Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

madamesilverspurs

(15,811 posts) Mon Jan 27, 2020, 10:11 PM Jan 2020

the Dershowitz argument

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

the Dershowitz argument (Original Post) madamesilverspurs Jan 2020 OP

that is good. stillcool Jan 2020 #1

PRETZELS! PRETZELS! anybody want a PRETZEL! applegrove Jan 2020 #2

"Now I fully recognize and admit that a majority of vertebrates... RiverbendsJoe Jan 2020 #3

He kept his underwear on I hope nt doc03 Jan 2020 #4

I don't think he did. dgauss Jan 2020 #5

stillcool

(32,626 posts)

1. that is good.

Reply to madamesilverspurs (Original post)

Mon Jan 27, 2020, 10:16 PM

Jan 2020

reminds me of Steely Dan

applegrove

(118,845 posts)

2. PRETZELS! PRETZELS! anybody want a PRETZEL!

Reply to madamesilverspurs (Original post)

Mon Jan 27, 2020, 10:22 PM

Jan 2020

RiverbendsJoe

(81 posts)

3. "Now I fully recognize and admit that a majority of vertebrates...

Reply to madamesilverspurs (Original post)

Mon Jan 27, 2020, 10:24 PM

Jan 2020

...might well consider this position to be somewhat awkward, even painful. But I take deep offense at any suggestion that my constitutional reasoning smacks of 'contortionism.'"

doc03

(35,389 posts)

4. He kept his underwear on I hope nt

Reply to madamesilverspurs (Original post)

Mon Jan 27, 2020, 10:26 PM

Jan 2020

dgauss

(883 posts)

5. I don't think he did.

Reply to doc03 (Reply #4)

Mon Jan 27, 2020, 10:33 PM

Jan 2020

And thank God this is a metaphor.

Reply to this discussion