General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDonald Trump's Trials Should Not Be Televised
Trump is no mere apprentice when it comes to manipulating the media in his favor.By Marjorie Cohn, TruthOut August 8, 2023
https://truthout.org/articles/donald-trumps-trials-should-not-be-televised
Be careful what you wish for, Democrats. Trump lawyer John Lauro said he would love to see his clients January 6 trial televised. Lauro must know that Trump is a master at manipulating the media and a televised trial could put undue pressure on jurors to acquit him.
SNIP
Its one thing to televise the proceedings of the House of Representatives Select Committee to Investigate the January 6 Attack on the U.S. Capitol; its quite another to broadcast Trumps criminal trials.
These two proceedings have very different functions. The January 6 Committee hearings were designed to provide the viewing public with information about Trumps actions leading to the insurrection at the Capitol on January 6. The purpose of a criminal trial is for a jury to examine the evidence and decide whether Trump is guilty or innocent of the charges; it is not to educate the public.
SNIP
==========
Interesting perspective I had not considered.
Effete Snob
(8,387 posts)Eliot Rosewater
(31,229 posts)Poiuyt
(18,150 posts)When everyone sees the evidence, they won't want the country to see them as biased idiots.
Having said that, I agree that televising the trial would turn it into a circus.
Glamrock
(11,808 posts)In order to manipulate the media, hed have to testify. If there is anyone in the world who should never testify in his own defense, its that asshole. Im not worried.
diva77
(7,743 posts)Glamrock
(11,808 posts)1) This is the most significant case of this century that will define the path of this country for generations.
2) Count 4 is him depriving the rights of voters. We cant all be in the courtroom.
Needs to be televised.
deRien
(170 posts)easily solved. No camera on Trump, lawyers, jury, etc. If he isn't seen or heard, he can only cause minimal problems. If it's not televised, he can come out of the courtroom and say anything he wants i.e. lies ~ very few people would read the transcripts. Do you want what happened in the courtroom to be screened through the media?
Effete Snob
(8,387 posts)I was taught to read many years ago, and dont need anyone to filter a transcript I can read myself.
deRien
(170 posts)that I said "very few" will read the transcript.
lastlib
(23,552 posts)Future generations will ask whether TFG was treated fairly. With video, there is no way to dispute the fairness of the proceedings.
I think the C-SPAN model for televising Congressional proceedings would work reasonably well. One camera, taking in the proceedings at the rostrum. Yes, the lawyers for AnusMouth will play for the cameras, but the BS they spew would be pretty discernible.
Think Nuremberg......
rsdsharp
(9,310 posts)His only chance to talk would be on the stand, and Trump doesnt have guts enough to testify; the prosecutors would bury him.
Mr.Bill
(24,438 posts)with the video by editing and using AI.
lastlib
(23,552 posts)Mr.Bill
(24,438 posts)who would be seeing what they want to see.
lastlib
(23,552 posts)If there is a genuine Lost Cause, I suppose it's MAGAts.
walkingman
(7,834 posts)The right-wing news channels will continue to lie regardless but it will be easy to fact check their BS.
kentuck
(111,166 posts)They didn't even watch it.
Would they watch a trial of Donald John Trump?
People need to know just what he has done to our country and our democracy.
lastlib
(23,552 posts)I suspect FOOL's* trial would be just as salacious.
diva77
(7,743 posts)was a possible factor.
Mr.Bill
(24,438 posts)The prosection did not prove their case. They were very inept.
WarGamer
(12,759 posts)It's the RIGHT thing to do.
Sunlight is the best disinfectant and all that...
The public deserves to see it all, gavel to gavel.
diva77
(7,743 posts)I didn't post the article because I agreed with it - but the author made some good points. However, I am still undecided.
Mr.Bill
(24,438 posts)but it should be filmed.
doc03
(35,569 posts)PJMcK
(22,148 posts)It was a shit show. The judge, Ito, had nearly no control over the courtroom.
The Defendants lawyers performed for the cameras and encouraged witnesses to do the same.
The trial lasted a year and demonstrated incompetence by the prosecutors and the court.
Dont feed Trumps ego. Do NOT televise his trials.
stillcool
(32,626 posts)and be able to see them saying it. Otherwise, it's the Trump trash-talk-tv show 24/7. I guess if you aren't curious about the actual legal proceedings, it doesn't matter?
Earth-shine
(4,044 posts)Trump said the same thing.
They are posturing. They are saying the exact opposite of what they want so they can have trial-by-media.
They don't want the actual trial televised.
They only want their sound bites to be public.
FakeNoose
(33,306 posts)... then all we'll get are outraged, deranged, fake news rantings from Chump-humping "journalists" EVERY SINGLE DAY. America needs to see this trial (in Washington) and digest the daily events in real-time.
I watched the Watergate hearings every day, and I watched the OJ Simpson trial almost every day. I saw almost all of the House Select Committee's January 6th hearings. It's possible to show a real legal proceedings (or daily televised synopses) without invoking riots in America.
In the absence of truthful real-time reportage, I believe riots will take place. Because ... Faux Noise.