Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

CousinIT

(9,278 posts)
Fri May 3, 2019, 09:41 AM May 2019

Does the media amplify The Devil's propaganda without dispute? YES. EVIDENCE....



I went into this study questioning whether anecdotal reports of media amplifying Trump's misinformation with bad headlines and tweets might be overstated due to confirmation bias.

The data turned out to show much worse media performance than I expected. https://www.mediamatters.org/blog/2019/05/03/study-major-media-outlets-twitter-accounts-amplify-false-trump-claims-average
11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

hlthe2b

(102,575 posts)
1. This is why I was so thrilled to see Brian Williams & Nicolle Wallace break in on Barr's testimony
Fri May 3, 2019, 09:44 AM
May 2019

to do REAL TIME correction of lies.

EVERY damned MSM reporter, producer, executive needs to take this to heart.

 

bitterross

(4,066 posts)
2. The "media" is no one's friend or enemy. It's its own for-profit entity
Fri May 3, 2019, 09:46 AM
May 2019

The media exists for-profit only now. This didn't used to be the case. They amplify anything that will get ratings and clicks. That will improve their ability to charge higher prices for advertising.

They are not really the champions of democracy any longer.

hlthe2b

(102,575 posts)
3. Important Note: "The Twitter feed of The Hill was by far the worst offender!"
Fri May 3, 2019, 09:48 AM
May 2019
The Twitter feed of The Hill, which has 3.25 million followers, was by far the worst offender we reviewed, producing more than 40 percent of the tweets that pushed Trump’s misinformation without context over the entire study. It promoted Trump’s falsehoods without disputing them 175 times -- an average of more than eight per day. These numbers are so high in part because the outlet tweets about Trump far more frequently than other outlets, generating about a quarter of the total data. That high volume led to the outlet tweeting about false or misleading Trump claims 200 times. The feed rarely disputes the Trump claims it tweets about, instead simply passing along the misinformation 88% of the time. The Hill also frequently resends the same tweet at regular intervals, not only amplifying his falsehoods, but also making it more likely that the misinformation will stick with its audience through the power of repetition.

hlthe2b

(102,575 posts)
4. After the Hill, also problematic, ABC newsfeeds; CBS less so, MSNBC even less, but still problem
Fri May 3, 2019, 09:49 AM
May 2019
Several Twitter feeds controlled by ABC News that we reviewed also stood out, failing to fact-check the president’s misinformation 71% of the time. Many of these cases came when the feeds tweeted Trump quotes and embedded video without additional context during or immediately following Trump events.

ABC News’ main Twitter feed (14.3 million followers) sent 23 tweets promoting false or misleading Trump claims, failing to dispute the president’s misinformation 74% of the time.

The network’s politics feed (733,000 followers) sent 25 tweets promoting false or misleading Trump claims, failing to dispute the president’s misinformation 64% of the time.

The feed for its evening news broadcast, World News Tonight (1.35 million followers), sent 13 tweets promoting false or misleading Trump claims, failing to dispute the president’s misinformation every single time.

The feed for its Sunday political talk show, This Week (166,000 followers), sent 21 tweets promoting false or misleading Trump claims, failing to dispute the president’s misinformation 64% of the time

 

Wellstone ruled

(34,661 posts)
11. Agree one million percent.
Fri May 3, 2019, 12:02 PM
May 2019

And we are seeing a further drift from fact to false equivalency model as we move further into the Campaign Season.

All about the bottom profit line.

Iliyah

(25,111 posts)
5. And yet shithole is still very
Fri May 3, 2019, 09:50 AM
May 2019

unpopular. If corporate media did correct with truth and facts, he would be in the gutter.

hlthe2b

(102,575 posts)
6. Notable (twitter) Exceptions
Fri May 3, 2019, 09:52 AM
May 2019
Notable exceptions

Some feeds entirely avoided passing on Trump’s misinformation over the course of the study. NPR’s main feed, which tweeted only 20 times about Trump quotes, debunked the misinformation in all four false claims it tweeted about.

Other Twitter feeds limited the exposure their audience had to Trump’s misinformation by minimizing their focus on Trump’s comments. For example, the feed for Meet The Press, the NBC News Sunday political talk show, failed to dispute Trump’s falsehoods 83% of the time. But it rarely tweeted about Trump comments, with such tweets making up only 9% of the outlet’s total tweets about Trump. CNN’s main Twitter feed similarly referenced Trump quotes in only 11% of the tweets about him, while doing somewhat better at fact-checking Trump, disputing his false claims 75% of the time.

The Washington Post’s feed disputed Trump’s misinformation at the highest rate of any feed we studied that tweeted about 10 or more false Trump claims. Out of 37 tweets about false or misleading

marylandblue

(12,344 posts)
7. Trump knew they would do this, which is why he tweets without fear of getting caught.
Fri May 3, 2019, 10:02 AM
May 2019

Democrats have to admit is very smart with media, not keep dismissing him as stupid in everything. He has a talent for media manipulation.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Does the media amplify Th...