General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsA question for folks hee: Could Mueller be releasing an initial report?
With all the news about Mueller releasing a report, I was wondering: Could Mueller release an initial report or does this have to a be a final report?
After all, Mueller seems to have many areas to cover that haven't been addressed publicly. There's the tRump Tower meeting, the foreign money in the inauguration, the whole Carter Page thing, tRump Tower Moscow, Facebook & Putin, the change in the GOP platform to being pro-Russia, and so on, ad infinitum.
I really don't know the requirements of what Mueller must release. Given the massive amount of shady dealing between tRump and the Russians, I would think that an initial report that detailed some of progress and set out what still needed to be done would make sense.
Is this idea of an intermediate report a realistic possibility?
Pantagruel
(2,580 posts)Outlining progress to date and avenues of criminality that still need to be probed.
struggle4progress
(118,379 posts)mr_lebowski
(33,643 posts)Plus the AG can basically just come in and require whatever he wants from Mueller, given he's not recused. Can fire him, make him give him status reports, he can do whatever he wants. I think he'd have to remove Rosenstein as head of the investigation first though.
Blanks
(4,835 posts)Mueller only needed to investigate Trump because the govermment was controlled by republicans. The house can and will subpoena records and persons as needed.
Mueller has gotten the ball rolling, but the house has this from here.
mr_lebowski
(33,643 posts)It's not even close, really.
Blanks
(4,835 posts)But look at the damage house investigations conducted by republicans did to Hillary Clinton.
Nobodys going to jail anyway, at least its not swept under the rug. Itll still get the attention of the press.
watoos
(7,142 posts)Not partial in the sense of an issue not being completed but why can't he release his findings of obstruction but hold back his findings on conspiracy to a later date?
frazzled
(18,402 posts)And it's different than I thought. From an Op-Ed in the NYT by Neal Katyal (acting solicitor general under Obama and Georgetown law professor)
A concise report will probably act as a road map to investigation for the Democratic House and to further criminal investigation by other prosecutors.
The special counsel Robert Mueller will apparently soon turn in a report to the new attorney general, William Barr. Sure, there is still a lot of activity, including subpoenas, flying around, but that shouldnt stop Mr. Mueller.
The report is unlikely to be a dictionary-thick tome, which will disappoint some observers. But such brevity is not necessarily good news for the president. In fact, quite the opposite.
For months, the presidents lawyers have tried to discredit Mr. Mueller and this report, but their efforts may have backfired. A concise Mueller report might act as a road map to investigation for the Democratic House of Representatives and it might also lead to further criminal investigation by other prosecutors. A short Mueller report would mark the end of the beginning, not the beginning of the end.
The report is unlikely to be lengthy by design: The special counsel regulations, which I had the privilege of drafting in 1999, envision a report that is concise, a summary of what he found. And Mr. Muellers mandate is limited: to look into criminal activity and counterintelligence matters surrounding Russia and the 2016 election, as well as any obstruction of justice relating to those investigations.
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/21/opinion/mueller-report-trump-democrats-barr.html?fallback=0&recId=1HVFymvEo2zLV6YrUaK3P4g7xgP&locked=0&geoContinent=NA&geoRegion=IL&recAlloc=top_conversion&geoCountry=US&blockId=most-popular&imp_id=645647054&action=click&module=Most%20Popular&pgtype=Homepage
watoos
(7,142 posts)if it doesn't get to see the full report?