As of today, Democrats have a decision to make. And Republicans do too. Everybody in this country who has a senator has a decision to make on this too, and it’s very simple, actually. Democrats, presumably, are not, in this circumstance, the doormats that Republicans want them to be, right? Democrats know what happened to them. With Merrick Garland’s seat. Right? Democrats know what happened to President Obama. Having lost a democratically appointed Supreme Court nominee simply on the basis of Republicans punching them in the teeth, holding them down and taking it by force, presumably Democrats have realized they should not ratify that by just going back to regular order now and letting Republicans have this next one, too. Thank you, sir, may I have another. If the purported justification for blocking President Obama from naming a nominee to the court was that it was February of an election year in 2016 when the last vacancy came up, well, hello, it’s June of an election year this year when this vacancy has come up. Why would you not make Republicans hew to the same standard? Democrats are either doormats, or they will insist, at least, on consistency. They will insist that the Kennedy vacancy must be treated the same as the Scalia vacancy, right?