General Discussion

sprinkleeninow

(20,268 posts) Fri Jan 17, 2020, 01:52 AM Jan 2020

roody joolany put out a statement that he's dumpty's

personal lawyer and not his as president of the united states
🤔

13 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

roody joolany put out a statement that he's dumpty's (Original Post) sprinkleeninow Jan 2020 OP

Is there a fuck-wit outside of MAGA-land who was confused about this before RockRaven Jan 2020 #1

roody speaketh with fork-ed tongue sprinkleeninow Jan 2020 #4

But what does this lunatic think he is accomplishing with this "clarification"? RockRaven Jan 2020 #5

A scary A-dubble-S hat. sprinkleeninow Jan 2020 #7

Its the Merlot talking. marble falls Jan 2020 #8

butts headed for slings (figuratively speaking, naturellement) sprinkleeninow Jan 2020 #13

Yeah, that's a whole fooking part of the impeachment, skeever, the MerryBlooms Jan 2020 #2

Was flashed on PBS Newshour a little bit ago. sprinkleeninow Jan 2020 #6

I don't have cable tv, so I have to wait until MerryBlooms Jan 2020 #10

We only subscribe to basic. I don't need 250 channels! sprinkleeninow Jan 2020 #12

Does this mean no executive privilege for any info Roody has? fierywoman Jan 2020 #3

Maybe he's signaling he's ready to plea bargain? marble falls Jan 2020 #9

I can't even remember--was he already subpoenaed and refused to cooperate? sprinkleeninow Jan 2020 #11

RockRaven

(15,040 posts)

1. Is there a fuck-wit outside of MAGA-land who was confused about this before

Reply to sprinkleeninow (Original post)

Fri Jan 17, 2020, 01:58 AM

Jan 2020

this statement?

sprinkleeninow

(20,268 posts)

4. roody speaketh with fork-ed tongue

Reply to RockRaven (Reply #1)

Fri Jan 17, 2020, 02:04 AM

Jan 2020

RockRaven

(15,040 posts)

5. But what does this lunatic think he is accomplishing with this "clarification"?

Reply to sprinkleeninow (Reply #4)

Fri Jan 17, 2020, 02:09 AM

Jan 2020

Anyone who would be moved by believing him doesn't need to hear this because of their priors. But anyone who would need to hear this to be moved would not believe him because of their priors.

sprinkleeninow

(20,268 posts)

7. A scary A-dubble-S hat.

Reply to RockRaven (Reply #5)

Fri Jan 17, 2020, 02:15 AM

Jan 2020

he frettin'....

marble falls

(57,394 posts)

8. Its the Merlot talking.

Reply to RockRaven (Reply #5)

Fri Jan 17, 2020, 02:15 AM

Jan 2020

sprinkleeninow

(20,268 posts)

13. butts headed for slings (figuratively speaking, naturellement)

Reply to marble falls (Reply #8)

Fri Jan 17, 2020, 02:24 AM

Jan 2020

MerryBlooms

(11,773 posts)

2. Yeah, that's a whole fooking part of the impeachment, skeever, the

Reply to sprinkleeninow (Original post)

Fri Jan 17, 2020, 02:02 AM

Jan 2020

president working for his own interest instead of our country. Cripes, how the hell did this guy ever prosecute a case? Is he on drugs like trump, or what? wtfork?

sprinkleeninow

(20,268 posts)

6. Was flashed on PBS Newshour a little bit ago.

Reply to MerryBlooms (Reply #2)

Fri Jan 17, 2020, 02:10 AM

Jan 2020

Wasted some of my sight reading that.
Then it went to my head for processing.
My poor noggin felt like a rupture coming on. 🤕

MerryBlooms

(11,773 posts)

10. I don't have cable tv, so I have to wait until

Reply to sprinkleeninow (Reply #6)

Fri Jan 17, 2020, 02:18 AM

Jan 2020

the segments show up on the internet. I'm missing some of tonight's Rachel interview, and will have to wait on the following shows. The last couple of days have been surreal!