General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIf the Senate does not approve a 1/6 Commission, the AG should appoint a Special Counsel?
They cannot be permitted to sweep it under the rug. Also, they should not be able to delay it for a couple of months, and still insist it be done by the end of the year, either.
It is time to get serious with this matter.
Everybody knows what happened. It just needs to be validated by the DOJ.
Let the Republicans know ahead of time what is going to happen. If they attempt to block this Commission, a Special Counsel will be appointed.
tableturner
(1,685 posts)StarfishSaver
(18,486 posts)Which would require a vote by the House and Senate.
So, the short answer to your question is no.
kentuck
(111,110 posts)Did the House vote on Mueller?
The Special Counsel would report to the AG, correct?
Why would a Commission be preferable?
StarfishSaver
(18,486 posts)His activities and budget and subpoena power were very limited. He only investigated what the AG already had the authority to investigate.
The commission and potential committee the Speaker could form would have much broader authorities, powers and budgets than the DOJ has. If DOJ was going to do those things, Congress would have to vote to grant those broader powers and give DOJ a larger budget.
There are things the AG can do that Congress can't (e.g., conduct criminal investigations, convene grand juries, indict and prosecute people, etc.), things that Congress can do that the AG can't do. A commission or committee is necessary to carry out those latter activities that the AG either doesn't have the authority to do or doesn't have the budget, staffing and expertise to handle. That's why it's important for there to be a commission or committee working while the AG focuses on the criminal investigations and prosecutions that it is working on.
Of course, they'll cooperate and coordinate, but the work needs to be spread out.
kentuck
(111,110 posts)Would a Special Counsel be preferable to a Select Committee?
Speaker Pelosi can appoint a select committee to do most of the things a commission would do, many of which DOJ can't.
Under Merrick Garland, DOJ is doing everything a Special Counsel would do.
kentuck
(111,110 posts)StarfishSaver
(18,486 posts)McCarthy may be able to appoint Members, so it's possible.
kentuck
(111,110 posts)By people like Jordan and a few others?
StarfishSaver
(18,486 posts)Jordan being on the committee does not mean he can sabotage it. He's one person with very little power.
He was on the House Judiciary Committee and didn't sabotage the impeachment.
We need to stop looking for ways to complain that this process or that process won't be perfect. No process will be perfect and in a divided government, there is no way to move forward without some Republican involvement.
kentuck
(111,110 posts)I agree.
gohuskies
(1,158 posts)to investigate and screw the composition equality guardrails that the rethugs wish to use to cover up their stinking corruption and complicity in the insurrection. This charade of bi-partianship will never work. They proved this when they persisted to go after Hillary Clinton over Benghazi and before that with Ken Starr's actual witch hunt for Travelgate and Whitewater that led to the Lewinsky mess. Screw the GQP.
Fiendish Thingy
(15,695 posts)A HSC would have more power, including subpoena powers, than the compromise commission in the current proposed legislation.
And it will all be televised, unlike DOJ or Special Counsel investigations- and DOJs indictments will continue regardless.
Chainfire
(17,708 posts)StarfishSaver
(18,486 posts)Being in power doesn't mean just shoving things down people's throat and rushing in wily nily.
Just like impeachment, foundations and groundwork must be laid. A lot is occurring behind the scenes so that when a committee is formed, it's ready to go from day one. Just because you can't see it happening doesn't mean it's not.