Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

mopinko

(70,388 posts) Thu Feb 21, 2019, 08:07 PM Feb 2019

2

if the judge had thrown stone in jail,

it would have made her responsible for the safety of a witness in an counter intelligence case against the president of the united states.
i wouldnt want that on my hands.

3 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

if the judge had thrown stone in jail, (Original Post) mopinko Feb 2019 OP

She went the extra mile to show that she wasn't being prejudicial, and made it clear that LongtimeAZDem Feb 2019 #1

Good judges don't throw stones. Yonnie3 Feb 2019 #2

Bwahahahaha, excellent! n/t monmouth4 Feb 2019 #3

LongtimeAZDem

(4,494 posts)

1. She went the extra mile to show that she wasn't being prejudicial, and made it clear that

Reply to mopinko (Original post)

Thu Feb 21, 2019, 08:10 PM

Feb 2019

if his bail is revoked will be his own fault.

Yonnie3

(17,516 posts)

2. Good judges don't throw stones.

Reply to mopinko (Original post)

Thu Feb 21, 2019, 08:14 PM

Feb 2019

Sorry, I'll show myself out.

monmouth4

(9,712 posts)

3. Bwahahahaha, excellent! n/t

Reply to Yonnie3 (Reply #2)

Thu Feb 21, 2019, 10:39 PM

Feb 2019

Reply to this discussion

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»if the judge had thrown s...