General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsKentucky Republicans push restrictive voting law after landmark Democratic win
New bureaucratic hurdle where voters must carry ID with a photo likely to affect minorities and students.
Last month, Kentucky elected Democratic governor Andy Beshear in a closely watch election a landmark blue win in a mostly conservative state. One of the core promises of his campaign was to restore voting rights to 140,000 people with felony convictions, which he fulfilled immediately after taking office.
Weeks after Beshear issued his historic executive order, however, Kentucky Republicans have proposed a restrictive new bureaucratic hurdle that will likely make it more difficult for minorities and students in the state to vote.
-snip-
Kentucky already requires voter ID at the polls, but the new policy would take this a step further to require a photo and an expiration date. Minorities, who are less likely to possess an acceptable form of ID, and students, are particularly likely to be affected. The University of Kentucky and the University of Louisville, two of the biggest schools in the state, do not currently have expiration dates on their student IDs. This is a tactic that has been used in several other states, often to curb the vote of young and transient populations more likely to vote for Democrats.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/jan/10/kentucky-republicans-voter-fraud
------------------------------------------------------------------
I think the new GOTV campaign needs to include "Get your Photo ID".
spanone
(135,907 posts)Iliyah
(25,111 posts)The only way Republicans can win is to steal and cheat.
mindem
(1,580 posts)don't forget the lying part.
NewJeffCT
(56,829 posts)and, they'll keep trying it until Democrats start doing the same - maybe consolidate voting areas in rural towns so Pa and Ma Deplorable have to drive farther to vote and stand in line for a long time...
calimary
(81,549 posts)They CHEAT. They cant win unless they cheat.
They cant win unless they cheat.
They cannot win unless they cheat.
bronxiteforever
(9,287 posts)SunSeeker
(51,760 posts)Their goal is something akin to the old Apartheid system of South Africa, where the majority (people of color) are excluded from the political process.
usaf-vet
(6,227 posts)Easy to carry in a wallet. I use it as a second form of ID that I carry in my pocket when I am not driving and carrying my DL.
The fact that state schools DO NOT add photo and expiration date seems to be a republican idea. I live in a republican controlled state and have a state-issued Conceal Carry Permit which does NOT have a photo on it. I have always thought that this was a planned move to leave the photo off so that it could not be used as proof of ID for voting.
Voter suppression any way you can facilitate it is a GOP plan.
UCmeNdc
(9,601 posts)The main problem for a passport is the cost and length of time to get one.
Thekaspervote
(32,813 posts)PoindexterOglethorpe
(25,918 posts)work, but getting it, or a passport itself, is a bit of a hassle. However students ought to be able to handle that. Poor people, especially minorities, would find the cost ($65 for the first one, good for ten years, renewal currently $30) prohibitive.
usaf-vet
(6,227 posts)Wisconsin doesn't say the card is FREE upfront. If you call them on it they will admit it. At least that is the way the program ran in the beginning.
Of course, if they really wanted to just make sure you are who you say you are why not issue secured tamper-proof federal Social Security cards with your photo and fingerprint. I know it would be an expensive tantamount task but if the goal is to secure your identity it would be worth the time and expenses.
But I believe the goal is voter suppression and the more disjointed they can keep it state to state the better chance they can suppress access to voting. Just look at what happens if you move to another state for school or a job. A whole new set of hoops to jump thru to get a Voter ID.
IT'S PLANNED THAT WAY. OR as we say in the computer software world. It is not a bug it is a feature.
PoindexterOglethorpe
(25,918 posts)But it is a lot of money for someone struggling and who decides every day whether to eat or pay rent or buy medicine or shoes for the kids.
usaf-vet
(6,227 posts)Suppressed voters NEVER get to decide who will represent THEM. That's the way the GOP wants it. The GOP will decide who will vote them into office. And the circus goes around and around.
machoneman
(4,016 posts)Do the R-scums have enough votes to overcome said veto? Would like to know...............
Lexblues
(180 posts)But the governor, I believe, can wait to veto bills until the end of the legislative session and virtually make it impossible for legislators to have time to override them.
Ohiogal
(32,122 posts)The state elections committee should provide ample aid to help its poorer citizens with this added burden.
Yeah, I know, like thats going to happen ....
Traildogbob
(8,856 posts)All the chanting by Middle Eastern countries should not alarm us. Death is heading at us like a run away freight train, not because of them, but because of us. A Putin is driving. We allow the criminal corruption while playing nice and they beat us like tRumpers beat their wives dogs and kids. God be blessin us.
geretogo
(1,281 posts)makes me sick . We are going the way of Rome in its last years .
Cosmocat
(14,576 posts)All their high and might bloviating about FREEDOM, THE CONSTITUTION, FOUNDING FATHERS, etc and there is NOTHING more fundamental to it all than voting, and the most of the country has no problem with all the shit they pull like this, gerrymandering, how $$$ pours into our elections, etc.
This romantic notion we have of this country does not square very well with the reality of it, and what the people here enable.
mac56
(17,575 posts)RT Atlanta
(2,517 posts)Hmmm....
That 'party' really is focused only on retaining their positions of power and not representing the broader body politic. Just old wealthier white guys and mostly white hicks that have been (surprisingly) convinced through a combination of 'religion,' xenophobia, racism, etc. to vote against their own personal interests.
gratuitous
(82,849 posts)So glad the Roberts court decided that pre-screening these things was no longer required since the U.S. is all totally not-racist now.
KPN
(15,668 posts)transparently obvious and oppressive than that. I hope the two State universities take the fuckers to court if this passes.
LiberalLovinLug
(14,178 posts)...two of the biggest schools in the state, do not currently have expiration dates on their student IDs"
Why couldn't those universities simply stamp an expiration date on ID cards, even if specifically for the upcoming election?
Initech
(100,114 posts)Hermit-The-Prog
(33,509 posts)Historic NY
(37,457 posts)smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)I really, really hate them.
diva77
(7,671 posts)more from OP's article:
Its a solution in search of a problem. Theres no issue in Kentucky elections with in-person impersonation, said Joshua Douglas, a law professor at the University of Kentucky who served on Adams transition team. He added that Kentucky already has some of the most restrictive voting laws in the country a 30-day cutoff for voter registration and no early voting period.
-------------------
When is the media gonna expose these CROOKED elections officials????? THIS IS ELECTION MALPRACTICE!!!!!!! The voters have done NOTHING wrong to justify this measure.
K&R for exposure
mysteryowl
(7,405 posts)If the republicans want picture ID, then it needs to free and accessible to EVERYONE, after-all, we are a democracy.
diva77
(7,671 posts)McTurd ended up --
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/25/us/mitch-mcconnell-election-security-bill-.html
Democratic Kentucky Voters, if you're listening...GOTV!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
UCmeNdc
(9,601 posts)One that no republican can deny you the right to vote?