General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHere is the specific text of Mueller's statement per CNN.
"BuzzFeed's description of specific statements to the Special Counsel's Office, and characterization of documents and testimony obtained by this office, regarding Michael Cohen's Congressional testimony are not accurate," said special counsel spokesman Peter Carr in a statement.
Carr's statement is extremely rare. The special counsel's office has almost never commented on published stories.
This is a breaking story and will be updated.
[link:https://www-m.cnn.com/2019/01/18/politics/mueller-statement-buzzfeed/index.html?r=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cnn.com%2F|
https://www-m.cnn.com/2019/01/18/politics/mueller-statement-buzzfeed/index.html?r=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cnn.com%2F]
brettdale
(12,390 posts)That is really bad.
Response to musicblind (Original post)
elocs This message was self-deleted by its author.
musicblind
(4,486 posts)But they are still running with polling data from 2016 that was within the margin of error.
All they care about is winning and "owning the libs" not being right.
mbusby
(823 posts)musicblind
(4,486 posts)It is what it is.
But the statement is pretty damning, regardless. As I said in that thread, all the Trumpers needed was a sliver of doubt to run with their Fake News narrative. And they will run with it.
They are still running with polling data from 2016...
rockfordfile
(8,709 posts)oberliner
(58,724 posts)His twitter bio identifies himself as GOP.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)now that Mueller has thrown water on it.
It's a joke listening to MSNBC try to cover their rears, and the "former" US Attorneys and experts twisting themselves into a pretzel. Their ideals are in the right place, but this ain't much better than Fox or a Russian bot.
musicblind
(4,486 posts)We can't ever be like the other side, manufacturing the reality we want rather than living in the one we have.
I am still shocked, though, because this pretty much wrecks Buzzfeed. If this is what it appears to be, I don't see how a news organization recovers from a bungle this big. Especially a newer one like Buzzfeed.
Even if the story is only partially inaccurate, the statement still gives Trump and how cohorts tons of cover.
Trust me. I wish this wasn't the case.
rockfordfile
(8,709 posts)Hoyt
(54,770 posts)but it's not going to happen soon, I'm afraid.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)Jesus Christ this is a fiasco
musicblind
(4,486 posts)Though I think it is more likely the reporter's sources fabricated the quotes. No reporter is going to intentionally commit career suicide for no apparent reason.
I think it is very likely the people at Buzzfeed believed this 100% up until, well, now.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)OFFS HE HAS DONE THIS TWICE NOW
Thomas Hurt
(13,903 posts)helpisontheway
(5,008 posts)Persondem
(1,936 posts)Response to musicblind (Original post)
elocs This message was self-deleted by its author.