Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hunter should agree to be called as a witness and then answer every question with: I'll answer that (Original Post) rainy Jan 2020 OP
I think American would like him... Mike Nelson Jan 2020 #1
Ha ha you make good points. That would be so rainy Jan 2020 #2
K&R, .. or, " ...what are Ivankas qualifications for her current jobs ?! ... " uponit7771 Jan 2020 #3
Look, I get that they want to taint Joe, but all kinds of people can be witnesses... MichMan Jan 2020 #4
What? They are fact witnesses. This is precisely the point we are making tongue in Cheek. Hunter has rainy Jan 2020 #7
No, no, a thousand times NO! lark Jan 2020 #5
He should ignore the subpoena just like the pukes have. pwb Jan 2020 #6
No way in hell ScratchCat Jan 2020 #8

Mike Nelson

(9,973 posts)
1. I think American would like him...
Tue Jan 28, 2020, 09:31 AM
Jan 2020

... we'd see some Hunter 2020 signs! I'd love to see the Democrats question him... "Were you a part of the telephone call when President Trump said..." and, "Have you been coached by oral sex investigator Ken Starr?

rainy

(6,095 posts)
2. Ha ha you make good points. That would be so
Tue Jan 28, 2020, 09:38 AM
Jan 2020

great to have the Democrats question him about Trump’s impeachment facts of the case against him😆

MichMan

(11,999 posts)
4. Look, I get that they want to taint Joe, but all kinds of people can be witnesses...
Tue Jan 28, 2020, 09:42 AM
Jan 2020

...without themselves being charged with a crime. Neither Vindman or Bolton have been charged with anything, yet both are or could be called as witnesses.

rainy

(6,095 posts)
7. What? They are fact witnesses. This is precisely the point we are making tongue in Cheek. Hunter has
Tue Jan 28, 2020, 11:43 AM
Jan 2020

zero information about the facts of the charges against Trump

lark

(23,166 posts)
5. No, no, a thousand times NO!
Tue Jan 28, 2020, 10:32 AM
Jan 2020

This is a total fucking set up. Russia hacked Burisma just a week or 2 ago and you know damn well they did it for a reason - to help drumpf and hurt Biden. They've got faked documents ready to go, that is the point. Also, drumpf will never let Bolton actually testify. He's got RussianRepug Roberts to stop it when he claims Executive Privilege. So they want "us" to be smeared with the lie that started this to hurt Biden and help get rid of sanctions on Russia (remember, this is a 2 part scheme) while they forestall any and all relevant witnesses. They might agree to lying witnesses, like Pompeo & Mulvaney, since they would stonewall the truth, but will never ever let Bolton or any probitive witness.

Don't trust those nation destroying assholes, not one bit, and don't go fori t. There is no fairness in any of them, just lies and they will screw us if we deal without ironclad guarantees.

ScratchCat

(2,002 posts)
8. No way in hell
Tue Jan 28, 2020, 11:46 AM
Jan 2020

The only reason they want Hunter involved is to lend legitimacy to the hold on the aid. This is optics for the non-base Republicans who are tired of Trump. The only way to pull them back in is to "invoke Democrats" and pretend the hold on the aid was legitimate because of "crooked Democrats". They have to distract from the real narrative that Trump is a danger and using his power for personal gain.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Hunter should agree to be...