General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWould anyone here EVER say "Take her out!" when talking about firing someone?
I saw the headline on Facebook and IMMEDIATELY though "Holy shit! They have him on tape ordering someone killed." Then reading further it says he wanted her fired but that is the assumption the news has made. He probably did mean fired but there is now some reason to wonder and dig deeper on this. Trump uses a lot of mob phrases like "Rat" etc. It should not just be shrugged off that he only meant he wanted her fired.
hamsterjill
(15,224 posts)"Take her out" means exactly that. It's a reference to removing her at any and all cost, including physically.
She is right to be in fear for her life.
nini
(16,672 posts)but of course the media already made sure they defined what he meant.
We all know what he really meant which is why there was such a rush to get her out of there.
MineralMan
(146,339 posts)I also wouldn't tell GOP Senators their heads will be on pikes.
Death threats suck!
Bettie
(16,138 posts)literally, he could have simply said "I'm appointing a new ambassador, you are done there" and she'd have packed up and gone to whatever her next assignment would be, but he can't resist being a petty little motherfucker so he had to be as evil and nasty as possible.
bdamomma
(63,941 posts)horrible. We need to ruin his .....quid pro quo!
Bettie
(16,138 posts)he is the worst version of a human-shaped creature possible.
NewJeffCT
(56,829 posts)is probably the strongest wording I've heard in the corporate world in 30+ years.
Take Her Out - AT BEST - if it doesn't mean violence, would imply (to me) setting her up/framing her to justify firing her.
bdamomma
(63,941 posts)they called her and told her to get on the next flight. Horrible.
Boy, I could something about that phrase............oh Hi Agent Mike.
In_The_Wind
(72,300 posts)50 Shades Of Blue
(10,077 posts)coti
(4,612 posts)for a firing context, as aggressive as even that phrasing is.
jmg257
(11,996 posts)"Get rid of her!" is what the voice that appears to be Trumps is heard saying. "Get her out tomorrow. I don't care. Get her out tomorrow. Take her out. Okay? Do it."
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)You take opponents and obstacles to what you want out and you take them down. The typical low-level employee, no.
We haven't heard the entire story by any means. Our ambassador was the face of American force against Ukrainian, and thus Russian, corruption. All Ukrainian oligarchs have strong ties to Putin and organized crime, if they're not the crime leaders themselves. Why didn't Trump just take her out like a clerk? He wanted to since early 2017 and could always have just recalled "the woman," including when in April he demanded she be taken out! By tomorrow!. Didn't happen. Why?
Yovanovich's testimony was honest but not complete. Of necessity, no doubt. There must have been reasons, beyond Trump's malice, why she had to be taken out by elaborate schemes that took frustrating months for a bunch of criminal clowns to put together and screw up. And who else was involved? Pelosi says all Trump's roads lead to Russia.
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)He knows exactly what it means to "take someone out" implies. And I have no doubt that his meaning was not lost on those who were ordered.
arthritisR_US
(7,300 posts)brooklynite
(94,829 posts)You "take her out" for a nice dinner and then break the news?
bluestarone
(17,093 posts)It means just what it means! KILL her! None of these idiot senate rethugs are Americans, in my book!
BuffaloJackalope
(818 posts)They don't fire people from their job.