General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIf you think these fascists and white supremacists won't try to get rid of the 13th Amendment
Dream on
Today the group in Arizona went back to 1864.
That is all
RKP5637
(67,112 posts)Johonny
(21,137 posts)Loophole built right in the amendment.
wackadoo wabbit
(1,167 posts)Hekate
(91,423 posts)Minus the selling and buying part. But the snitch laws and the no-travel laws are insane, and absolutely hark back to slavery laws.
The cartoonist Horsey got it immediately:
keep_left
(1,843 posts)Rec
TheRealNorth
(9,514 posts)To "rent" the labor.
onetexan
(13,130 posts)unblock
(52,768 posts)If a woman body is being used against her will in service of the government, the fetus, and perhaps the father, and they the have eliminated or criminalized any alternative, how is this not 40 weeks of slavery, at least involuntary servitude?
The 13th amendment didn't narrowly ban commercial of lifelong slavery. It banned all slavery and involuntary servitude. How does forcing a woman to carry a fetus to term not fall until this definition?
Hekate
(91,423 posts)
belonging to men via holy matrimony and already subject to them always.
The First-Wave Feminists were quite fiery on the subject of womens servitude. They said women had fewer rights than children, criminals, and idiots (idiots meaning the severely mentally impaired) .
Impelled by moral imperatives they chose to concentrate on the abolition of Negro chattel slavery (again, terminology of the time) but the struggle for womens rights as human beings has never ceased.
calimary
(81,821 posts)Man came first - the first shot ch being created by God. Then God came around to the idea that Man shouldnt be alone but deserved a partner. So God took a rib from Adam and made a woman from it.
Whats the message, then?
Simple: Man came first.
And a woman was brought in, as the Second, to satisfy the needs of the First, and stop him from being lonely. So what was in it for her? Um - well, nobody ever bothered to finish THAT sentence or think that far. Evidently whoever originally wrote that didnt think any farther than what the mans needs were.
Sexism for the ages, and all forms of understanding or definition of a Supreme Being.
malaise
(270,014 posts)That is bullshit made up by men
calimary
(81,821 posts)As I watch the steady march thats now trampling womens rights under big muddy boots, I wonder how far theyll push it before the trends finally turn.
rubbersole
(6,837 posts)Dave Bowman
(2,012 posts)Yeah, it's been a problem for many women since forever. But seriously it's horrible to be treated as second class citizens and it's been going on for way too long.
intheflow
(28,544 posts)and not the earlier passage in Genesis explicitly stating God created men and women, simultaneously, both in Gods image.
This proves to me that men edited the Bible but slipped up from time to time and left in some truth. (Or maybe the nuns were able to sneak it back in. 😉 ) Just like how Mary Magdalene was the first to see Jesus resurrected but the men tried to gaslight her about it and then acted like Jesus appeared to men and men alone.
DFW
(54,739 posts)What with God being an amba and all.....................
getagrip_already
(15,250 posts)People laugh. Saying even scotus won't neuter the constitution.
Only all they need to do is let nullification through as an accepted doctrine; states will then be able to nullify any portion of the constitution they disagree with within their own borders.
It is an until now failed doctrine. But stranger doctrines are finding purchase.
And after all, this scotus is greater than those that have come before.
And the greaat book of Covefe says it is written that all things unrealistic shall become the law of the land. And so it shall be.
Hermit-The-Prog
(33,884 posts)The Subversive Court cares only about enacting its extreme ideology.
malthaussen
(17,280 posts)Except maybe the 2nd Amendment, to appease the gun nuts.
Which to me, incidentally, has always been the decisive refutation of the people who use the Lockean "Appeal to Heaven" argument to support their interpretation of the 2nd Amendment. These people are authoritarian control freaks, if they truly thought a few ARs in the hands of a bunch of Sofa Seals would seriously hinder their wish to establish and hold their Christofascist dream government, they'd oppose the 2nd Amendment with every breath in their bodies. Nazi Germany had some of the strictest gun control regulations on the planet. It seems that their intellectual heirs realize it's not an issue to their power.
-- Mal
Rec
PatrickforB
(14,630 posts)what the Nazis ever did that was illegal.
Seriously.
Here's a link to that in case you didn't catch it: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2024/04/08/maine-lawmaker-nazis-paramilitary-groups/73248828007/
These Republicans are not even pretending any more.
lindysalsagal
(20,933 posts)Last edited Tue Apr 9, 2024, 09:40 PM - Edit history (1)
Repeal women's votes. These bastards believe they're winning.
PatrickforB
(14,630 posts)keithbvadu2
(37,351 posts)Some women would give up the right to vote in order to elect Trump
http://www.latimes.com/nation/politics/trailguide/la-na-trailguide-updates-trump-backers-tweet-repealthe19th-1476299001-htmlstory.html
(about halfway down the page)
Oct. 12, 2016,
Trump backers tweet #repealthe19th after polls show he'd win if only men voted
As polls show that Donald Trump would overwhelmingly win if only men were allowed to vote, the GOP nominee's supporters have spawned a new Twitter hashtag: #repealthe19th.
Thats a reference to the 19th Amendment, which gave women the right to vote.
lindysalsagal
(20,933 posts)Rec
Roy Rolling
(6,961 posts)Arizona wasnt a state in 1864 when they voted on this law. Nor could women even vote against itthey didnt have the right to vote. Perfect model of authoritarian scams.
moniss
(4,274 posts)bringing back "spare the rod, spoil the child".
BaronChocula
(1,701 posts)They'll scrap the entire Constitution. All those "patriotic" Americans we're talking about were never patriotic about America. They were patriotic about white control. As it became obvious that the American consensus was no longer limited to white (straight, Christian) people, they began to attack the American institutions they had championed for so long. If American institutions weren't only for white people then they would do away with them and replace the rules with cheating. Bunch of scumbags.
Bundbuster
(3,354 posts)or Congressmen (and women) - they would all make perfect conscience-free slaveowners in 2024. They all look like carefree plantation owners bidding for slaves in 1850's Savanna or Charleston. Their psyches, policies, and (lack of) values make it an even more perfect fit.
Lovie777
(12,597 posts)TexasDem69
(2,007 posts)Is just going to get rid of the 13th Amendment or any other amendment for that matter. Theres pretty much zero chance that happens in any of our lifetimes.
malaise
(270,014 posts)Very few of us will be here in ten years let alone 20
I know I wont be here for the next solar eclipse.
TexasDem69
(2,007 posts)But theres zero chance the 13th Amendment is eliminated in this century
malaise
(270,014 posts)I didnt say theyd succeed. They are a minority
TexasDem69
(2,007 posts)newdayneeded
(1,971 posts)and a mega majority on the Supreme Court. all they have to do is bring the amendments to the Supreme Court and they can deem them unconditional. You do remember Roe vs wade? One morning the Supreme Court ended it in literally minutes.
Hermit-The-Prog
(33,884 posts)moondust
(20,066 posts)No longer slave owners but the oppressive culture of control freaks remains. If they'll take away Roe, they'll take away the 13th.
keithbvadu2
(37,351 posts)58Sunliner
(4,480 posts)Retrograde
(10,213 posts)because it's the basis for corporate citizenship. As soon as they Rabid Right can figure out how to keep that while getting rid of birthright citizenship the 14th Amendment will be on the chopping block. I can see Alito's convoluted argument that the Reconstruction era amendments should all be thrown out because the states that had left the union didn't get to vote against them.
Hermit-The-Prog
(33,884 posts)The Subversive Court has undermined "equal protection of the laws" (14, Section 1), and participation after rebellion or insurrection (14, Section 3).
IronLionZion
(45,828 posts)and they have wildly diverging answers. Some have said 1776. They're such idiots that they think America has gone downhill ever since independence.
Trump himself has said early 1960s, before LBJ's immigration reforms and the civil rights movement and Medicare. Some idiots choose 1950s. Some say the Reagan years. But they all want to take us backwards to a time when things were great for some but worse for everyone else.
Hiawatha Pete
(1,823 posts)k55f5r
(223 posts)n/t
BigMin28
(1,192 posts)On capturing two thirds of the state legislatures so as to call for a constitutional convention. The republicans are only a few states short of that goal. God only knows what they would do if they succeed in that.
NanaCat
(2,091 posts)But nothing happens without 3/4 of the states ratifying it.
They won't get 37 states on board with it.