General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsGeorge Conway & Neal Katyal: Have two impeachment trials - 2nd article first, 1st article next.
Kyle Griffin@kylegriffin1, 4 minutes
George Conway and Neal Katyal argue: "Holding the first article back, and letting the second go forward, would be a powerful and precise response to McConnell ... Trump would be forced to undergo two impeachment trials instead of one."
Link to tweet
----
I like their thinking...but turtle mcConnell will never go for that.
Pantagruel
(2,580 posts)and subpoena documents on a third charge, obstruction as defined by the Mueller report.
spooky3
(34,501 posts)NewJeffCT
(56,829 posts)and, then a 4th if the tax returns/financial docs come out as well and show tax/financial fraud
Kurt V.
(5,624 posts)also fuck him
Pantagruel
(2,580 posts)Don't think he has a choice. It's Pelosi's prerogative what to send over I do believe.
iluvtennis
(19,883 posts)Talitha
(6,626 posts)Qutzupalotl
(14,337 posts)It leaves the first charge open to the addition of new information for a Senate trial at a later date, and as they said, highlights the obstruction. These events happened in the House in plain view of everyone, not on a phone call in Kyiv with only a few witnesses. It *should* be hard to vote to acquit on this, given the Senate is being obstructed too. Maybe they like punishment. Or maybe a secret ballot will rid us of this lawless tyrant once and for all.
lastlib
(23,336 posts)Article I, Sec. 5. One-fifth of the Senate can override secrecy and have the vote recorded. No way the losing side won't want it recorded.
Qutzupalotl
(14,337 posts)Last edited Sat Jan 11, 2020, 11:49 AM - Edit history (1)
assuming there are witnesses.
Republicans will never admit it publicly, but in private they grumble about Trumps behavior and would be fine with dumping him for Pence provided they suffer no negative consequences in the process.
If McConnell sees his majority in jeopardy due to Trump, hed cut him loose in a heartbeat. He could, for instance, make the vote secret on a temporary basis or only revealed if there is a conviction, and pressure his members to go along. Im not saying thats likely, Im saying never say never in politics.
lastlib
(23,336 posts)If twenty Senators want the vote recorded, it will be recorded. I don't see a Constitutional exception for impeachment. Not really any wiggle room on it.
Qutzupalotl
(14,337 posts)Last edited Sat Jan 11, 2020, 02:08 PM - Edit history (1)
who want to thwart removal by insisting on a recorded vote.
lastlib
(23,336 posts)I can't imagine them seeing anything in a trial that WOULD horrify them......
mnmoderatedem
(3,732 posts)wifey no likey
lastlib
(23,336 posts)Woman says to Sir Winston, "If you were my husband, I'd poison your drink." Churchill says, "Madam, if I was your husband, I'd drink it."
lame54
(35,331 posts)Dismiss a single article
Which would diminish the sending of the second article