General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWealthy Brexiteers like James Dyson are jumping ship. Why might that be?
Jonathan Freedland
Dyson, Jacob Rees-Mogg, Nigel Lawson the leave elite appears to want Brexit for everyone else but themselves
Lets give James Dyson the benefit of the doubt. Lets take at face value the assurances issued by his multibillion pound company whose products involve the generation of hot air as to why it is relocating its headquarters from Wiltshire to Singapore.
Apparently, it has nothing to do with Brexit. Whats more, its barely a move at all, since it will see only two people, both top executives, actually moving to Singapore. Dyson will continue to employ 4,000 people in the UK, many of them in research and development, and the relocation is really just about wanting to keep a closer eye on the firms investments in Asia. That it chose to do that in Singapore, where companies pay a mere 17% in tax rather than, say, India or South Korea is surely pure coincidence.
Lets accept all that and agree that the Dyson decision is merely symbolic. Whats it symbolic of? First, its worth remembering the special place in Britains mythology that the company acquired early in its life. Before Dyson, so the story went, we were terrific at inventing bright ideas but rubbish at turning those ideas into profitable businesses. Brits would have the lightbulb moment, but when it came to manufacturing the actual bulbs, that work and profit would be shipped far away.
Then along came James Dyson, hailed by successive governments, who proved it didnt have to be that way. A British idea produced a British business. Well, that story has now come full circle. With its headquarters in Singapore, Dyson will no longer be a British firm. Indeed, the CEO, Jim Rowan, has asked that from now on it be referred to as a global technology company.
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/jan/23/james-dyson-brexiteer-elite-brexit-rees-mogg
-snip-
Recall the gap between Jacob Rees-Moggs position as leader of the European Research Group and his stance as co-founder of, part-time worker for and 15% stakeholder in Somerset Capital Management which has warned its investors of the dangers of a hard Brexit and which has now set up not one but two funds in Dublin. Recall too the advice from fellow arch-Brexiteer John Redwood, who has a sideline as chief global strategist for the Charles Stanley investment bank, suggesting a year after the Brexit referendum that those with money pull it out of Britain and look further afield.
Whether its Nigel Farage taking care to ensure two of his children can live, work and travel freely across the EU by having German passports, or Nigel Lawson, who lives in France, taking the precaution of applying for French residency, the pattern is familiar. It suggests a Brexiteer elite who believe that the pain of Brexit is for the little people. They are rich or powerful or connected enough to be insulated from the damage it will cause, making them free to sound off about its supposed benefits in the abstract sovereignty! control! while everyone else deals with the grim reality.
So Dyson and his base will be safe in Singapore, leaving Britain to deal with the consequences of the disastrous decision he demanded. With every day the mess of Brexit is becoming clearer, and it will take more than a high-priced vacuum cleaner to clear it up no matter how much it sucks.
Jonathan Freedland is a Guardian columnist
geardaddy
(24,933 posts)Then he turns 180° and is pro-Brexit.
sarcasmo
(23,968 posts)ProfessorPlum
(11,280 posts)Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)Brexit was never, ever about "economic issues", it was about trying to cut off the influx of dark-skinned immigrants...