Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

dalton99a

(81,637 posts)
Tue Jan 21, 2020, 12:46 PM Jan 2020

Supreme Court Will Not Rule Quickly on Obamacare Appeal

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/21/us/supreme-court-obamacare.html

Supreme Court Will Not Rule Quickly on Obamacare Appeal
Democrats and the House of Representatives had urged the court to act in time to decide their appeals by the end of the court’s term in June.
By Adam Liptak
Jan. 21, 2020

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Monday rejected a request from Democratic state officials and the House of Representatives to quickly consider an appeal of a decision with the potential to wipe out the entire Affordable Care Act. The move means the court will almost certainly not hear the case in its current term, which ends in June.

Democrats consider health care a winning issue, and wanted the court to act quickly in order to keep the fate of the Affordable Care Act in the public eye during the presidential election. In the meantime, the law remains almost entirely intact but faces an uncertain future.

The case was originally brought by Republican state officials, who argued that changes to the Affordable Care Act made by Congress in 2017 rendered the law’s requirement that most Americans obtain health insurance unconstitutional. The Trump administration sided with the state officials, arguing that the rest of the health care law could not survive without the requirement, sometimes called the individual mandate.

A Federal District Court judge in Texas agreed, ruling that the entire law was invalid, but he postponed the effects of his ruling until the case could be appealed. In December, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, in New Orleans, agreed that the mandate was unconstitutional but declined to rule on the fate of the remainder of the health law, asking the lower court to reconsider the question in more detail.


8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Supreme Court Will Not Rule Quickly on Obamacare Appeal (Original Post) dalton99a Jan 2020 OP
So, what does this ultimately mean Bettie Jan 2020 #1
That's how I am reading it Bettie, kozar Jan 2020 #2
Pretty sure it is Bettie Jan 2020 #6
It is good news for Republicans. dalton99a Jan 2020 #4
It neuters the health care as an election issue gratuitous Jan 2020 #5
Sure kill it after the election so voters won't see it coming. Dumb voters anyway. dem4decades Jan 2020 #3
The trump cabal requested that it be slow-walked, and they complied EleanorR Jan 2020 #7
It only takes 4 justices to grant certiorari VMA131Marine Jan 2020 #8

kozar

(2,138 posts)
2. That's how I am reading it Bettie,
Tue Jan 21, 2020, 12:58 PM
Jan 2020

And wondering if this is same case that was mentioned a few weeks ago when someone from WH asked SC to slow walk a certain decision until after elections?


Koz

Bettie

(16,132 posts)
6. Pretty sure it is
Tue Jan 21, 2020, 01:02 PM
Jan 2020

if the SCOTUS declares the entire ACA unconstitutional, our healthcare system goes into chaos overnight.

I'm sure that would be inconvenient for Impeached Orange to have happen in June and I have zero faith in the SCOTUS we have now.

dalton99a

(81,637 posts)
4. It is good news for Republicans.
Tue Jan 21, 2020, 01:00 PM
Jan 2020
In practical terms, that’s a double victory for Republicans: It leaves open the possibility that Obamacare will be killed by a judicial decree, but spares Republican candidates from the media spotlight that would come from a high-profile Supreme Court fight involving a challenge to the Affordable Care Act.

https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2020/1/21/21075160/supreme-court-obamacare-texas-california-expedite

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
5. It neuters the health care as an election issue
Tue Jan 21, 2020, 01:01 PM
Jan 2020

I'm guessing that the Court isn't doing Democrats a favor by holding off a ruling until after the election, which leads me to suspect that they're going to affirm the Texas judge's hare-brained opinion and decision. If the Supreme Court issued its ruling in June or so, Democrats could use it as an election issue. By waiting until after the election, this is one less tool available to Democrats to increase turnout (not that Democrats shouldn't have a plethora of issues at hand to rally support). If the Court was inclined to overrule the lower courts and keep the Affordable Care Act intact, it would leave the Republicans squawking about how tyrannical it is for Americans to be covered for pre-existing conditions or for women to expect to have access to the full range of health care available to them.

VMA131Marine

(4,158 posts)
8. It only takes 4 justices to grant certiorari
Tue Jan 21, 2020, 02:30 PM
Jan 2020

Kagan, Ginsburg, Sotomayor, and Breyer could have had the full court hear the case now if they wanted to.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Supreme Court Will Not Ru...