Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Klaralven

(7,510 posts)
Tue Nov 23, 2021, 11:06 PM Nov 2021

The Right Is Using Waukesha As a Weapon Against Bail Reform

Brooks has a lengthy criminal history, with more than a dozen arrests going back to 1999, the Journal Sentinel reported. On Monday, the office of Milwaukee County District Attorney John Chisholm said Brooks’ bail was set “inappropriately low” and “not consistent” with the DA’s “approach toward matters involving violent crime,” and pledged an internal review of the bail recommendation.

But although Chisholm’s office quickly said Brooks’ low bail was a mistake, conservative politicians and commentators immediately seized on the story as evidence that the broader push for bail reform is at fault for the tragedy.

In particular, they highlighted a 2018 tweet from Chisholm—who was first elected in 2006—promoting an assistant district attorney’s quote on the office’s effort to “not keeping individuals held unnecessarily on cash bail in the Milwaukee County Jail.”


...

On Tuesday, Masters tweeted a screenshot from a 2013 Milwaukee Journal Sentinel report on Chisholm’s office’s diversion programs for nonviolent drug offenders, which references a Chisholm quote from six years before that. “Is there going to be an individual I divert, or I put into treatment program, who's going to go out and kill somebody?” Chisholm told the Journal Sentinel in 2007. “You bet. Guaranteed. It's guaranteed to happen. It does not invalidate the overall approach.”

https://www.vice.com/en/article/3abqmn/waukesha-darrell-brooks-bail-reform

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Right Is Using Waukesha As a Weapon Against Bail Reform (Original Post) Klaralven Nov 2021 OP
His office exboyfil Nov 2021 #1
Appalling decision on the judge's part.. whathehell Nov 2021 #3
John Chisholm in his own words 2007 Devil Child Nov 2021 #2
The bail amount is irrelevant. TheRealNorth Nov 2021 #4
Ok whathehell Nov 2021 #8
But now it's $5 million. Igel Nov 2021 #10
To a certain extent... TheRealNorth Nov 2021 #11
One problem I see is that the court backlog is so long that you just can't keep people locked up MichMan Nov 2021 #5
Don't give them the subject to take and run with. jimfields33 Nov 2021 #6
Well, some social justice warriors have advocated for leniency TheRealNorth Nov 2021 #7
Being a proud social justice worker myself, whathehell Nov 2021 #9

exboyfil

(17,871 posts)
1. His office
Tue Nov 23, 2021, 11:22 PM
Nov 2021

He should have had overrides in place for low bail for someone who attempts to run another person over (and that is just one of the charges).

If the GOP had ordered this thing up from central casting, it could be no more perfect. Expect them to Willie Horton this all the way through 2022.

whathehell

(29,136 posts)
3. Appalling decision on the judge's part..
Tue Nov 23, 2021, 11:34 PM
Nov 2021

This guy tried to run over his girlfriend with his car..I would call this
Atempted Murder -- and he's let out on $1,000 bail? Incredibly irresponsible.

The poster above is right.-- The bill should have contained overrides for those charged with violent crime, especially something as serious as Attempted Murder.

 

Devil Child

(2,728 posts)
2. John Chisholm in his own words 2007
Tue Nov 23, 2021, 11:33 PM
Nov 2021
"Is there going to be an individual I divert, or I put into treatment program, who's going to go out and kill somebody?" Chisholm said in a 2007 interview with the Journal Sentinel. "You bet. Guaranteed. It's guaranteed to happen. It does not invalidate the overall approach."


Provided so you can read the entirety of the original 2007 article that Vice references.

https://archive.jsonline.com/watchdog/noquarter/overdose-death-highlights-deferred-prosecutions-in-milwaukee-county-b99101314z1-224745852.html/?page=1

TheRealNorth

(9,514 posts)
4. The bail amount is irrelevant.
Tue Nov 23, 2021, 11:52 PM
Nov 2021

Bail is used to ensure a person shows up to court. The question is whether he should have been released at all, given his history or priors.

Igel

(35,423 posts)
10. But now it's $5 million.
Wed Nov 24, 2021, 10:38 AM
Nov 2021

Sometimes bail is set in a way that theoretically allows release but practically denies it.

$1000 basically says, "Yeah, you can go."

I don't think he should have been released, but part of that is in hindsight. Harris County, TX, altered its bail policies. A couple of years later, an analysis showed that a lot of those released without bail in year one were back at the beginning of year two for something worse, and by the end of year two had moved up from trivial to felony. Causing a pushback--how many people that messed up one are worth being let out without trial given the harm that some will cause to their neighborhoods?

TheRealNorth

(9,514 posts)
11. To a certain extent...
Wed Nov 24, 2021, 06:08 PM
Nov 2021

The severity of the crime can increase the the flight risk. If the crime you are accused of is a guarantee of life in prison, a person is more likely to go on the run then if you are busted for a crime where the max penalty is something like 90 days.

Not sure why the bail is 5 million now - the guy is a danger to others and should not be out of jail period. Why a person like him should be released only if they have 5 million is beyond me.

Plus, I do think politics plays into the judge and DA's decisions.

MichMan

(12,029 posts)
5. One problem I see is that the court backlog is so long that you just can't keep people locked up
Wed Nov 24, 2021, 12:36 AM
Nov 2021

I have a friend who was killed in July 2020 after being struck as a pedestrian by a hit and run driver doing a burnout in a parking lot. The unlicensed driver fled the scene and turned themselves in the next day. There was no disputing the facts of the case.

Due I suppose to the pandemic, and who knows what other reasons, the sentencing didn't happen for 15 months, even though there was a plea deal and no trial. 15 months !

TheRealNorth

(9,514 posts)
7. Well, some social justice warriors have advocated for leniency
Wed Nov 24, 2021, 01:12 AM
Nov 2021

Because racial minorities are more likely to get caught up in the criminal justice system. I think the attempt to correct the racial biases in the system have either gone too far or are being implemented poorly for whatever reason.

Funny that those same voices that wanted to let criminals out of jail because of Covid are nowhere to be found now.

whathehell

(29,136 posts)
9. Being a proud social justice worker myself,
Wed Nov 24, 2021, 06:31 AM
Nov 2021

I can attest to the fact that neither I, nor any of my fellows SJWs, advocate for lenience in cases of attempted murder.
.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Right Is Using Waukes...