Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCould any republicans be charged as an Accessory After The Fact for their actions?
18 U.S. Code § 3 - Accessory after the fact
Whoever, knowing that an offense against the United States has been committed, receives, relieves, comforts or assists the offender in order to hinder or prevent his apprehension, trial or punishment, is an accessory after the fact.
Except as otherwise expressly provided by any Act of Congress, an accessory after the fact shall be imprisoned not more than one-half the maximum term of imprisonment or (notwithstanding section 3571) fined not more than one-half the maximum fine prescribed for the punishment of the principal, or both; or if the principal is punishable by life imprisonment or death, the accessory shall be imprisoned not more than 15 years.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 684; Pub. L. 99646, § 43, Nov. 10, 1986, 100 Stat. 3601; Pub. L. 101647, title XXXV, § 3502, Nov. 29, 1990, 104 Stat. 4921; Pub. L. 103322, title XXXIII, §§ 330011(h), 330016(2)(A), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2145, 2148.)
Could those like McTurtle and Lindsey Graham be considered to have given trump and company comfort or assistance as noted in the federal code?
Has anything (Devin Nunes) anyone of them have done rise to the level of aid and comfort?
Discuss
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 754 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Could any republicans be charged as an Accessory After The Fact for their actions? (Original Post)
NightWatcher
Jan 2019
OP
c-rational
(2,603 posts)1. I like the concept.
NastyRiffraff
(12,448 posts)2. Let's start with the Turtle
He could end this. There are 4 Republicans going public with their opposition to Trump and his shutdown; there are probably more who are agreeing with them privately. McConnell could bring the vote on the House bills, AND encourage other Republicans to vote for them. He could work for a veto-proof vote; there are close to enough waverers already.
McConnell, though, is compromised. He may be worried about Elaine's job, but I don't think that's enough to make him completely abdicate his responsibilities as Majority Leader.
empedocles
(15,751 posts)3. Conspiracy Law and RICO have very wide reach.
How these laws are used is an open issue.