Heather Cox Richardson - January 18, 2020 - Letters From An American
https://heathercoxrichardson.substack.com
"SNIP......
Trump answered. His lawyers, Jay Sekulow and Pat Cipollone, slightly cleaned up the same hysterical defenses Trump has been making since the Ukraine Scandal first broke. In just 5 and a half pages, with no footnotes or evidence, Trump argues that the Democrats are attacking the right of the American people to freely choose their President. He claims impeachment is a brazen and unlawful attempt to overturn the results of the 2016 election and interfere with the 2020 election. He calls the articles of impeachment constitutionally invalid on their face, an affront to the Constitution of the United States, our democratic institutions, and the American people. The president, he says, did absolutely nothing wrong.
So there it is. On the one hand, we have a reasoned argument, based in fact, that can be challenged as we try to get to a shared agreement on what happened. On the other hand, we have our president telling us to accept what he says as true, despite the fact that he has provided no factual evidence and, indeed, much of what he has said is demonstrably false.
.......
Until the rise of talk radio in 1987 and the establishment of the Fox News Channel in 1996, we honored the Enlightenment values on which our government was founded: politicians had to attract voters with fact-based arguments or be voted out of office. But talk radio and FNC pushed a fictional narrative that captivated viewers who felt dispossessed after 1954, as women and people of color began to approach having an equal voice in society. That narrativeof a heroic white man under siege by a government that wants to give his hard-earned money to black and brown people and grasping womenhas led us back to where we started in 1776: a conflict between democracy and authoritarianism.
Today, the House managers laid out a fact-based argument that honors our heritage. In contrast, Trumps statement rejects not only facts but also the need to make a fact-based argument. He rejects the need to be accountable to the American people. He rejects the idea that no one is above the law. He evidently does not believe in American democracy: the great American experiment that says human beings can govern themselves.
......SNIP"