Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsGOP Senators Want To See The Bolton Manuscript
https://www.cnn.com/2020/01/28/politics/james-lankford-john-bolton-manuscript-cnntv/index.htmlCNN: GOP senator says they've 'got to be able to see' Bolton manuscript before witness vote
Washington (CNN) Republican Sen. James Lankford of Oklahoma said Tuesday that senators participating in President Donald Trump's impeachment trial have "got to be able to see" the book manuscript of former national security adviser John Bolton before they vote on whether to include witnesses in the proceedings.
"We have to resolve in a couple of days if we need witnesses or not -- this is an issue that's outstanding that we don't have a good way to be able to answer," Lankford told CNN's Dana Bash. "We can't say six weeks from now we'll be able to see it. We've got to be able to see it in advance to be able to make that decision on witnesses in a couple days."
Asked if seeing the manuscript would "be in lieu" of having Bolton testify in the trial, Lankford said that was not what he was suggesting.
"No, this is read the manuscript to be able to see if we need to call John Bolton, so that question's unanswered," he said. "We won't know how to answer that question until we get through today's testimony, a couple of days still of questions. I'm just saying this needs to be a part of our information so we can make that decision about witnesses."
"We have to resolve in a couple of days if we need witnesses or not -- this is an issue that's outstanding that we don't have a good way to be able to answer," Lankford told CNN's Dana Bash. "We can't say six weeks from now we'll be able to see it. We've got to be able to see it in advance to be able to make that decision on witnesses in a couple days."
Asked if seeing the manuscript would "be in lieu" of having Bolton testify in the trial, Lankford said that was not what he was suggesting.
"No, this is read the manuscript to be able to see if we need to call John Bolton, so that question's unanswered," he said. "We won't know how to answer that question until we get through today's testimony, a couple of days still of questions. I'm just saying this needs to be a part of our information so we can make that decision about witnesses."
I don't see how the Senate reads the manuscript and then concludes they don't need Bolton's Testimony. Romney is already whipping for Bolton to testify.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
12 replies, 990 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (6)
ReplyReply to this post
12 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
GOP Senators Want To See The Bolton Manuscript (Original Post)
berni_mccoy
Jan 2020
OP
The White House should have sent Boltons manuscript to the Senate. They had it for a month?
pwb
Jan 2020
#4
hibbing
(10,110 posts)1. Maybe they will doctor the manuscript
Just like the "transcript" tiny hands keeps referring to. It is not a transcript.
Peace
Me.
(35,454 posts)2. Why Doesn't He Ask THe WH For A Copy?
ok_cpu
(2,056 posts)3. "We really want to cover this up,
but need to know if it'll bite us in the ass."
pwb
(11,294 posts)4. The White House should have sent Boltons manuscript to the Senate. They had it for a month?
Incompetence on display.
defacto7
(13,485 posts)9. Do you realize how many bedtimes it takes to read it to tRump?
OnDoutside
(19,982 posts)5. There goes Bolton's $2m book advance....
Raven
(13,905 posts)6. I wonder what's in it that Trump doesn't want them to see. Otherwise they'd
have it by now.
onenote
(42,794 posts)7. If they want to see it they should admit it as evidence and enter it into the record.
yonder
(9,683 posts)11. +1. Exactly!
lame54
(35,332 posts)8. They can go to his book signing after they acquit Trump
robbob
(3,539 posts)10. Hilarious:
They dont want Boltons account entered in the record, they want to read it so they can announce (as the defense council already has) that there is nothing there.
kskiska
(27,048 posts)12. They'll read it like a dirty book
under a blanket by flashlight.