Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhat's the Difference Between Steve King and Donald Trump?
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2019/01/steve-king-and-donald-trump-share-same-beliefs/580288/Whats the Difference Between Steve King and Donald Trump?
The congressman from Iowa has drawn rebukes from Republicans for his statements about white supremacy and white nationalism, but he shares many of his views with the president.
11:29 AM ET
Adam Serwer
snip//
It was only after Kings latest remarks that Republicans condemned him with any kind of force. King drew a rebuke from Iowas two Republican senators, House Republicans have said they may take action against the congressman, and other high profile Republican legislators, such as Texas Senator Ted Cruz and South Carolina Senator Tim Scott, have condemned his remarks. The conservative intellectual Henry Olsen warned that the seeds of bigotry could take root in the Republican Party, and National Review called for King to be expelled from Congress, declaring that one of the glories of American history is how we finally shed our shameful racist past.
Hardly. While it is heartening to see that Kings antics have finally drawn a unified response of condemnation from the right, the reactions seem to miss the obvious point that there is little daylight between Steve King and the president of the United States, Donald Trump. (Neither National Reviews editorial nor Scotts op-ed even mention the presidents name.)
But dont take my word for it. In 2014, as Trump was mulling a run for president, he made an appearance in Iowa with King, calling him special guy, a smart person, with really the right views on almost everything, and noting that their views on the issues were so similar that we dont even have to compare notes.
Little has changed. The president has defended white nationalists; sought to exploit the census to dilute the political power of minority voters, described immigration as an infestation, warning that it was changing the culture of Europe; derided black and Latino immigrants as coming from shithole countries, while expressing a preference for immigrants from places like Norway; and generally portrayed non-white immigrants as little more than rapists, drug dealers, and murderers at every opportunity.
Unlike King however, the president has the authority, by himself, to make his views into policy. From his travel ban to his child-separation policy to his revocation of protections for immigrants brought here as children, he has pursued discriminatory policies with a commitment he has shown for few other campaign promises. Even now, the federal government remains shut down, its workforce denied payment for their labor, all in pursuit of the construction of a taxpayer funded symbolic monument of disapproval towards immigrants of Latin American descent.
snip//
Its important that Republicans are taking racism more seriously. But that means not only rejecting backbencher congressmen like King. It means recognizing that King believes little that the man in the White House does not also believe. If the rejection of King is more than political opportunism, more than an attempt to portray the party as rejecting ideas that the president they support has embraced, then the Republican Party and the conservative movement will have to do more than censure King. They will have to reject Trumpism, and all it represents.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
11 replies, 895 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (12)
ReplyReply to this post
11 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
What's the Difference Between Steve King and Donald Trump? (Original Post)
babylonsister
Jan 2019
OP
King was sacrificed on the altar of lip service so the fascist pig Trump would not.
Thomas Hurt
Jan 2019
#7
manor321
(3,344 posts)1. Steve almost just lost his election
That's the only reason they care.
ProudMNDemocrat
(16,899 posts)2. Not much. Trump trusts his ever growing gut.
marble falls
(57,537 posts)3. The difference: Trump doesn't have his suits tailored?
marble falls
(57,537 posts)4. Peter King's sheet isn't urine-stained?
Wellstone ruled
(34,661 posts)5. Well one is a 160 pound pile of garbage and
the other is a 270 pound pile of the same stinking garbage. Other than that,both are a pile of stinking garbage.
akraven
(1,975 posts)6. Not much.
Between the two of them, they might have half a brain.
Thomas Hurt
(13,903 posts)7. King was sacrificed on the altar of lip service so the fascist pig Trump would not.
rurallib
(62,483 posts)8. Strangely enough I wrote almost exactly that to my worthless senator, Ernst
after she finally spoke out against King after 5 fucking years.
I also asked if it would be 5 more years before she stands up against Trump?
no_hypocrisy
(46,312 posts)9. Trump has a loyal base. Steve King, not so much.
Cha
(298,074 posts)10. Puppetrumputin has a bigger Racist
Bully Pulpit.
onecaliberal
(33,008 posts)11. Trump is even more vile.