Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
127 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
****LIVE IMPEACHMENT TRIAL THREAD 1**** (Original Post) BumRushDaShow Jan 2020 OP
They are in session BumRushDaShow Jan 2020 #1
I dislike my Senator Inhofe with a vengence. redstatebluegirl Jan 2020 #43
Well the Chief Justice publicly had Inhofe sworn in today BumRushDaShow Jan 2020 #53
You might like this story TlalocW Jan 2020 #113
I love it! Great story. redstatebluegirl Jan 2020 #119
My favorite is TlalocW Jan 2020 #125
TY!!! bluestarone Jan 2020 #2
Will try to contribute as much as I have time for BumRushDaShow Jan 2020 #4
Soon come malaise Jan 2020 #3
Careful! Make sure it's not a Russian spy. tanyev Jan 2020 #8
Giggle/Smirk magicarpet Jan 2020 #126
Not a plumber 👷‍♀️🛁🔧 from the Watergate era... sprinkleeninow Jan 2020 #116
I knew a DUer woudl raise this malaise Jan 2020 #117
I heard tell y'all had some water issues. sprinkleeninow Jan 2020 #123
Hope it's all OK now malaise Jan 2020 #124
The clerk read the Rules motion BumRushDaShow Jan 2020 #5
UGH - Cipollone's first time up - opening statement to debate the Rules motion BumRushDaShow Jan 2020 #6
I think he's about to wet himself. Gidney N Cloyd Jan 2020 #9
Is anone else having trouble sitting still watching this? I can feel my BP rising hlthe2b Jan 2020 #7
Yes. Probably everyone watching. But watch it we must for democracy and the children, as Pelosi says ancianita Jan 2020 #17
Yep. I'm listening on satellite radio and already I'm trying to make Mike 03 Jan 2020 #19
Oh, heavens... If I start "stress-eating" heaven knows where this will end. hlthe2b Jan 2020 #30
Stress-eating you say? beveeheart Jan 2020 #99
IMO the reason it's different is that we're witnessing in real time the destruction of Mike 03 Jan 2020 #24
I just straight up can't Stryst Jan 2020 #114
No cable so no CSPAN but I watched the opening on Hartmann yellowdogintexas Jan 2020 #120
Cipillone is ...not very um, how shall I put it? blogslut Jan 2020 #10
His reasoning was like "I liked the movie because... it was good." Gidney N Cloyd Jan 2020 #14
Exactly. "We've to accept this resolution cuz Nancy made us wait too long waaaaaaa!" ancianita Jan 2020 #21
*WNNER!!! elleng Jan 2020 #22
He's playing to his audience. His real audience. AtheistCrusader Jan 2020 #118
He's not impressive that's for sure. n/t Control-Z Jan 2020 #16
Not impressive Walleye Jan 2020 #18
Yes, along with 'I love torture' Derschowitz. MoonRiver Jan 2020 #51
Cipollone sounds like a grade schooler making a case C_U_L8R Jan 2020 #11
Cippy cup done. Schiff up for his opening statement for debate of Rules resolution. BumRushDaShow Jan 2020 #12
Boy Cipillone is nervous as a cat. Not a good look so far. nolabear Jan 2020 #13
He's used to lying but not in front of so many experts. Gidney N Cloyd Jan 2020 #20
"Experts" at What? Law or Lying? The_Counsel Jan 2020 #37
Lying, of course. What's law got to do with anything? Gidney N Cloyd Jan 2020 #40
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL The_Counsel Jan 2020 #60
Cats might get nervous but then they prevail, not Cippy Cup he looks like a teenage boy ChubbyStar Jan 2020 #25
Bullshit. Trumps atty: "This is modeled on the Clinton trial" - not even close. nt AnotherMother4Peace Jan 2020 #15
Yes. My blood pressure goes up, too. BlueDawn Jan 2020 #23
Listening. elleng Jan 2020 #33
He was like that doing the House hearings. . . Iliyah Jan 2020 #26
Does Adam sound a little out of breath? He's getting warmed up now but at first he had dem4decades Jan 2020 #27
Schiff! Killing it! What a fair trial is, what you senators' important job is, how we best proceed. ancianita Jan 2020 #28
You really think deplorables are following? Too fast, too Laura PourMeADrink Jan 2020 #61
I think they are. Way more are who are not deplorables. Those voters outnumber deplorables. ancianita Jan 2020 #65
Let's hope so. Laura PourMeADrink Jan 2020 #107
Schiff is excellent and doing a fantastic job! BumRushDaShow Jan 2020 #29
Adam Schiff rocks. gademocrat7 Jan 2020 #31
Yep . . . Iliyah Jan 2020 #36
Change to McConnell resolution: 3 days/24 hours instead of 2 blogslut Jan 2020 #32
That's huge scheming daemons Jan 2020 #34
Yeah but that concession was way too easy PRETZEL Jan 2020 #44
Schiff is amazing. He never has an off day. I've never heard him less than 100%. Mike 03 Jan 2020 #35
what a contrast -- McConnell and Schiff! Hermit-The-Prog Jan 2020 #38
Totally. Just in presenting what a fair trial has looked like and could look like. ancianita Jan 2020 #46
His arguments are spot on. Just wish he had Laura PourMeADrink Jan 2020 #41
Engaging and compelling. Gidney N Cloyd Jan 2020 #45
Another Big Concession blogslut Jan 2020 #39
Aside from witnesses, this is the concession PRETZEL Jan 2020 #47
Do all the Senators know? blaze Jan 2020 #54
Schiff is electric Richard D Jan 2020 #42
Schiff is a paragon of democratic reason. ancianita Jan 2020 #48
All the Trump republicans disagree with him. SamKnause Jan 2020 #50
Wonder if our Managers will hammer away at NoMoreRepugs Jan 2020 #49
Why not. It will be a good reminder to the Chief Justice about his legacy as much as to senators. ancianita Jan 2020 #52
Schiff is devastating. C_U_L8R Jan 2020 #55
Adam is doing an excellent job. SamKnause Jan 2020 #56
I appreciate Schiff. Mersky Jan 2020 #57
I wish we could see Roberts as Schiff speaks!!! getagrip_already Jan 2020 #58
C-SPAN elleng Jan 2020 #62
Everyone is using the c-span camera..... getagrip_already Jan 2020 #63
Isn't the c-span camera ALWAYS focused on the podium? elleng Jan 2020 #64
possibly, but I'd still like to see more.. friggin senate.. ;) getagrip_already Jan 2020 #80
Good luck rebutting this. Hehehe. Glimmer of Hope Jan 2020 #59
I've been hanging onto every word by Schiff Hermit-The-Prog Jan 2020 #68
So Roberts is OK with overseeing a trial were important evidence and witnesses are restricted?!?! uponit7771 Jan 2020 #66
It's his Constitutional duty elleng Jan 2020 #70
+1 !!! He can demand relevant evidence etc and make Moscow Mitch overrule him. We'll see but uponit7771 Jan 2020 #83
I think everyone should read this. Dyedinthewoolliberal Jan 2020 #97
If Roberts were interested in not having a sham trial then he'd put the senates vote to account no.. uponit7771 Jan 2020 #106
Ladies and Gentlemen, Adam Motherfucking Schiff. nolabear Jan 2020 #67
Schiff is done and here comes Sekulo for his debut. BumRushDaShow Jan 2020 #69
Cheap reactions to Schiff. NO correct characterization of House hearings AT ALL. ancianita Jan 2020 #72
This is SO stinking predictable. Nothing re the actual issue. nolabear Jan 2020 #78
I think we knew that they would be flying by the seat of their pants BumRushDaShow Jan 2020 #79
This is standard Gym Jordany word salad bullshit. The Senate will be ho hum about this. ancianita Jan 2020 #98
Lying right off the bat, in all his TV atty persona - sickening. nt AnotherMother4Peace Jan 2020 #82
Heeeeeeeeeeeere's Jay! NT mahatmakanejeeves Jan 2020 #71
Does his voice always sound like he's whining and about Bettie Jan 2020 #74
Back to the lying. Zoonart Jan 2020 #76
Fucking Jay Sekelow is a fucking co-conspirator in this shit. Tommy_Carcetti Jan 2020 #73
+1, uponit7771 Jan 2020 #88
Rebuttal Mossfern Jan 2020 #75
And Sekulow plays the same old broken tune blogslut Jan 2020 #77
Sekulow is totally choking C_U_L8R Jan 2020 #81
Why are you there, Jay? C_U_L8R Jan 2020 #84
Because Trump doesn't pay his bills . . NellieStarbuck Jan 2020 #109
Well, let's just hope better Jan 2020 #112
That fucker Sekulow should be fined for lying. SamKnause Jan 2020 #85
Excuse me while I get some Valerian supplements. nt Mike 03 Jan 2020 #86
So this guy is going over hack talking points and not refuting Schiff !?!? Senate is hack forum uponit7771 Jan 2020 #87
He is a hack and his oratory is unworthy of being heard by Justice Roberts. Mike 03 Jan 2020 #93
Four points Schiff laid out comparing the Clinton impeachment trial to the current Trump Impeachment Mersky Jan 2020 #89
Sekulow seems like a lawyer who's just good enough to know he's got nothin'. Gidney N Cloyd Jan 2020 #90
Well done Mr. Schiff LibfromtheNorth Jan 2020 #91
You use "SUCK" like it's the ultimate insult. not_the_one Jan 2020 #122
****LIVE IMPEACHMENT TRIAL THREAD 2**** UP BumRushDaShow Jan 2020 #92
Thank you for doing this, BumRushDaShow! ancianita Jan 2020 #103
Thank you, BumRush! Mersky Jan 2020 #111
Previously into ambulance chasing ads, sekulow is now Mersky Jan 2020 #94
I'm not watching sham trial when one knows the result, already. demosincebirth Jan 2020 #95
Wow. All the President's Lawyers are just gonna lie. blogslut Jan 2020 #96
Utter bullshit budkin Jan 2020 #100
They are playing to the ignorant public. Lying their asses off. nolabear Jan 2020 #101
These fuckers need to be fined for intentionally lying. SamKnause Jan 2020 #102
+ agree. iluvtennis Jan 2020 #108
Recommended. H2O Man Jan 2020 #104
Adan Schiff is a very skilled prosecutor. gademocrat7 Jan 2020 #105
Well PatSeg Jan 2020 #115
One of the traitor lawyers Liberalhammer Jan 2020 #110
Process process, process LittleGirl Jan 2020 #121
ZOOM,.. Zoom,.. zoom,... magicarpet Jan 2020 #127

BumRushDaShow

(129,715 posts)
1. They are in session
Tue Jan 21, 2020, 02:24 PM
Jan 2020

Inhofe was sworn in by Roberts (Inhofe was absent last week).

Clerk is reading the Rules..

redstatebluegirl

(12,265 posts)
43. I dislike my Senator Inhofe with a vengence.
Tue Jan 21, 2020, 02:47 PM
Jan 2020

I do think it is important to indicate here that the reason he was not in the session last week was because his wife had a stroke. He was back in Tulsa with her.

Not fond of the man but he had a good reason for not being present. I figured someone would make a comment about his absence.

BumRushDaShow

(129,715 posts)
53. Well the Chief Justice publicly had Inhofe sworn in today
Tue Jan 21, 2020, 02:54 PM
Jan 2020

and sign the Oath Book since he was not there to do so last week (regardless of why he wasn't there).

TlalocW

(15,392 posts)
113. You might like this story
Tue Jan 21, 2020, 04:13 PM
Jan 2020

So in 1996, I was at Oklahoma State doing some grad work, and I was a member of a club (Latin Dancing and Cultural Club) that was going to be marching in the homecoming parade. I remember it was 1996 because all the floats and groups were snaked through a residential area in some sort of pattern waiting for their turn to go, and there was a Young Democrats float so I went over to get a Clinton/Gore sticker. Not a minute later, Jim Inhofe rides by on a horse. I go to the faculty advisor of our club who is taking pictures and tell her, "I'm going to ask Inhofe for a photo, put this sticker on his horse's saddle blanket, and you take it. She was all for it. Unfortunately, there was a kid with the Inhofe campaign standing next to the advisor waiting to give me a Inhofe sticker. So picture was taken, shake hands with Jim, get the sticker from the kid, and I walk around the horse and put the sticker on that side of the blanket. My hope was he would ride through the parade stumping for Clinton. Unfortunately, he rode over to where some marchers for a state republican candidate were, and they found it. And he immediately turned his horse around to come back to our group just as we were given the go-ahead to move out. I would have been easy to pick out - I was the only gringo in the club, and I had a bright orange mustache - but I was hunched down on the side of the truck that was part of our group, giggling and peeking through the windows at him standing up in his saddle, scanning the group for me with a pissed-off look on his face.

It could have ended there.

A few years later, I had decided I really wanted a job and left grad school and moved to Tulsa. A swing club (remember swing making a comeback in the late 90s?) was having a Latin dance weekend so some friends and I went both nights, including the lessons they were giving beforehand. (Sidenote: If your instructor is Hispanic/Latin, salsa was invented in the country of his or her heritage) A woman I didn't know showed up both nights as well. First night she said, "You look very familiar. I can't remember names, but I never forget a face." Second night, "Did you ever put a democratic sticker on a republican horse?" I thought maybe she had gone to OSU and had seen me do it though I thought there wasn't anyone near me. But no. She had just moved from Florida a few weeks ago, and apparently someone in some level of "the press" had taken my picture, and they put it on the wires, and her local paper had put it in their humor/human interest section.

TlalocW

redstatebluegirl

(12,265 posts)
119. I love it! Great story.
Tue Jan 21, 2020, 05:03 PM
Jan 2020

There are lots of crazy Inhofe stories around, a lot of them involve his flying, or inability to land would be a better description. .

TlalocW

(15,392 posts)
125. My favorite is
Tue Jan 21, 2020, 06:01 PM
Jan 2020

The water in front of the lake house he has on Grand Lake once got covered with algae, and he thought it would be safe for swimming. Yeah, I'm going to trust that guy when it comes to science.

TlalocW

sprinkleeninow

(20,268 posts)
123. I heard tell y'all had some water issues.
Tue Jan 21, 2020, 05:55 PM
Jan 2020

A string of outlets shut down last week and a GFCI wouldn't reset. I freaked thinking about an electrician $$. I believe I had already posted my dilemma. I got the GGCI to reset. Then a flood light blew out and then one chandelier bulb, then two days later another.

Cue strange and eerie music. 👻



BumRushDaShow

(129,715 posts)
5. The clerk read the Rules motion
Tue Jan 21, 2020, 02:27 PM
Jan 2020

They are now going to debate the language of the Resolution (equally divided). Dems against, GOP for.

hlthe2b

(102,447 posts)
7. Is anone else having trouble sitting still watching this? I can feel my BP rising
Tue Jan 21, 2020, 02:29 PM
Jan 2020

with my frustration & anger. I've watched lots of Senate testimony, but this is really different for me, at least.

ancianita

(36,161 posts)
17. Yes. Probably everyone watching. But watch it we must for democracy and the children, as Pelosi says
Tue Jan 21, 2020, 02:32 PM
Jan 2020

Mike 03

(16,616 posts)
19. Yep. I'm listening on satellite radio and already I'm trying to make
Tue Jan 21, 2020, 02:33 PM
Jan 2020

myself "have to go to the bathroom" or "get hungry" or anything else.

Mike 03

(16,616 posts)
24. IMO the reason it's different is that we're witnessing in real time the destruction of
Tue Jan 21, 2020, 02:35 PM
Jan 2020

our Constitutional system by an entire political party in cahoots with a corrupt president.

It's the giganticness.

Stryst

(714 posts)
114. I just straight up can't
Tue Jan 21, 2020, 04:23 PM
Jan 2020

My plan is to do a few check ins, but I just can't sit and watch. I have serious worries about breaking a tooth, or my partner putting a nail through their palm.

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
118. He's playing to his audience. His real audience.
Tue Jan 21, 2020, 04:53 PM
Jan 2020

The trump supporters that will nod and agree, because clearly, he said it was good. He wouldn't say it was good if it wasn't.

That's the level of complexity we're dealing with, folks.

ChubbyStar

(3,191 posts)
25. Cats might get nervous but then they prevail, not Cippy Cup he looks like a teenage boy
Tue Jan 21, 2020, 02:36 PM
Jan 2020

Caught wanking off on his mothers wedding dress. Guilty and ashamed.

BlueDawn

(892 posts)
23. Yes. My blood pressure goes up, too.
Tue Jan 21, 2020, 02:35 PM
Jan 2020

I totally get where you're coming from.

I have tried to watch but I just cannot stomach it. My blood pressure definitely rises, and I feel so angry sometimes that I can hardly stand it.

I admire those who can handle it.



Iliyah

(25,111 posts)
26. He was like that doing the House hearings. . .
Tue Jan 21, 2020, 02:38 PM
Jan 2020

Not well versed and lies like the rest of the Republicans.

ancianita

(36,161 posts)
65. I think they are. Way more are who are not deplorables. Those voters outnumber deplorables.
Tue Jan 21, 2020, 03:15 PM
Jan 2020

Deplorables will see repeat videos of these arguments and be able to think about their vote, even if there is an acquittal.

BumRushDaShow

(129,715 posts)
29. Schiff is excellent and doing a fantastic job!
Tue Jan 21, 2020, 02:39 PM
Jan 2020

He has the right amount of gravitas and is conveying the right amount of incredulity for how Turtle and the GOP are handling this matter.

Iliyah

(25,111 posts)
36. Yep . . .
Tue Jan 21, 2020, 02:44 PM
Jan 2020

Unfortunately Republicans are not listening. Republican senators have already made up their minds. Hopefully at least 4 will break.

blogslut

(38,021 posts)
32. Change to McConnell resolution: 3 days/24 hours instead of 2
Tue Jan 21, 2020, 02:40 PM
Jan 2020



Manu Raju
@mkraju

In a significant change that was just made to the McConnell resolution, there are now 3 days of opening arguments over 24 hours. The initial language had just two days. GOP aides confirm they made the change.

PRETZEL

(3,245 posts)
44. Yeah but that concession was way too easy
Tue Jan 21, 2020, 02:48 PM
Jan 2020

that it almost sounds like McConnell put the 2 days in just to make the concession to 3 days look like it was being fair.

ancianita

(36,161 posts)
46. Totally. Just in presenting what a fair trial has looked like and could look like.
Tue Jan 21, 2020, 02:49 PM
Jan 2020

How nothing they've said or done matters TODAY but their oath of impartial justice.

 

Laura PourMeADrink

(42,770 posts)
41. His arguments are spot on. Just wish he had
Tue Jan 21, 2020, 02:47 PM
Jan 2020

more modulation in his voice and would slow down. Not a content thing, a presentation thing. When you have to work at listening....sadly many won't.

blogslut

(38,021 posts)
39. Another Big Concession
Tue Jan 21, 2020, 02:46 PM
Jan 2020



Geoff Bennett
@GeoffRBennett

Another big concession: The Senate, under the revised rules, will now admit the House record into evidence for the impeachment trial.

SamKnause

(13,110 posts)
50. All the Trump republicans disagree with him.
Tue Jan 21, 2020, 02:52 PM
Jan 2020

All the Trump republicans are liars.

They are as proud of their lies, as they are of their willful ignorance.

They wear both as badges of honor.

They sicken me.


They are EVIL !!!

They are the greatest threat this country has ever faced.

NoMoreRepugs

(9,489 posts)
49. Wonder if our Managers will hammer away at
Tue Jan 21, 2020, 02:50 PM
Jan 2020

how our very Democracy is at stake and checks and balances will cease to exist if the Orange Menace is exonerated.

ancianita

(36,161 posts)
52. Why not. It will be a good reminder to the Chief Justice about his legacy as much as to senators.
Tue Jan 21, 2020, 02:53 PM
Jan 2020

They've got 24 hours -- more than enough time, and at prime time, when most Americans watch -- to present all their case and and all the Senate vote consequences they could want to.

Americans need to see what's at stake.

This trial is no time to mince words.

Mersky

(4,986 posts)
57. I appreciate Schiff.
Tue Jan 21, 2020, 02:59 PM
Jan 2020

Will go back and watch all of his remarks from the beginning.

I heard him emphasizing the pressure placed on these opening remarks. Basically, as goes the remarks so goes the ‘trial’.

...
Is a shame that the republicans have carried themselves thus far as unserious and incurious as they undermine the country and Constitution. They must rise to the occasion or tRump & co. will be the end of them as well as their constituents’ future.

getagrip_already

(14,907 posts)
58. I wish we could see Roberts as Schiff speaks!!!
Tue Jan 21, 2020, 03:04 PM
Jan 2020

Or for that matter the senators.

But trump-teevee is tightly focused on schiff. You can't see anyone else. I'm sure that is intentional.

getagrip_already

(14,907 posts)
80. possibly, but I'd still like to see more.. friggin senate.. ;)
Tue Jan 21, 2020, 03:20 PM
Jan 2020

It would tell a lot to see if roberts was paying attention, nodding, or scowling.

uponit7771

(90,367 posts)
66. So Roberts is OK with overseeing a trial were important evidence and witnesses are restricted?!?!
Tue Jan 21, 2020, 03:15 PM
Jan 2020

Yep, cause he's a hack ... straight up hack ... this is not about perjury regarding sex

uponit7771

(90,367 posts)
83. +1 !!! He can demand relevant evidence etc and make Moscow Mitch overrule him. We'll see but
Tue Jan 21, 2020, 03:21 PM
Jan 2020

.. I'm leaning towards hack

Dyedinthewoolliberal

(15,596 posts)
97. I think everyone should read this.
Tue Jan 21, 2020, 03:30 PM
Jan 2020

Mitch has a tremendous amount of power in this process and it's not related to political party. It's part of the process according to this very nice article-https://theconversation.com/impeachment-comes-to-the-senate-5-questions-answered-124632

uponit7771

(90,367 posts)
106. If Roberts were interested in not having a sham trial then he'd put the senates vote to account no..
Tue Jan 21, 2020, 03:41 PM
Jan 2020

... matter how much authority Moscow Mitch has

BumRushDaShow

(129,715 posts)
79. I think we knew that they would be flying by the seat of their pants
Tue Jan 21, 2020, 03:20 PM
Jan 2020

with the clown show in suit-and-tie.

ancianita

(36,161 posts)
98. This is standard Gym Jordany word salad bullshit. The Senate will be ho hum about this.
Tue Jan 21, 2020, 03:31 PM
Jan 2020

Trump "denied" evidence -- executive privilege -- attacks on Schiff, Nadler Pelosi -- whyarewehere!, Dems been going for this since Trump's election -- "insurance," -- I'd like to make reference to SCOTUS
-- I'll criticize the investigations later -- the RUSH to impeachment after we had to wait SO LONG waaa -- executive privilege protects the constitution! -- Dems don't wait for judicial review! -- Dems want to remove Article 3! courts don't apply to them! -- we have the judiciary to make Dems wait! -- we'll preserve the Constitution by arguing this horrible process! -- Dems waited, then rushed impeachment! --

But hey, Word Salad Sekulow is NOT prepared to proceed.

Cipollone re-attacks Schiff, calls him a liar, a "manufacturer of fraudulent version of Trump's call."

Csshifty Cipollone.

Fuck these guys.

Tommy_Carcetti

(43,219 posts)
73. Fucking Jay Sekelow is a fucking co-conspirator in this shit.
Tue Jan 21, 2020, 03:19 PM
Jan 2020

I can't believe he's actually up there as a lawyer.

uponit7771

(90,367 posts)
87. So this guy is going over hack talking points and not refuting Schiff !?!? Senate is hack forum
Tue Jan 21, 2020, 03:24 PM
Jan 2020

... now under Moscow Mitch

Mersky

(4,986 posts)
89. Four points Schiff laid out comparing the Clinton impeachment trial to the current Trump Impeachment
Tue Jan 21, 2020, 03:25 PM
Jan 2020

1. Rules for the the impeachment trial were devised through mutual consent, and not with one party imposing rules upon the other.

2. All 90,000 pages of documentation generated in the House were turned over to the Senate during the Clinton impeachment. That it is in question whether documents in tRump’s impeachment will be entered is wholly inconsistent with how the Clinton impeachment trial was handled.

3. The question of witnesses in the Clinton impeachment was not of whether to call witnesses, but whether to recall witnesses that had already appeared in the House. Clinton himself testified on camera and under oath. None of the key witnesses have testified yet, because of the pResident’s interference.

4. The testimony of witnesses had decorum issues not faced in this impeachment. (Meaning this one isn’t about sex, it’s about using millions of DoD funds to benefit tRump’s re-election.)

...
Heavily paraphrased, but worth recounting, I found these points really compelling and I wish I’d taken a picture of the slide for this section of Schiff’s presentation.

LibfromtheNorth

(39 posts)
91. Well done Mr. Schiff
Tue Jan 21, 2020, 03:27 PM
Jan 2020

Schiff was absolutely amazing. Clear, concise and factual. Jay SUCKulow is speaking now so it's a good time for a dump run

Mersky

(4,986 posts)
94. Previously into ambulance chasing ads, sekulow is now
Tue Jan 21, 2020, 03:30 PM
Jan 2020

‘Defending’ a traitorous and dangerous fool like tRump.

I’m wondering if I can sue him for personal injury? Because I’m in pain just watching him.

nolabear

(42,001 posts)
101. They are playing to the ignorant public. Lying their asses off.
Tue Jan 21, 2020, 03:32 PM
Jan 2020

GOD if I never hear about that Schiff statement again...it's the only thing he's ever said that they give credence to, and they know it was sarcasm.

 

Liberalhammer

(576 posts)
110. One of the traitor lawyers
Tue Jan 21, 2020, 03:58 PM
Jan 2020

Said that Democrats are putting the senators on trial.

Yes the senators are on trial just as much as trump.

LittleGirl

(8,292 posts)
121. Process process, process
Tue Jan 21, 2020, 05:16 PM
Jan 2020

That’s his whole counter point argument ?

Really? Omg, this is disgusting! They won’t even defend 45. Bwahahaha

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»****LIVE IMPEACHMENT TRIA...