General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSupreme Court Will Not Rule Quickly on Obamacare Appeal
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/21/us/supreme-court-obamacare.htmlSupreme Court Will Not Rule Quickly on Obamacare Appeal
Democrats and the House of Representatives had urged the court to act in time to decide their appeals by the end of the courts term in June.
By Adam Liptak
Jan. 21, 2020
WASHINGTON The Supreme Court on Monday rejected a request from Democratic state officials and the House of Representatives to quickly consider an appeal of a decision with the potential to wipe out the entire Affordable Care Act. The move means the court will almost certainly not hear the case in its current term, which ends in June.
Democrats consider health care a winning issue, and wanted the court to act quickly in order to keep the fate of the Affordable Care Act in the public eye during the presidential election. In the meantime, the law remains almost entirely intact but faces an uncertain future.
The case was originally brought by Republican state officials, who argued that changes to the Affordable Care Act made by Congress in 2017 rendered the laws requirement that most Americans obtain health insurance unconstitutional. The Trump administration sided with the state officials, arguing that the rest of the health care law could not survive without the requirement, sometimes called the individual mandate.
A Federal District Court judge in Texas agreed, ruling that the entire law was invalid, but he postponed the effects of his ruling until the case could be appealed. In December, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, in New Orleans, agreed that the mandate was unconstitutional but declined to rule on the fate of the remainder of the health law, asking the lower court to reconsider the question in more detail.
Bettie
(16,132 posts)that it won't be decided before the election?
kozar
(2,138 posts)And wondering if this is same case that was mentioned a few weeks ago when someone from WH asked SC to slow walk a certain decision until after elections?
Koz
Bettie
(16,132 posts)if the SCOTUS declares the entire ACA unconstitutional, our healthcare system goes into chaos overnight.
I'm sure that would be inconvenient for Impeached Orange to have happen in June and I have zero faith in the SCOTUS we have now.
dalton99a
(81,637 posts)https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2020/1/21/21075160/supreme-court-obamacare-texas-california-expedite
gratuitous
(82,849 posts)I'm guessing that the Court isn't doing Democrats a favor by holding off a ruling until after the election, which leads me to suspect that they're going to affirm the Texas judge's hare-brained opinion and decision. If the Supreme Court issued its ruling in June or so, Democrats could use it as an election issue. By waiting until after the election, this is one less tool available to Democrats to increase turnout (not that Democrats shouldn't have a plethora of issues at hand to rally support). If the Court was inclined to overrule the lower courts and keep the Affordable Care Act intact, it would leave the Republicans squawking about how tyrannical it is for Americans to be covered for pre-existing conditions or for women to expect to have access to the full range of health care available to them.
dem4decades
(11,307 posts)EleanorR
(2,395 posts)John Roberts sided with trump.
VMA131Marine
(4,158 posts)Kagan, Ginsburg, Sotomayor, and Breyer could have had the full court hear the case now if they wanted to.