General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSteve Schmitd on Nicolle Wallace's show: Shultz "is not Jill Stein! He's not Ross Perot!"
January 30th...the day I officially stopped listening to Steve Schmidt, no matter what he has to say.
stonecutter357
(12,699 posts)LakeArenal
(28,889 posts)He gets more love than Avenatti .
BannonsLiver
(16,548 posts)Steves gone round the bend, Im afraid. Hes blathering about 2 empty chairs in Schultz boardroom.
One for the customer. The other for the employees.
Caliman73
(11,760 posts)I can appreciate that people enjoyed him going hard at Trump. He did have some very artful take downs. It seemed however, that people were too willing to jump on the "Schmidt is the most courageous person..." train, forgetting that he was never attacking conservatism. He was attacking Trump for pulling the veneer from conservatism. Trump is greedy, corrupt, and bigoted, which seem to be the central tenets of conservatism. Schmidt never changed, he just wants Trump to stop showing the ugliness and go back to the time where Reagan dressed the ugliness up with the style of a B list actor. Trump is a D list celebrity at best.
BannonsLiver
(16,548 posts)SMH
madaboutharry
(40,247 posts)I appreciated his anti-Trump comments since the election. But Steve Schmidt is not a Democrat and he still believes in right wing political ideals. No doubt Schultz is paying him well.
We shouldnt be surprised.
hlthe2b
(102,561 posts)as any of us.
LakeArenal
(28,889 posts)She and Rosie remain good friends and both fired from the View apparently for disparaging Donald...
CincyDem
(6,419 posts)I too count today as my unfriend day with Steve.
For all his understanding of the American political landscape, his purposeful denial of the our two party reality is beyond me.
The phrase that comes to mind is never expect a man to understand that for which he is paid to not understand.
I thought Steve had some standards. Oops.
BannonsLiver
(16,548 posts)I always assumed Schmidt and Rick Wilson etc. would return to RWNJ politics and wed all go back to hating each other. What i didnt anticipate is the mutation actually occurring DURING the orange anus reign. Steve sounded rational for a while, in the early days of Trump, but hes sounding nuttier than squirrel shit right now.
Miles Archer
(18,837 posts)He's been hit over and over on Twitter to switch parties, each time he returns a curt "no."
Right now, he's a needed voice during the Trump catastrophe. If he returns to his "roots" after this...assuming there is a party for him to return to...that's his business. If he becomes a pro-Republican voice, I'll simply stop listening. My guess is that will take at least several election cycles for that to happen. Ryan is gone, hopefully in 2020 McConnell will be gone as well. Problem is that even if the turtle is voted out, you still have Mulvaney, Meadows and McCarthy straining at the bit to be king of the far-far-far right hill.
If Schultz wakes up and smells his own coffee and we have a two-party election without another Jill Stein to gum up the works, Trump could be gone. The caveat in that is that he will pull every voter suppression trick in the book before Election Day 2020 arrives.
BannonsLiver
(16,548 posts)Ive never for one minute believed when Trump was over well all lock arms and everyone will become a progressive. There will always be the other side.
fleur-de-lisa
(14,629 posts)He can't be serious about Schultz as a viable candidate.
Oh, wait, Schmitd tried to give us SARAH PALIN.
Never mind. Carry on.
Miles Archer
(18,837 posts)The Wallace segment was regulatory. He was hit from all sides but it wasn't as if he was defending his position with passion. It was more like he stood firm on ridiculous prepared talking points, such as Schultz "promising he won't be a spoiler," and the sheer ridiculousness of that statement is that he has NO CONTROL over that. It's all in voter perception. The ONLY way for him to NOT be a spoiler is to scrap his plans, because if he drops out before he gets in, he damned sure won't get enough write-in votes to matter.
lilactime
(657 posts)ReformedGOPer
(478 posts)to the days when I disliked him intensely. He is basically trying to get a moderate candidate in the race because his beloved GOP went nutso. No thanks Stevie. We lived through Bernie and Jill, and we can't afford a repeat.
JI7
(89,289 posts)tenderfoot
(8,443 posts)told you so
uponit7771
(90,371 posts)Gothmog
(145,965 posts)uponit7771
(90,371 posts)csziggy
(34,140 posts)NastyRiffraff
(12,448 posts)Otherwise, he's just another Republican.
DeminPennswoods
(15,299 posts)But he's a standard issue "country club" conservative, pro-business, low taxes, fewer regulations and not so fixated on wedge issues like abortions. Schmidt does believe in government and governing, though. He did his job trying to get his talking points out there, but Wallace has played that game, too, and she did a decent job pushing back.
Jason Johnson had the best retort, he said he didn't even know any Dems or why any Dems worry about Schultz because he will attract "never Trumpers like you (Schmidt)", not Democratic voters.
Maybe 3 or 4 years ago, someone like Schultz was more in line with the mood in America, but in 2019, he's out of step. Americans don't want more of the same which is basically what Schultz is trying to sell. I think Schultz has 0 charisma and has already showed disdain for everyone not in his income class by his comments on cutting entitlements and not even being able to guess the cost of a box a cereal, something work-a-day families with kids know very well. I expect him to deflate as soon as his book tour (I wouldn't be surprised if his candidacy isn't a ploy to increase sales) is over.