General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums"No collusion"?
How long before we find out that Trump had a secret meeting with Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov while he was in Hanoi?
There is still a lot of evidence of collusion, contrary to what Cohen suggested in his hearing yesterday.
There are simply too many secret meetings between Trump and the Russian leaders to write off as non-consequential, in my opinion. We still do not know what Trump and Putin discussed in their secret meetings.
And why is Trump so obsessed about "collusion"? He sounds like his hand is stuck in the cookie jar and he can't get it out...
Tommy_Carcetti
(43,232 posts)Defining it is about as useful as defining socialism or obscenity.
What Cohen testified to no doubt placed Trump as the party with knowledge and assent to his campaigns dealings with Russia.
It was damning, and that was the open testimony. Who knows what will be revealed in todays closed testimony.
kentuck
(111,111 posts)I suspect the information in the closed hearings is much more damaging and telling.
still_one
(92,526 posts)or what comes from the SDNY
kentuck
(111,111 posts)...and to give their investigations more credibility.
It would make it more difficult for the Republicans to criticize.
But they should continue to investigate after the Mueller report, unless Mueller indicts or recommends impeachment for high crimes and misdemeanors.