General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMulvaney issues a statement
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Mulvaney's lawyer has issued a statement on Bolton's book. h/t <a href="https://twitter.com/meridithmcgraw?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@meridithmcgraw</a> <a href="https://t.co/bTWlNHb8gX">pic.twitter.com/bTWlNHb8gX</a></p> Natasha Bertrand (@NatashaBertrand) <a href="
Link to tweet
?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 27, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
MontanaMama
(23,364 posts)Wonder why?
global1
(25,285 posts)jayschool2013
(2,314 posts)C_U_L8R
(45,027 posts)They're going down.
kentuck
(111,110 posts)Covering his ass.
nolabear
(42,001 posts)Phoenix61
(17,023 posts)come down to this. If you apply enough pressure to a bunch of sniveling cowards they always turn in each other.
MoonlitKnight
(1,584 posts)For further waiving privilege.
bluestarone
(17,091 posts)No recollection!
11 Bravo
(23,928 posts)Put them both under oath. What do you say, Mick?
Midnight Writer
(21,819 posts)Of course, in GOP Land, testifying under oath is by definition a "perjury trap".
Submariner
(12,512 posts)[link:
|happybird
(4,646 posts)Perfect.
Frustratedlady
(16,254 posts)Roland99
(53,342 posts)UNDER OATH
Sunsky
(1,737 posts)chowder66
(9,089 posts)lindysalsagal
(20,765 posts)When the gangster's shit-bombs start exploding, the scum will run for cover. And it will be a stampede.
struggle4progress
(118,379 posts)Still In Wisconsin
(4,450 posts)Of course, they won't do that because Micky's lame version of events would be blown out of the water.
Johonny
(20,918 posts)so ... ah ... there's that counter argument.