Try to anyway. I don’t see the delete button. I’m not that much of a techie and I admit I’m a little embarrassed about that.

It is at the bottom of your Op and or comments.

Done

I believe her.

I think is the way it goes. I've never seen it, but never was in close proximity to such matters; hence I enjoy listening to these guys, with such experience.

And Joyce seemed to think Jack Smith has already done that. I thought that was pretty interesting.

the solicitor general. Neal Katyal said they are rarely done and he only had one during his time (for all 50 states) and seems it was Joyce Vance's case. She said that the 11th circuit did remove the judge in that case, as they felt it is difficult for a judge to change their thinking when their order is overturned.

My high-powered DC lawyer daughter had knee replacement Monday so I’m in her Capitol Hill townhouse with her for couple of weeks .

She said the same thing in response to Joyce Vance and Neil Katyl tonite. She thinks Smith is ready to go to the 11th circuit who will remove Judge Loose Cannon, replace her with real judge, and go to trial well before November .

Frankly, it wouldn't surprise me if Donnie has had words with her in the past few weeks.

I don't think the defendant communicates quite that openly though. By recently appearing in a court hearing he was not required to attend, he was sending a signal that if she is fully on his team, he will appoint her to the USSC. It would be an associate that communicated with her in a more direct manner.

Thank you for this.

I have great respect for Joyce Vance. And a high opinion of Lawrence. And a heck of a lot of people think that Mr. Smith has just put the case back on track.

Once the jury is enpaneled, a judgement of dismissal by Loose Cannon means double jeopardy would attach and Bozo could not be retried. Jack Smith is smart.

it took Smith so long to respond to Cannon’s batshit crazy jury instructions. Maybe the reason is that he was going to the solicitor first.

This is encouraging news thanks for posting.

That’s a fact. I’m sure there are a myriad of reasons why he’s doing that, with delay being the number one reason.

He always has and always will.

He's like a machine. In capable of making rational decisions, even to protect himself. He will test the judges until they lock him up.

in a case where she presides she perverts the rule of law. But hey, it's OK if you're a Republican

About the jury being seated and Cannon dismissing the trial worries me. How in the world could she do that?

she favors. A judge is supposed to be impartial, equal footings and justice for ALL.

gets. I have confidence in him. Let it play out

He may not have even a good case for mandamus according to some.

Loosely defined, it's suing the judge to do her job and issue rulings she is required to issue.

Sure, she is kicking cans down the road, but is she at the point of legally being legally behind?

Dunno. Not a lawyer. But I'm not telling jack what he should do. I don't know jack.

let it happen, and the trial goes on, will it be effected by whatever the SC decides on the immunity issue?

I have heard some say it wouldn't have bearing on this document case because he was no longer President when he defied the law to return them and the SC is only deciding whether a President has full immunity while in office?

Is this correct?

I will believe it when I see it.

She is the judge. She's supposed to know the law and explain what the law means. The jury has to sort the facts and see if they fit the law. As I understood all the tv explanations.

or law if you prefer, that says no judge can preside over a case where the defendant is the one who appointed that judge. Sounds like that would just be common sense.