Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMueller to citizens: "Impeach first, then indict. At all costs preserve the evidence."
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
9 replies, 1049 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (18)
ReplyReply to this post
9 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Mueller to citizens: "Impeach first, then indict. At all costs preserve the evidence." (Original Post)
Bernardo de La Paz
May 2019
OP
Obviously a paraphrase. Technically you are correct, but obviously a paraphrase to
Bernardo de La Paz
May 2019
#2
Yes. As Gloria Berger paraphrased Mueller: "My hands are tied. Yours are not." . . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
May 2019
#7
Feels like it might be the tipping point & I'm wondering if I should advocate for
Bernardo de La Paz
May 2019
#8
Yes, it is only legal indictment of sitting president (now). Remove him / de-elect then charge court
Bernardo de La Paz
May 2019
#6
Baitball Blogger
(46,787 posts)1. Don't use quotes, unless he actually said it.
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,089 posts)2. Obviously a paraphrase. Technically you are correct, but obviously a paraphrase to
to counteract your bait posting Mueller is the worst human (another obvious paraphrase, this time hyperbolic, but not far from the opinions you expressed in thread you started and others).
Claritie Pixie
(2,199 posts)3. Yes. Those who are upset at Mueller didn't listen to his words.
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,089 posts)7. Yes. As Gloria Berger paraphrased Mueller: "My hands are tied. Yours are not." . . . nt
Aristus
(66,531 posts)4. Wait a minute: impeachment IS an indictment!
You impeach, then you try the case.
bdamomma
(63,978 posts)5. well we got it in our Constitution
IMPEACHMENT, let's use it. No excuses. Not for these criminals or this POS who calls himself pResident.
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,089 posts)8. Feels like it might be the tipping point & I'm wondering if I should advocate for
... impeachment soon rather than later.
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,089 posts)6. Yes, it is only legal indictment of sitting president (now). Remove him / de-elect then charge court
RepubliCON DoJ policy is no indictment of sitting Presidents. It's policy, not settled law, but it is as good as law for the duration of the Mango Turd Reich.
Kid Berwyn
(15,097 posts)9. That's what I got, too.
Trump is guilty of obstruction of justice. Its up to Congress. And preserve the evidence before the crook and his goons can destroy it.