General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Supreme Court may kill Roe v. Wade as soon as this week
The final days of the right to choose are nigh.
IAN MILLHISER
JAN 28, 2019, 4:38 PM
Lawyers representing a Louisiana abortion clinic and at least two physicians filed an application in the Supreme Court on Monday asking the court to halt a Louisiana law that is identical to a Texas law the justices struck down in 2016.
The court is almost certain to deny this application in a 5-4 vote possibly as soon as tonight. When it does so, it will effectively mark the end of Roe v. Wade.
Yes, the court is very unlikely to hand down an opinion this week which uses the words Roe v. Wade is overruled. But these abortion providers filed this application because a federal appeals court openly defied the Supreme Courts most recent abortion decision. When the court refuses to enforce its own decision, that will send a clear signal to lower court judges throughout the country that they are free to uphold restrictions on abortion.
The case is June Medical Services v. Gee.
Gee involves a Louisiana law requiring a physician performing or inducing an abortion to have active admitting privileges at a hospital that is located not further than thirty miles from the location at which the abortion is performed or induced and that provides obstetrical or gynecological health care services. If that law sounds familiar, thats because it is identical, almost word-for-word, to a Texas law that the Supreme Court struck down in Whole Womans Health v. Hellerstedt.
https://thinkprogress.org/supreme-court-may-kill-roe-v-this-week-a014778b1db9/
-snip-
The smart money, however, will bet that the court will vote along party lines to deny a stay of the Fifth Circuits decision. Just last May, while Kennedy was still on the court, the Supreme Court allowed an Arkansas anti-abortion law to take effect despite the fact that a lower court decision upholding that law was also at odds with Whole Womans Health. And the court has only grown more anti-abortion since May.
Should the Supreme Court deny a stay in the Gee case, moreover, anti-abortion judges will know exactly what that means. It will be a clear signal that they can emulate the Fifth Circuit and openly defy Supreme Court decisions protecting a right to abortion.
Roe v. Wade will die a quiet death, the Supreme Court wont even have to kill it.
IN my opinion, the last two right wing Federalist Society Justices on this court should be impeached and or annulled, and "all" of the judges coming through the corrupt Mitch McConnell system should also be removed...........
democratisphere
(17,235 posts)FakeNoose
(32,908 posts)... but if they do this, it would mobilize every non-fundie voter in the US to vote for Democrats in 2020. It would prove how stupid and dangerous these people are to ALL Americans, not just the libs/progressives.
Here's a clue: even the Libertarians are against overturning Roe v. Wade. If they say they aren't, they're lying to throw a bone to the "religious right."
LongtimeAZDem
(4,494 posts)Response to turbinetree (Original post)
ProudMNDemocrat This message was self-deleted by its author.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)ProudMNDemocrat
(16,897 posts)Perhaps I meant to say the religious anti-abortion women who rally for Trump.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)Charming.
TexasBushwhacker
(20,254 posts)I would have just told him
FUCK YOU
cwydro
(51,308 posts)Unbelievable to read this crap here. Smh.
ProudMNDemocrat
(16,897 posts)One of them is my very own sister, who had 2 abortions herself post Roe. Her deep religious views has alienated many of her firends, she judges me,, we differ on many fronts. Religion and politics are taboo subjects.
I will not gloss over that fact that I am acquainted with many women who profess to be Pro-Life, when they are Pro-Birth because they vote time after time for Republicans who oppose programs like Head Start, Heating and Housing Assistance, SNAP, WIC, Planned Parenthood, programs that help the poor move up. Some of those women protest in front of our local PP clinic here that does not have abortion services .
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)The post was offensive. The "edit" didn't help. And the lame justification/excuse being offered only makes it worse.
pamela
(3,469 posts)That is some serious ageist, sexist bullshit.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)ORIGINAL:
EDIT:
cwydro
(51,308 posts)And clueless. Wow.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)When someone tries to make excuses and justify that type of behavior and attitude... it really lets me know what kind of person they are. That's unacceptable to me.
cwydro
(51,308 posts)And speaking as a woman, a gay one at that, Ive never heard of a dried up vagina.
Really an ignorant statement.
Hassin Bin Sober
(26,358 posts)NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)EffieBlack
(14,249 posts)nolabear
(42,004 posts)Buddy, youd better look again at whos trying to save our asses in this country and BOW DOWN to those women.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)... and just made it worse. It really does reveal someone's mindset when they try to self-excuse their inexcusable behavior.
nolabear
(42,004 posts)cwydro
(51,308 posts)Wow, really?
demmiblue
(36,915 posts)Blaukraut
(5,695 posts)cwydro
(51,308 posts)Thank you!
2naSalit
(86,943 posts)Wow, sexist much?
Time for a rude awakening for this one.
Freethinker65
(10,107 posts)obamanut2012
(26,183 posts)Delete this misogynistic bullshit.
ProudLib72
(17,984 posts)handing out packets of KY jelly?
curlyred
(1,879 posts)NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)spanone
(135,929 posts)CousinIT
(9,273 posts)SweetieD
(1,660 posts)Cases heard on abortion and it could be overturned. Someone on here said I was being paranoid and it would take years.smdh.
EffieBlack
(14,249 posts)None of which, I'm sure, have anything to do with their degree of vaginal moisture.
Shame on you for posting such ageist sexist crap.
FakeNoose
(32,908 posts)... whether I should be a mother or not, and it's every other woman's personal decision to make. I could be against abortion (maybe even for religious reasons) but I have no right to make somebody else's decision FOR THEM based on MY religion. That's why our laws need to be pro-choice, and for the most part they are pro-choice, thanks to the Roe v. Wade decision.
EffieBlack I don't believe the Supreme Court will get bogged down in this, it's established law now.
Buckeyeblue
(5,505 posts)The bill should say that a woman's reproductive choices are between her and her medical provider.
ProudLib72
(17,984 posts)And, if so, does this put pressure on him? Also, suppose abortion was overturned and Kavanope was later impeached; would the decision be called into question?
scarytomcat
(1,706 posts)some how we need to get them removed maybe
we can sue and remove the trump administration because the election was fraudulent and everything that came from this fraud should be reversed
Polybius
(15,525 posts)The only way to remove them is to impeach them. We'll never get 67 votes needed to convict for that reason.
McCamy Taylor
(19,240 posts)Suddenly the right wing will be like "Why didn't she go to New York for an abortion? How irresponsible! The taxpayer should not pay for her selfishness!"
Polybius
(15,525 posts)It's almost certain that they decide one way or another by tomorrow.