Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

JonLP24

(29,322 posts)
Tue Jan 28, 2020, 03:02 PM Jan 2020

Mitt makes his move

(Snip)

The Utah Republican has long been open to hearing from former national security adviser John Bolton and other witnesses in President Donald Trump’s impeachment trial, a position shared by Sens. Susan Collins (R-Maine) and Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska). The trio has searched for a fourth crucial vote to win a majority, but up until Sunday, those appeals seemed to be going nowhere.

Yet following a New York Times report that Trump told Bolton that frozen Ukrainian aid would be restored only if officials in Ukraine announced an investigation into Joe Biden and his son, Romney’s push for witnesses has some life — and some Republicans are displeased.

Romney “made a strong pitch” for witnesses during a closed-door lunch of Senate Republicans on Monday, according to Republicans familiar with the meeting. Meanwhile, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) urged his colleagues to wait until after Trump’s defense team finishes its presentation and senators go through a lengthy question-and-answer session to make a decision on what’s become the biggest issue of the trial.

But Romney is already making his move. And though he serves on the Republican whip team, Romney is now effectively working against party leaders and arguing to colleagues that the proper way to test each side’s contention is to hear from people directly involved in the Ukraine saga.

https://www.politico.com/amp/news/2020/01/27/romney-trial-impeachment-senate-trump-107171

32 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Mitt makes his move (Original Post) JonLP24 Jan 2020 OP
encouraging, but how pathetic that the "biggest issue of the trial" is whether to allow witnesses? unblock Jan 2020 #1
They don't struggle with the concept. They know full well the center will not hold, if direct AtheistCrusader Jan 2020 #9
i hope so, but i fear all allowing witnesses will do is let them claim it was "fair" unblock Jan 2020 #10
Maybe just maybe JustAnotherGen Jan 2020 #2
Interesting. That is a very good point. crickets Jan 2020 #5
If enough Republicans vote to remove Trump, I wonder how many of them are going to be angling Aristus Jan 2020 #3
There won't be one this close to the election. Mr.Bill Jan 2020 #16
+! 2naSalit Jan 2020 #27
An idea regarding witnesses PJMcK Jan 2020 #28
Good news. Plus Kelly and the fund-raising drought. lindysalsagal Jan 2020 #4
Live view of Mitt making his move irisblue Jan 2020 #6
My favorite definition of a leader: Mme. Defarge Jan 2020 #7
Someone's gunning for 2020/2024! marble falls Jan 2020 #8
He is looking toward a national future election. Your guess is as good as mine. usaf-vet Jan 2020 #11
Who remembers what Obama care was called before it was tagged a "Obamacare" as a political slap. usaf-vet Jan 2020 #15
If you remember Mitt's Presidential campaign... ProgressDiv Jan 2020 #18
But now we have a successful (unless your RW) Obamacare with a nation leaning to Medicare for All. usaf-vet Jan 2020 #19
Evern worse: "Romneycare" was an idea that came out of the very conservative Heritage Foundation. NCLefty Jan 2020 #24
He would clobber Pence in the primaries. n/t Mr.Bill Jan 2020 #17
Which primaries? JonLP24 Jan 2020 #20
Do you think Pence would be electable Mr.Bill Jan 2020 #21
I wasn't giving my opinions JonLP24 Jan 2020 #22
I think he may be considering a 2024 run bearsfootball516 Jan 2020 #26
Being the Senator who stood up to Trump and caused his removal should be historically appealing. Pepsidog Jan 2020 #12
His Margaret Chase Smith moment DeminPennswoods Jan 2020 #29
the best is to spread this trial over months AlexSFCA Jan 2020 #13
+1, begin the impeachment of Barr uponit7771 Jan 2020 #25
".....to hear from people directly involved in the Ukraine saga. pangaia Jan 2020 #14
Same, here. ChazInAz Jan 2020 #30
LOL !!! pangaia Jan 2020 #32
I remember the Kavanaugh hearings. argyl Jan 2020 #23
I find his positioning interesting to watch. calimary Jan 2020 #31

unblock

(52,392 posts)
1. encouraging, but how pathetic that the "biggest issue of the trial" is whether to allow witnesses?
Tue Jan 28, 2020, 03:08 PM
Jan 2020

witnesses and evidence are pretty basic to the concept of a trial.

remarkable that republicans struggle with such concepts when one it's a republican on trial....

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
9. They don't struggle with the concept. They know full well the center will not hold, if direct
Tue Jan 28, 2020, 04:51 PM
Jan 2020

testimony lands, because Trump CAN'T testify under oath.

It'll shatter the Republican lines. There will be defectors.
They lose when Bolton walks on to the Senate floor and swears in.

IF it happens, if the Republicans fail to prevent it, and IF Bolton isn't some double super reverse troll, it's going to be a moon landing moment.

unblock

(52,392 posts)
10. i hope so, but i fear all allowing witnesses will do is let them claim it was "fair"
Tue Jan 28, 2020, 04:56 PM
Jan 2020

i think the senate republicans' primary goal now is to make it not look like they're in on the cover-up, which they obviously are.

refusing to allow witnesses has become too blatant, so i think they're going to have to allow bolton to testify.

but "all" he will do is confirm that donnie did exactly what he's accused of doing.

the republicans in the senate can still say it "doesn't rise to the level" needed for removal. but then they're be able to claim at least they had a "fair" trial.

JustAnotherGen

(31,962 posts)
2. Maybe just maybe
Tue Jan 28, 2020, 03:53 PM
Jan 2020

He's thinking he can grab control from McConnell. If he grabs power from McConnel - the landscape of this changes considerably.

crickets

(25,987 posts)
5. Interesting. That is a very good point.
Tue Jan 28, 2020, 04:18 PM
Jan 2020

I have been wondering what personal gain he was going for (because you know there is at least one) and you may have hit right on it.

Aristus

(66,481 posts)
3. If enough Republicans vote to remove Trump, I wonder how many of them are going to be angling
Tue Jan 28, 2020, 03:56 PM
Jan 2020

to be appointed Pence's VP.

Mr.Bill

(24,338 posts)
16. There won't be one this close to the election.
Tue Jan 28, 2020, 05:34 PM
Jan 2020

And Pelosi's House has to approve whoever it is. They still have time to impeach Pence and make Pelosi president, although that's a long shot and probably not her intention. Pence is as guilty as Trump in this matter.

PJMcK

(22,059 posts)
28. An idea regarding witnesses
Wed Jan 29, 2020, 09:04 AM
Jan 2020

If the Senate is forced by public opinion to open the Trump trial to witnesses, consider who could be called: not just Bolton but McGahn, Priebus, Kelly, Giuliani and... wait for it... Pence. If Pence is shown to have been a participant in the Ukraine scandal (which I believe he is), or if he perjures himself in his deposition and testimony, he will be tremendously vulnerable politically.

The Democrats should also try to call Trump to testify. It will never happen but the symbolism of Trump defying Congress would be a powerful one.

By the way, let the Bidens be called, too. Joe Biden would wipe the floor with any Republican who tried to lie about him. More importantly, it will add the the overwhelming lack of evidence that Hunter Biden did anything illegal.

lindysalsagal

(20,751 posts)
4. Good news. Plus Kelly and the fund-raising drought.
Tue Jan 28, 2020, 04:08 PM
Jan 2020

All very good news. Speaker Pelosi is a genius. ?️

Mme. Defarge

(8,055 posts)
7. My favorite definition of a leader:
Tue Jan 28, 2020, 04:26 PM
Jan 2020

A leader is someone grounded in hope and, together with followers, acts with courage to make an inauthentic situation authentic.

Alas, I do not recall the source of this.

usaf-vet

(6,221 posts)
11. He is looking toward a national future election. Your guess is as good as mine.
Tue Jan 28, 2020, 04:57 PM
Jan 2020

He at least doesn't want to be on the wrong side of history. And is putting himself forward a a "party leader for the future".

We should be skeptically happy with this move.

usaf-vet

(6,221 posts)
15. Who remembers what Obama care was called before it was tagged a "Obamacare" as a political slap.
Tue Jan 28, 2020, 05:14 PM
Jan 2020

Well if memory serves me right it was Massachusetts State Health plan tagged Romneycare. Maybe Mitt likes the sound of that and would like it to be nationwide? Just a thought.

 

ProgressDiv

(31 posts)
18. If you remember Mitt's Presidential campaign...
Tue Jan 28, 2020, 05:39 PM
Jan 2020

... he pretended he had nothing to do with Romney Care. He ran away from it, not towards it. (After spending years touting it as an accomplishment.)

usaf-vet

(6,221 posts)
19. But now we have a successful (unless your RW) Obamacare with a nation leaning to Medicare for All.
Tue Jan 28, 2020, 06:58 PM
Jan 2020

Romney ran away because the idea of a national healthcare plan was a hot political issue. Now that Obamacare (ACA) has had the success and tens of MILLIONS want it improved to the next level. Fixing Obamacare to become in the next version Romneycare might in fact work.

NCLefty

(3,678 posts)
24. Evern worse: "Romneycare" was an idea that came out of the very conservative Heritage Foundation.
Wed Jan 29, 2020, 05:34 AM
Jan 2020

And their entire party suddenly declared it the great Satan because a Democrat picked it up, foolishly thinking that conservatives might be more on board with their own plan.

JonLP24

(29,322 posts)
20. Which primaries?
Tue Jan 28, 2020, 07:12 PM
Jan 2020

I recall interviews with Republican voters in the 2022 election and a lot of voters said they didn't like Romney but beating Obama was the most important issue for them. Now that Trump is President I doubt that Romney is electable argument will win again.

Mr.Bill

(24,338 posts)
21. Do you think Pence would be electable
Tue Jan 28, 2020, 07:27 PM
Jan 2020

against any of the leading Democratic candidates if Trump was removed from office?

JonLP24

(29,322 posts)
22. I wasn't giving my opinions
Tue Jan 28, 2020, 07:30 PM
Jan 2020

I was giving the opinion of right wingers who voted for Romney even though they didn't like him.

AlexSFCA

(6,139 posts)
13. the best is to spread this trial over months
Tue Jan 28, 2020, 05:08 PM
Jan 2020

so if trump is removed, pence won’t have much time to campaign. And house can add more articles of impeachment as they continue their investigation and as court cases against trump move through - especially emoluments clause case is most straightforward.

pangaia

(24,324 posts)
14. ".....to hear from people directly involved in the Ukraine saga.
Tue Jan 28, 2020, 05:09 PM
Jan 2020

And the Bidens have NOTHING to do with any freaking saga.

BTW SAGA was the name of the food supplier for the dorms when I was a freshman in college.!

calimary

(81,540 posts)
31. I find his positioning interesting to watch.
Wed Jan 29, 2020, 12:02 PM
Jan 2020

Romney’s been a Governor and a presidential candidate. That is - someone used to being in the Number-One position. The Alpha.

In the Senate, he is one-of-100. He won’t be in an officially-designated leader or “top-dog” position unless he eventually maneuvers to replace Ol’ Moscow as caucus leader.

Maybe this is part of what we’re now seeing? An attempt to stand out from the pack and assert a leader position. He certainly stands out now.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Mitt makes his move