General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJustice Ginsburg bringing up the Whitewater investigation
Cristian Farias @cristianafarias 8mJustice Ruth Bader Ginsburg bringing up the Whitewater investigation, which subpoenaed personal Bill Clinton records, while Brett Kavanaugh, who was part of that investigation, is hearing this same case is ... so wild. twitter.com/cristianafarias/status/1260210285262131201
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
Jamastiene
(38,187 posts)She's so bad ass. I love her.
iluvtennis
(19,883 posts)Raster
(20,998 posts)...after all, he was one of the chief legal architects for the Clinton impeachment.
NoMoreRepugs
(9,482 posts)Wounded Bear
(58,751 posts)kairos12
(12,883 posts)Mr. Ected
(9,674 posts)Supreme Court precedents don't apply to Republicans!
It's right there in the Constitution, next to "Obamagate".
There's nothing just about GOP justice.
SergeStorms
(19,204 posts)IOKIYAR. Pronounced: EYE-OKIE-YAR It's OK If You're A Republican
Synonym: flaming hypocrite
Antonym: Democrat
Tommy_Carcetti
(43,219 posts)bigtree
(86,008 posts)iluvtennis
(19,883 posts)Delmette2.0
(4,174 posts)He turned over the WH tapes minus 14 minutes, but it was all incriminating anyway. The Dipshit and his advisors know this but won't admit it.
avebury
(10,952 posts)NPR audio feed: https://cdn.jwplayer.com/players/XGngqbNj-poE3f2TR.html
mnhtnbb
(31,409 posts)avebury
(10,952 posts)Fla Dem
(23,805 posts)leftieNanner
(15,179 posts)How did The Orange One's lawyer answer?
maxsolomon
(33,432 posts)they lied.
lastlib
(23,335 posts)gab13by13
(21,446 posts)but I think Trump's lawyer is doing a better job that the House lawyer. I have a bad feeling about this.
LenaBaby61
(6,979 posts)The House lawyer arguing the case for fat ass to turn over his taxes to Congress could be Clarence Darrow, but let's not forget that the High Court is still 5-4 putin-leaning thanks to Evil MoscowMitch. I have the same sinking feeling that you do that this ruling will be going fat asses way
bigtree
(86,008 posts)...I think the institutionalists like Roberts will consider deeply how their vote will enable or effect the incoming Democratic administration.
Link to tweet
RhodeIslandOne
(5,042 posts)Unfortunately, the other assholes do not care.
Kablooie
(18,644 posts)Whitewater was different because the Clintons were criminals.
The fact they never found any criminality just means they were very good at hiding it.
So there!
And then the Republican has to walk away as fast as possible to avoid responses.
yellowcanine
(35,702 posts)SunSeeker
(51,746 posts)saidsimplesimon
(7,888 posts)She stands for the "rule of law" in a lawless presidential administration. I respect her, and wish she was my surrogate mother so that I could hug her.
Hermit-The-Prog
(33,488 posts)Linda Ed
(493 posts)Absolute immunity isnt a thing. This should be an absolutely scathing 9-0 decision from SCOTUS. I'm wondering if enough SC Justices will think of their legacy, immunity from retribution, and their country - and make the correct call here... Be prepared for the 3 am rage tweets....
Yet a week from now he will still be in power all of his cronies will still be committing crimes and nothing will have changed.
They will delay ruling - late summer.
whistler162
(11,155 posts)wendyb-NC
(3,335 posts)MissMillie
(38,589 posts)She's better than all five conservative SCOTUS justices added together.
Vinca
(50,319 posts)One thing that surprised me was how brief it was. I don't know what I expected, but I guess I thought it would be a day long affair. In any case, it was hard to detect much sympathy for the Trump position from anyone. If they decide for Trump, after all, they would be telling the world the Supremes were wrong on Watergate, Jones and Whitewater and that the founders were wrong when they decided to have a president and not a king.