General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIn the saga of Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez,
I agree in general with her positions. And I feel that she is, and can be, a motivator for younger voters. The example she provided by being elected shows that anyone can run for office.
But along with her new celebrity must come an awareness that she is only one member of 435. Yes, currently a high profile member, but one of 435. And one with zero accomplishments thus far in the House.
And the House of Representatives is an institution with established rules. An institution where seniority counts. An institution where the ability to work with others is critical.
When I was a Union Representative, and when training new Union Reps, I would always remind the new Rep that, no matter your own views, you can only be as hard line as the person ahead of you in the decision chain.
So my hope is that Ms. Ocasio-Cortez holds to her progressive views, and speaks for them, she must also value the consensus building that is a vital part of her new job.
EffieBlack
(14,249 posts)Incoming will be incoming ... because how dare you attack her this way ...
tonedevil
(3,022 posts)who could have predicted the fury and viciousness with which anyone not kowtowing to Rep. Ocasio-Cortez has been attacked in this thread. You really called this one.
EffieBlack
(14,249 posts)You haven't yet gotten the full swarm treatment
tonedevil
(3,022 posts)guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)But thank you for the warning.
JI7
(89,289 posts)crazycatlady
(4,492 posts)Gillibrand was just reelected and is not up again until 2024
empedocles
(15,751 posts)Eliot Rosewater
(31,137 posts)And if she could acknowledge that the green deal idea and others are NOT unique to her, she did NOT create them.
That she is one part of a bigger whole, etc.
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)She is new, and makes great media copy with her quotes, and dancing, and quick replies.
But so was Sarah Palin. Celebrity is no substitute for accomplishment.
My hope is that Ms. Ocasio-Cortez grows into a political example for progressives.
Hekate
(91,013 posts)shanny
(6,709 posts)have been more patient, and learned the ropes, and listened to their elders? Or should they have plowed straight ahead and changed the consensus, instead of accepting it?
SharonAnn
(13,781 posts)BluesRunTheGame
(1,623 posts)MLK had been the pastor of his first church for less than a year before he organized the bus boycott. He was 25 or 26.
AOC is an organizer/ movement leader. Congresswoman is her other job.
EffieBlack
(14,249 posts)First of all, Dr. King didn't "organize" the boycott. The boycott was organized by numerous people in the civil rights establishment. They asked Dr. King to be the efforts' spokesperson.
Please go learn some history.
EffieBlack
(14,249 posts)Neither Dr. King nor John Lewis jumped into the fray and started telling their elders what they were doing wrong. They were very respectful and deferential, listened more than they talked, learned and collaborated before stepping out in front.
Please learn the history of the movement before trying to misuse it to justify a non-equivalent point. You might want to start with "Parting the Waters," the first book in Taylor Branch's trilogy on the civil rights movement.
JI7
(89,289 posts)it's why many still don't know about rosa parks history in the civil rights movement before she refused to move from the bus.
The assumption that Mrs. Parks was a passive victim, that the bus boycott started the civil Rights movement and Dr. King played a larger role in the movement than he actually did are just three of the most galling misperceptions.
However, I can handle that but I have little - actually NO - patience with people who deign to lecture us about how modern day figures compare to these heroes while completely misunderstanding and mischaracterizing what they actually did.
Hekate
(91,013 posts)guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)And anyone who does so knows that a recognition of the rules makes for a more successful leader.
shanny
(6,709 posts)so being "established" is not by definition a good thing, is it? The US govt. with its division of powers and checks and balances was designed to be conservative in the sense of stability--it is difficult to make it move, even without one party determined to prevent any such thing. Given that framework, and faced with a number of enormous challenges, I am biased in favor of those who are not willing to accept the status quo and are not willing to sit quietly. ymmv
What's that old line? "Well-behaved women seldom make history"?
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)shanny
(6,709 posts)guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)AlexSFCA
(6,139 posts)her vote is as powerful as 434 other votes in the house. She is the only representative from her district. Weve been longing for dems like her while witnessing that consensus building over the years has mostly helped the very wealthiest ones. I actually hope that congress doesnt change her. That she doesnt become like almost anyone there worrying about losing the next election.
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)comes in response to more information.
And 1 vote will not get a Bill through Committee.
earthshine
(1,642 posts)And she can dance, too.
I'm 54. If she were my daughter, I'd be insufferably proud. You'd hate to be around me.
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)It gives me hope.
Hekate
(91,013 posts)guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)Experience combined with knowledge is necessary. Speaker Pelosi has both.
whistler162
(11,155 posts)legislation and getting it moved through both houses of Congress is the hard part. Hope she has some good teachers and can listen to their knowledge in the next 11 months, time left until she has to start running for reelection.
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)Tipperary
(6,930 posts)K and r.