spam texts tell me to do.
silverweb
(16,402 posts)I really hate phone calls, so the text messages before the California primary were far less intrusive and a real improvement. I responded to each to let them know how much I prefer the text messages.