General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsGeorgia D.A. Says He Would Prosecute Women Who Get Abortions
https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/george-d-a-says-he-will-prosecute-women-who-get-abortions-836145/Georgia D.A. Says He Would Prosecute Women Who Get Abortions
Women need to be made aware, says Douglas County District Attorney Ryan Leonard. The only way to be 100% sure youre not prosecuted under it is not to have an abortion.
Douglas County District Attorney Ryan Leonard told Law.coms Daily Report on Wednesday that women in Georgia should prepare for the possibility that they could be criminally prosecuted for having an abortion if the law signed by Governor Brian Kemp takes effect as planned in January of next year.
If you look at it from purely a legal standpoint, if you take the life of another human being, its murder, Leonard told the outlet. Leonard is the first of the states district attorneys to declare that interpretation of the law publicly. Others, including the district attorneys for DeKalb and Macon counties, have said they would not seek to prosecute women under the new law.
-----
Whatever legislators intended, Leonard said, is irrelevant at this point; district attorneys like himself are guided by the law as written, and the LIFE Act is written in a way that anticipates the criminal prosecutions of mothers. Leonard pointed to exceptions written into the law, including one clause that exempts from prosecution any pregnant woman who reasonably believed that an abortion was the only way to prevent a medical emergency.
They wouldnt outline exceptions or exemptions if they didnt anticipate criminal prosecution, Leonard said. Based on my review, the only crime it could fall under is murder. Nothing else criminalizes this conduct.
irisblue
(33,067 posts)yes that term has been used by Republican RW
source--https://www.orlandosentinel.com/politics/os-ne-jose-oliva-host-body-20190301-story.html
snip--
House Speaker Jose Oliva apologized Friday for repeatedly using the term host body to describe pregnant women.
As technology moves along, a human body can exist outside of its host body earlier and earlier, Oliva, R-Miami Lakes, told Jim DeFede of CBS Miami in a Thursday interview. And so then one has to think, until what time does the host body have veto power over this other life?
The question is: What is the value of that life? And is it subordinate to the value of its host body?
snip--"The reaction undoubtedly shows it had the exact opposite effect, Oliva said. I apologize for having caused offense, my aim was the contrary. This is and will continue to be our societys greatest challenge. I strongly believe both mother and child have rights and the extent and balance of those rights remain in question. I regret my wording has distracted from the issue. My apologies to all.
In the same interview, Oliva said bills restricting abortion were not among his main priorities in the new legislative session, which begins Tuesday."
more at source. (And why have the Dems in Fla stopped screaming about this fool?)
raccoon
(31,138 posts)Freethinker65
(10,119 posts)Celerity
(43,804 posts)Ilsa
(61,721 posts)for women needing to visit with Dutch Dr. Gomperts about using prescription medicine to end a pregnancy.
roamer65
(36,748 posts)fucking scumbag.
Women can travel to states where abortion is legal and there isnt a damn thing he can do about it.
StarfishSaver
(18,486 posts)I hope this wakes voters up and spurs them to fight against voter suppression everywhere.