Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsImpeachment managers release trial memorandum detailing why Trump must be removed from office
House impeachment managers released an in-depth trial memorandum laying out the case for convicting President Donald Trump during his Senate impeachment trial.
The memorandum was released by representatives Adam Schiff (D-CA), Jerry Nadler (D-NY), Zoe Lofgren (D-CA), Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY), Val Demings (D-FL), Jason Crow (D-CO) and Sylvia Garcia (D-FL).
The document divides the argument by the House of Representatives into three points.
The Senate should convict President Trump of abuse of power, is the first section.
Read the full document (PDF).
https://www.rawstory.com/2020/01/impeachment-managers-release-trial-memorandum-detailing-why-trump-must-be-removed-from-office/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 693 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (17)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Impeachment managers release trial memorandum detailing why Trump must be removed from office (Original Post)
Miles Archer
Jan 2020
OP
They should of charged him with bribery/extortion. I think that was a mistake. nt
UniteFightBack
Jan 2020
#2
Yes, I was disappointed not to see a discussion of Trump's bribery in that brief. nt
SunSeeker
Jan 2020
#3
can they add additional charges if more new information is found to impeach him??
trueblue2007
Jan 2020
#6
all fact based and logical arguments...too bad you are dealing corrupt ideologues
Thomas Hurt
Jan 2020
#4
SunSeeker
(51,771 posts)1. K & R
UniteFightBack
(8,231 posts)2. They should of charged him with bribery/extortion. I think that was a mistake. nt
SunSeeker
(51,771 posts)3. Yes, I was disappointed not to see a discussion of Trump's bribery in that brief. nt
trueblue2007
(17,243 posts)6. can they add additional charges if more new information is found to impeach him??
Thomas Hurt
(13,903 posts)4. all fact based and logical arguments...too bad you are dealing corrupt ideologues
Hermit-The-Prog
(33,510 posts)5. Thanks for the document link! I missed this.