Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSupreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas calls for re-examining landmark libel case
https://www.arkansasonline.com/news/2019/feb/19/supreme-court-justice-clarence-thomas-calls-re-exa/?latestI had forgotten Thomas was still on the bench; but he seems to have lost his muzzle and is now channeling Anton Scalia.
WASHINGTON Justice Clarence Thomas says the Supreme Court should consider overturning a 55-year-old landmark ruling that makes it hard for public figures to win libel suits, writing in a case involving a woman who says Bill Cosby raped her.
Thomas took aim at New York Times v. Sullivan and similar cases that followed it, calling them "policy-driven decisions masquerading as constitutional law."
"We should not continue to reflexively apply this policy-driven approach to the Constitution," Thomas wrote in a 14-page opinion that no other justice joined.
The opinion comes against the backdrop of President Donald Trump's repeated calls to make it easier to sue for libel. Last weekend, Trump reacted to a Saturday Night Live skit by asking on Twitter, "How do the Networks get away with these total Republican hit jobs without retribution? Likewise for many other shows? Very unfair and should be looked into."
On Tuesday, the high court rejected an appeal from actress Kathrine McKee, who said Cosby raped her in 1974. McKee sued Cosby for damaging her reputation after a lawyer for the comedian allegedly leaked a letter attacking McKee. Two lower courts ruled against her and dismissed the case, based largely on McKee's role as a public figure.
snip
He is not the first justice to criticize the 1964 case, though he appears to be the first to issue a call for its reconsideration in a Supreme Court opinion. The late Justice Antonin Scalia took a similarly dim view of the Sullivan ruling, once saying in a televised interview that he abhorred it.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 778 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas calls for re-examining landmark libel case (Original Post)
WhiteTara
Feb 2019
OP
mahina
(17,770 posts)1. Now why would he want to do that ? Oh right, Chump.
jaysunb
(11,856 posts)2. Thomas finally said something I agree with. Damn n/t
a kennedy
(29,779 posts)3. Yah, isn't this the first time he's opened his mouth???
BumRushDaShow
(130,043 posts)4. What's scarier is
as someone whose normal opinions are no more than 1 page, he found time to actually write 14 pages!
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/18pdf/17-1542_ihdk.pdf (PDF file)
former9thward
(32,165 posts)6. His opinions are the same length as the other Justices.
As someone who has to read them I wish the Justices would write one page opinions.
Squinch
(51,090 posts)5. Reconsider Citizens United first, Clarence.