Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
W/so much discussion about 14th A, paragraph 3, Francs Mathew is having great day (Original Post) duhneece Sep 2023 OP
And YOU, my dearest friend, are in part, if not wholly, responsible for this being accomplished BComplex Sep 2023 #1
It was this courageous judge who made this a first duhneece Sep 2023 #5
I'm THRILLED to see so much 'discussion' about 14-3! MyOwnPeace Sep 2023 #2
Amen! duhneece Sep 2023 #6
This story is from a year ago Fiendish Thingy Sep 2023 #3
His ruling from a year ago about 14-3 and Couy is being justified currently duhneece Sep 2023 #4

BComplex

(8,066 posts)
1. And YOU, my dearest friend, are in part, if not wholly, responsible for this being accomplished
Sun Sep 3, 2023, 06:08 PM
Sep 2023

ultimately. You stayed on this, and took a whole mess of crap from Couy and his enablers for it!

You are the New Mexico BOMB, lady!!!

duhneece

(4,118 posts)
5. It was this courageous judge who made this a first
Mon Sep 4, 2023, 01:45 AM
Sep 2023

He alone set a precedent.
Now it’s being discussed and justified.
He’s got to be walking around with a smile on his face.

MyOwnPeace

(16,938 posts)
2. I'm THRILLED to see so much 'discussion' about 14-3!
Sun Sep 3, 2023, 06:13 PM
Sep 2023

We NEED to get action on this - yes, it does need to go 'under appeal' - charges are now being filed. We KNOW that the tRumpists will cry holy-hell about them and file appeals.

GOOD!

We need to take this way up - way fast to the Supreme Court! Why?

Because THEY will be the ultimate 'deciders' (yeah, that's what "W" said he was ) about whether this will be one way to keep IQ45 from EVER holding public office again! And while it may 'fry the butts' of several sitting Justices - those 'originalists' will have to choke on their own vomit to rule against this claim!

The way things have been going with the courts - especially the 'Supremes' - nothing would surprise me. But this is one issue we need to resolve NOW - either it IS or it IS NOT!

It would make for great TV drama to see how the SCOTUS could tell 2 of the Federalist Society 'scholars' that they don't know what they're talking about!

We're moving, friends. Pressure everywhere. We've got to keep it going!

Fiendish Thingy

(15,657 posts)
3. This story is from a year ago
Sun Sep 3, 2023, 06:28 PM
Sep 2023

Judge Mathew has not weighed in on the current discussion over Trump being disqualified under the 14th amendment, so I’m not sure where you get the idea that the judge is “having a great day”…

duhneece

(4,118 posts)
4. His ruling from a year ago about 14-3 and Couy is being justified currently
Sun Sep 3, 2023, 11:09 PM
Sep 2023

He’s not so alone in his judgment and ruling. That has to feel good

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»W/so much discussion abou...