Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TNNurse

(6,931 posts)
Sun Jan 5, 2020, 01:21 PM Jan 2020

I am no military historian.

So please help me. Has assassinating a military leader ever stopped a war????

Does Trump think he has dropped nukes on a foreign country and they will surrender to him??

Dear God, how many people have to die (from any country) to feed his ego????

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I am no military historian. (Original Post) TNNurse Jan 2020 OP
What scares me, he makes these decisions seemingly in the dewsgirl Jan 2020 #1
Assassinating military leaders doesn't make their country's actions change. The Velveteen Ocelot Jan 2020 #2
It likely will change things -- for the worse. unblock Jan 2020 #4
He certainly didn't heed Vizzini's advice. BuffaloJackalope Jan 2020 #3
Never trust a Sicilian? unblock Jan 2020 #5

dewsgirl

(14,961 posts)
1. What scares me, he makes these decisions seemingly in the
Sun Jan 5, 2020, 01:28 PM
Jan 2020

moment, with very little to no input from the Pentagon, consequences be damned. Then we have his base, especially the evangelicals cheering him on, praying it goes wrong so they get their rapture.😳🙄

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,922 posts)
2. Assassinating military leaders doesn't make their country's actions change.
Sun Jan 5, 2020, 01:31 PM
Jan 2020

Suleimani was a bad guy but I'm sure Iran has plenty of other bad guys to go around, and they will keep on carrying out the policies of Iran's government and its military operations. This is nothing like killing OBL, who was already in hiding and whose removal was intended as a signal to al-Qaeda, which was already fragmented, that they and their movement would never be safe. Taking out the leader of a non-state organization like al-Qaeda can be useful; taking out one military leader in a country with a very large, well-organized military structure will do nothing to change that country's policies.

unblock

(52,399 posts)
4. It likely will change things -- for the worse.
Sun Jan 5, 2020, 02:13 PM
Jan 2020

It makes the road to peace much more difficult.

Which is probably part of Bolton's objectives, at least.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I am no military historia...